Oh well,
there's an approach where one splits users into residential and
business, meaning that residential is only downloading, surfing,
... without need of providing any services back to the 'net. At
least with IPv6 one has to rethink this position as there finally is
end-to-end communication
I will forward your email to the admin them of senderbase.
-Dennis
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Any Senderbase contacts on list? I am having problems getting some questions
answered through normal channels.
thanks,
-Drew
Hello,
I did try to reach someone at SORBS using their contact forms on the
website. Somehow no action was taken and I also didn't get a response. Could
someone from SORBS contact me? I need an issue to be resolved.
With kind regards,
Mark Scholten
SinnerG BV
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:11:13AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
Blocking generic and residential addresses is the single most effective
thing we've ever done to reduce spam.
Really? You mean that if you stopped doing this you'd have trillions,
or quadrillions of spams per day instead now? I'm
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Curtis [mailto:bruce.cur...@ndsu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 5:14 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: I don't need no stinking firewall!
SNIP
IMO you're better off making sure only the services you intend to
provide are listening, and that
Lots of interesting technical information in this thread. Mixed with a
healthy dose of religion/politics :-)
I suspect that most people are going to keep doing what they are doing.
In our environment, at the transport level, we have moved from
stateful towards stateless, as it has proved to be
Folks, you may recall that last June we released a beta version of Netalyzr,
a Java applet you can run by surfing to netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu (or to
netalyzr.com). It measures a bunch of the properties of an end user's
network access, particularly looking for transparent modifications (e.g.,
Is anyone aware of any routing problems with any cable providers yesterday
around 1pm EST? Thanks!
-- Rich
On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:18 AM, Benjamin Billon wrote:
Seems logical, after all.
Considering the (bad) performances of Google search engine in China compared
to Chinese competitors, and considering the fact that wouldn't change a bit
in the future, closing offices wouldn't be a bad thing.
On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
I for one would be really happy to see them follow through with this. I was
very disappointed when they agreed to censor search results, although I can
understand why they did so from a business standpoint... it seemed to go
against the
* Patrick W. Gilmore:
You don't like the law, don't do biz in that country. But blatantly
breaking a law is bad joo-joo.
I think we all consider their approach to copyright law refreshing and
useful, so there are certainly laws worth breaking. 8-)
Rich Casto expunged (richca...@gmail.com):
Is anyone aware of any routing problems with any cable providers yesterday
around 1pm EST? Thanks!
I dare you to be more vague
-Steve
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Steve Meuse sme...@mara.org wrote:
Rich Casto expunged (richca...@gmail.com):
Is anyone aware of any routing problems with any cable providers yesterday
around 1pm EST? Thanks!
I dare you to be more vague
-Steve
Has anyone had any problems this past
Were there any problems on the internet at 1 PM EST yesterday :) But
honestly which provider and in what area?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Steve Meuse sme...@mara.org wrote:
Rich Casto expunged (richca...@gmail.com):
Is anyone aware of any routing problems with any cable providers
2010/1/12 Łukasz Bromirski luk...@bromirski.net:
On 2010-01-12 21:27, Ben Jencks wrote:
This is obviously a rookie question, but I haven't found anything by
searching. I'm looking to set up a small testbed to simulate our
internal network topology, and I want to have a realistic BGP table
On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
I for one would be really happy to see them follow through with
this. I was
very disappointed when they agreed to censor search results,
although I can
understand why they did so
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:07:28 +0100, Martin Hotze said:
... without need of providing any services back to the 'net. At
least with IPv6 one has to rethink this position as there finally is
end-to-end communication
as we finally *return to* end-to-end communication. An important distinction.
We experienced connectivity loss from both our Level 3 and ATT connections
to our telecommuter population who primarily use the following cable
providers: Time-Warner (RoadRunner), Cox, and Comcast. Our ATT circuits go
into NYC and our Level 3 goes into Newark, NJ.
-- Rich
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 17:14, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
I for one would be really happy to see them follow through with this. I was
very disappointed when they agreed to censor search results, although I can
understand why
Jérôme Fleury wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 17:14, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
I for one would be really happy to see them follow through with this. I was
very disappointed when they agreed to censor search results,
You don't like the law, don't do biz in that country. But blatantly breaking
a law is bad joo-joo.
OT.
Please don't say joo-joo every time the TechCrunch folks see that
they get diarrhea
Cheers
Jorge
PS what about all the property and copyright laws being supposedly
broken over there ?
On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
You don't like the law, don't do biz in that country. But blatantly
breaking a law is bad joo-joo.
OT.
Please don't say joo-joo every time the TechCrunch folks see that
they get diarrhea
That is a horrible name for a product. Just
You don't like the law, don't do biz in that country. But blatantly
breaking a law is bad joo-joo.
