Greetings,
Hi, I have just recently returned to the United States from New
Zealand. I have spent a bit of time down their working as a network
designer for ALU and was a member of NZNOG. The infrastructure demands
and designs are completely different here in U.S. I am currently working
Sorry I meant MBI project not BMI.
On 2/8/10 11:31 AM, James Jones wrote:
Greetings,
Hi, I have just recently returned to the United States from New
Zealand. I have spent a bit of time down their working as a network
designer for ALU and was a member of NZNOG. The infrastructure demands
VOIP, huh? Check out:
www.voiceops.org
David
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:39 AM, James Jones ja...@freedomnet.co.nz wrote:
Sorry I meant MBI project not BMI.
On 2/8/10 11:31 AM, James Jones wrote:
Greetings,
Hi, I have just recently returned to the United States from New
Zealand.
Arg! The attachment died the death of 132485 bytes with a limit of
100 KB. Oh well, it could have been the line eater bug in a USENET post.
I posted an HTML version here:
http://wampum.wabanaki.net/vault/2010/02/005491.html
Cutting and Pasting (a high tech skill) yeilds:
Project Title:
Thanks Eric for support this project.
To all of you who want to donate, donations can be sent to directly to AHTIC
account:
*Please find below the AHTIC bank account information so you can proceed
with the money transfer. Please confirm this is the same information you
have since the beginning.
As a matter of form, how might one check out the legitimacy of requests like
this? (No, I don't think this one is fake...)
I got your point Steven. It's an initiative of the AHTIC the Haitian
Association for the ICT development, Reports will be available on the funds
will be used.
http://www.ahtic.ht
http://www.e2tech.ht
Those sites are references of the AHTIC organizations.
Regards
reynold
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010
-original message-
Subject: Re: Adopt‐an‐Haitian‐Internet‐technician‐or‐facility
From: Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu
Date: 08/02/2010 5:47 pm
As a matter of form, how might one check out the legitimacy of requests like
this? (No, I don't think this one is fake...)
As a start, web of
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 12:47 -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
As a matter of form, how might one check out the legitimacy of requests like
this? (No, I don't think this one is fake...)
(it isn't, for the benefit of any casual observers)
Technically, a `Very Good Point`. We'd all like to think
Steve,
Hmm. Are there other requests like this one? I suppose the pilot's
associations may be trying to raise money to fix the secondary
airfields -- a note from a member of Congress who's significant other
has been shuttling a Cessna and stand-alone early relief payloads from
the US VI to
On Feb 8, 2010, at 9:57 AM, a.harrow...@gmail.com wrote:
As a matter of form, how might one check out the legitimacy of requests like
this? (No, I don't think this one is fake...)
As a start, web of trust. This one was introduced to the list by Eric
Brunner-Williams originally, a member
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:04:22 PST, andrew.wallace said:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
associated paper. I plan to review Ciscoâs architecture for lawful
intercept
Gadi Evron has
True. Signed would have been smarter. Better still would be having
someone with more creds doing the initial ask.
Eric
On 2/8/10 1:05 PM, David Conrad wrote:
On Feb 8, 2010, at 9:57 AM, a.harrow...@gmail.com wrote:
As a matter of form, how might one check out the legitimacy of requests like
On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
Err, no. It was introduced by (unsigned) email purporting to come from
Eric. Followed by another (unsigned) message with bank info purporting to
come from Reynold Guerrier. A bit of a difference.
True. Signed would have been
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Steven Bellovin wrote:
As a matter of form, how might one check out the legitimacy of requests
like this? (No, I don't think this one is fake...)
Although folks on the ground are focused on doing good work, this is an
area where the reputation and infrastructure of
CACE Technologies hosts the third annual Wireshark Developer and User
Conference
at Stanford in June and extends an invitation to the NANOG community to
participate in 3 days of knowledge-transfer with the Wireshark Developer
Group, learning about, and helping to direct, product futures for the
On 2/8/2010 12:05 PM, David Conrad wrote:
On Feb 8, 2010, at 9:57 AM, a.harrow...@gmail.com wrote:
As a matter of form, how might one check out the legitimacy of requests
like this? (No, I don't think this one is fake...)
As a start, web of trust. This one was introduced to the list by Eric
Sean Donelan wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Steven Bellovin wrote:
As a matter of form, how might one check out the legitimacy of
requests like this? (No, I don't think this one is fake...)
Although folks on the ground are focused on doing good work, this is an
area where the reputation and
There is the general problem of control, one reason the IRC contacted CORE
was to investigate a .redcross so that they could reduce their loss to
disaster fraud. Of course, we have to wait on ICANN to get a .redcross or
.icrc or ... .ouch into the root so that it becomes more generally useful
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
You apparently fail to understand that making other people's research well
known in the community is an important role. Would we be more secure, or
less secure, if somebody did the research, but then nobody told the owners
of
For want of a better place to ask, I'm wondering if anyone monitoring
this list might know what is up with the registro.nic.ve web site.
The WHOIS at www.nic.ve refers to that site, and it appears to be down
(for me and downforeveryoneorjustme.com too). Doing old fashioned
native WHOIS isn't
I found this:
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=12p=138914
Frank
-Original Message-
From: James Smallacombe [mailto:u...@3.am]
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 6:24 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Western Canada major outage last night?
I rent a server with
It's nice to hear that people are still either using or interested in
software like NorthStar. I think that the consensus so far is proper
support for IPv6. Luckily the code in NorthStar was written with this in
mind so I don't think adding support will be a huge undertaking. I will be
starting
On 02/08/10 17:13, Crist Clark wrote:
For want of a better place to ask, I'm wondering if anyone monitoring
this list might know what is up with the registro.nic.ve web site.
The WHOIS at www.nic.ve refers to that site, and it appears to be down
(for me and downforeveryoneorjustme.com too).
On 9/02/2010, at 2:13 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
For want of a better place to ask, I'm wondering if anyone monitoring
this list might know what is up with the registro.nic.ve web site.
The WHOIS at www.nic.ve refers to that site, and it appears to be down
(for me and downforeveryoneorjustme.com
After releasing the initial version of the the Internet Revealed at RIPE59
in Lisbon last year, we received some valuable feedback from the wider IXP
community. We took this feedback to the producers of the film and now have a
slightly edited version 2.0 of the film.
26 matches
Mail list logo