Is it?
http://images.google.cn/images?hl=zh-CNum=1sa=1q=civil+disobedience
--
TTFN,
patrick
-Original Message-
From: Ken Chase [mailto:m...@sizone.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January
On Jan 12, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:48:31AM -0800, Brian Keefer wrote:
I wouldn't say that necessarily accurate. I could be considered
part of the anti-spam crowd, seeing as that's my line of work.
I think DULs are a really dumb way to block spam.
On January 12, 2010 at 23:03 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu (valdis.kletni...@vt.edu)
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:50:37 PST, Bill Stewart said:
A password recovery method I've found very frustrating is to use the
serial number or similar value that's on a label on the bottom of the
That would be excellent for both the administrator, and anyone walking
down the row with a wand in their pocket.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
On January 12, 2010 at 23:03 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
(valdis.kletni...@vt.edu) wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:55:00 EST, Matt Simmons said:
That would be excellent for both the administrator, and anyone walking
down the row with a wand in their pocket.
Barry's right, for at least some scenarios. If I have an unauthorized somebody
walking down the row with a wand in their pocket,
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simmons [mailto:standalone.sysad...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:55 AM
To: Barry Shein
Cc: nanog@nanog.org; Bill Stewart
Subject: Re: Default Passwords for World Wide Packets/Lightning Edge
Equipment
That would be excellent for both
Barry's right, for at least some scenarios. If I have an unauthorized somebody
walking down the row with a wand in their pocket, the fact they have a wand in
their pocket is the least of my problems.
Encrypt the data?
There seem to be a lot of misconceptions about RFID tags. I'm hardly
an expert but I do know this much:
RFID tags are generic, you don't put data into them unique to your
application.
All they are is a range of long serial numbers guaranteed to be
globally unique, like ethernet macs more or
RFID tags are generic, you don't put data into them unique to your
application.
Field programmable RFID-like tags do exist. They aren't common, but
they're out there.
On 13.01.2010 06:24, Ken Chase wrote:
I must say I'll have to take a step back from my previous position/postings
having read this article.
I just can't figure out their /ANGLE/. :)/cynic
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html
Well played, google?
/kc
From
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Barry Shein wrote:
The big advantage of RFIDs is that you don't need line of sight access
like you do with bar codes, they use RF, radio frequency.
Which is also a big disadvantage in a datacenter. Ever tried to use a
radio in one?
The RF noise generated by digital
On 2010-01-13, at 11:31, Anthony Uk wrote:
The ability to automatically discern users' political positions from their
inbox is not one that any email provider reasonably needs.
It's arguably something that gmail users consent to when they give Google
rights to index and process their mail,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:51:41PM -0500, George Imburgia wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Barry Shein wrote:
The big advantage of RFIDs is that you don't need line of sight access
like you do with bar codes, they use RF, radio frequency.
Which is also a big disadvantage in a datacenter. Ever
On Jan 13, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
There seem to be a lot of misconceptions about RFID tags. I'm hardly
an expert but I do know this much:
RFID tags are generic, you don't put data into them unique to your
application.
Part of the original (or at least early) context for
I have something akin to experience in this arena at least as it applies
to the ambient RF environment and the security of the data transferred.
As a matter of fact the two usually go hand in hand. The issue that I
usually see is how to protect your new drivers license / passport / ID
badge (with
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:51 PM, George Imburgia
na...@armorfirewall.comwrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Barry Shein wrote:
The big advantage of RFIDs is that you don't need line of sight access
like you do with bar codes, they use RF, radio frequency.
Which is also a big disadvantage in a
Not if you change the default password like any sane admin does...
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bellovin [mailto:s...@cs.columbia.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:26 AM
To: Barry Shein
Cc: nanog@nanog.org; nonobvi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Default Passwords for World Wide
Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
There seem to be a lot of misconceptions about RFID tags. I'm hardly
an expert but I do know this much:
RFID tags are generic, you don't put data into them unique to your
application.
Not true, the simplest rfid tags
You should most likely read their terms of service and that would
actually answer this instead of guessing. Also, if your reading your
own employee's email, that is most likely perfectly legal.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On 2010-01-13, at 11:31,
On 2010-01-13, at 14:51, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
You should most likely read their terms of service and that would
actually answer this instead of guessing.
I've read the terms of service. I may be interpreting them incorrectly, sure,
but I'm not guessing.
If your comment was not directed at
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:23:59 MST, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) said:
Barry's right, for at least some scenarios. If I have an unauthorized
somebody
walking down the row with a wand in their pocket, the fact they have a wand
in
their pocket is the least of my problems.
Encrypt
On 1/13/2010 7:44 AM, Rich Casto wrote:
Is anyone aware of any routing problems with any cable providers yesterday
around 1pm EST? Thanks!
-- Rich
I experienced significant packet loss and dropped connections (possibly
caused by that) at about that time yesterday. My ISP is Charter Cable.
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:31:44 +0100, Anthony Uk said:
Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the
attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights
activists.
I have orders of magnitude fewer users than gmail does, and often look
at their mailboxes
On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
Not if you change the default password like any sane admin does...
This is from the OP:
I have recently inherited the management of an undocumented network
(failed FTTH provider) which utilizes World Wide Packets' LightningEdge
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 15:12 -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
Lots of gear has a button/jumper/pop_the_CMOS
battery/other_physical_presence_magic to reset things to factory state,
including the default pw. The threat went on to why default passwords are
bad, to passwords on the bottom of the
In a message written on Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 05:31:44PM +0100, Anthony Uk wrote:
I have orders of magnitude fewer users than gmail does, and often look
at their mailboxes (with their consent, of course), but I still couldn't
tell you the political position of any of them (apart from the
From: Graeme Fowler [mailto:gra...@graemef.net]
And somewhere in the dim and distant past (Jan 6th), Nathan announced
that he'd sorted out his original problem and now had the defaults.
What a peculiar bunch we are. And this from the group lauded as
anonymously and peacefully co-existing to
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:49 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: more news from Google
It's not clear to me you have to read any e-mail to figure out that
help_us_free_ti...@gmail.com might be someone who's
Joe Abley wrote:
On 2010-01-13, at 11:31, Anthony Uk wrote:
The ability to automatically discern users' political positions from their
inbox is not one that any email provider reasonably needs.
It's arguably something that gmail users consent to when they give Google
rights to
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:50:03 PST, Nathan Eisenberg said:
I think the impulse to challenge and question assertions probably tends to
be a common personality feature in (good) network admins.
Something to keep in mind is that this list is, by and large, comprised of
people who are paid large sums
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:31:44 +0100, Anthony Uk said:
Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the
attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights
activists.
I have orders of magnitude fewer users than gmail does, and
On Jan 13, 2010, at 5:26 PM, mshel...@cox.net wrote:
From a single detection of one hostile email you can often expand the picture
to many mail recipients. A little open source research identifies the common
community the recipients belong to. It's pretty straight forward.
The magic
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:55:00PM -0500, Matt Simmons wrote:
That would be excellent for both the administrator, and anyone walking
down the row with a wand in their pocket.
So... someone has a list of the barcodes on all my equipment. ONOES!
Without access to the asset database that backs
Tim Durack wrote:
Replace all the routers on the Internet with stateful firewalls. What happens?
the same thing that happened with flow-cached routers, they melt, you go
out of business, the end.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Chase [mailto:m...@sizone.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:24 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: more news from Google
I must say I'll have to take a step back from my previous
position/postings
having read this article.
I just can't figure
On Jan 13, 2010, at 5:26 PM, mshel...@cox.net wrote:
From a single detection of one hostile email you can often expand the
picture to many mail recipients. A little open source research identifies
the common community the recipients belong to. It's pretty straight
forward.
Anyone having issues updating RADB tonight? I am getting 403 message from URL
to web form. No response from two updates I submitted this evening via email. I
noticed a few other URL's are also giving a 403 message.
http://www.radb.net/cgi-bin/radb/irr-web.cgi
http://www.radb.net/faq.html
Looks like someone messed up permissions on the directories and/or files.
Even the images for the buttons don't appear to work..
http://www.radb.net/images/navbar_bottom_off_02.jpg
403 permission denied... Game over. :o
-Joe
-Original Message-
From: courtneysm...@comcast.net
On Jan 10, 2010, at 1:32 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Jan 10, 2010, at 1:22 PM, harbor235 wrote:
Again, a firewall has it's place just like any other device in the
network, defense in depth is a prudent philosophy to reduce the
chances of compromise, it does not eliminate it nor does
On Jan 14, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
I can now place a checkbox in the Is there a firewall? column of the
insert random acronym here audit.
mod_security is your friend.
;
---
Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net
My update completed eventually. Not sure if the delay had any relation to the
URL issues.
Sorry for top post. Haven't figured how to put inline when using my Droid.
Joe Blanchard jbfixu...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like someone messed up permissions on the directories and/or files.
Even
Updates completing is fine for everyone but Level 3. Switched to a new data
center and both they and I
updated our records and Level 3 still hasn't picked up the updates and its been
9 days.
Sigh
- Original Message -
From: Courtney Smith courtneysm...@comcast.net
To:
64 matches
Mail list logo
