Am 25.04.2010 um 03:29 schrieb Mark Smith:
If obscurity is such an effective measure why are zebras also able to
run fast and kick hard?
Because the stripes hide them from the flies, not the lions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra#cite_note-5
--
Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de Fon +49
Anyone experiencing connectivity problems to South African networks at this
moment? A fellow colleague informed SEACOM cable which is serving east
Africa seems to be down.
Let me know if you have more information on this subject.
Mehmet
On 25/04/2010 13:46, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Anyone experiencing connectivity problems to South African networks at this
moment? A fellow colleague informed SEACOM cable which is serving east
Africa seems to be down.
Let me know if you have more information on this subject.
The problem may be
On 25.04.2010 14:46 Mehmet Akcin wrote
Anyone experiencing connectivity problems to South African networks at this
moment? A fellow colleague informed SEACOM cable which is serving east
Africa seems to be down.
Let me know if you have more information on this subject.
gone?
On Apr 24, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Kevin Buhr wrote:
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu writes:
Ours are currently intentionally configured to not issue queries over IPv6,
because at one time, there were *so many* sites that listed unreachable
quad-A
NS records. Our DNS guy is more than willing to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 03:01, Mark Smith wrote:
I'm a typical, fairly near future residential customer. I have a NAS
that I have movies stored on. My ISP delegates an IPv6 prefix to me with
a preferred lifetime of 60 minutes, and a valid lifetime of 90
On 4/25/2010 10:17, Tony Hoyle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 03:01, Mark Smith wrote:
I'm a typical, fairly near future residential customer. I have a NAS
that I have movies stored on. My ISP delegates an IPv6 prefix to me with
a preferred lifetime of
On Apr 25, 2010, at 8:17 AM, Tony Hoyle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 03:01, Mark Smith wrote:
I'm a typical, fairly near future residential customer. I have a NAS
that I have movies stored on. My ISP delegates an IPv6 prefix to me with
a preferred
What ISP would put a 'lifetime' on your ipv6 prefix? That seems insane
to me... they should give you a /48 and be done with it. Even the free
tunnel brokers do that.
But then I never understood dynamic ipv4 either
Dynamic IPv4 isn't too difficult to understand. There are two main
we know the prefix for afnog.org was not being announced for about 16
hours. no post mortem yet.
randy
Its a shame there is not a pair of images on this site - one originated
from a v4 only box, one a v6 only box. The img src= could point to the
I've been working on something in this direction this past week, that is
primarilly for user facing debugging purposes (versus for a content
Cable fault repairs on SMW4 which currently seacom uses to haul
traffic to europe and onto the rest of the world. Below is subject for
email sent by my upstream provider. Latest information is that it will
take about 3 days if the weather remains friendly.
SMW4 Seg4.1(Alexandria towards west)
On Apr 25, 2010, at 9:11 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
What ISP would put a 'lifetime' on your ipv6 prefix? That seems insane
to me... they should give you a /48 and be done with it. Even the free
tunnel brokers do that.
But then I never understood dynamic ipv4 either
Dynamic
- Dynamic addresses is a way to differentiate residential customers
(who pay less) from business customers (who pay more).
Which is both specious and obnoxious.
It is a business choice, which you may or may not agree with.
Given a choice between a provider which does this and one who
On 4/25/2010 15:27, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
- Dynamic addresses is a way to differentiate residential customers
(who pay less) from business customers (who pay more).
Which is both specious and obnoxious.
It is a business choice, which you may or may not agree with.
Given a choice
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:21:16 -0400
Richard Barnes richard.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Moreover, the general point stands that Mark's problem is one of bad
ISP decisions, not anything different between IPv4/RFC1918 and IPv6.
My example, although a bit convoluted to demonstrate a point, is about
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:17:21 +0100
Tony Hoyle t...@hoyle.me.uk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 03:01, Mark Smith wrote:
I'm a typical, fairly near future residential customer. I have a NAS
that I have movies stored on. My ISP delegates an IPv6 prefix to
In message u2j88ac5c711004251021q54694443l687b8f6aa78c4...@mail.gmail.com,
Richard Barnes writes:
Moreover, the general point stands that Mark's problem is one of bad
ISP decisions, not anything different between IPv4/RFC1918 and IPv6.
Actually one needs to deploy a ULA or have PI addresses
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:20:33AM +0930, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:21:16 -0400
Richard Barnes richard.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Moreover, the general point stands that Mark's problem is one of bad
ISP decisions, not anything different between IPv4/RFC1918 and IPv6.
My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 22:06, Larry Sheldon wrote:
The whole idea that DHCP should only be used for (and is absolute proof
of the status of) despised-class customers is just nuts.
I've never seen DHCP used on residential DSL circuits.. it's all PPP (oA
On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:21:16 -0400
Richard Barnes richard.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Moreover, the general point stands that Mark's problem is one of bad
ISP decisions, not anything different between IPv4/RFC1918 and IPv6.
My example,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 23:53, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:17:21 +0100
Tony Hoyle t...@hoyle.me.uk wrote:
On 25/04/2010 03:01, Mark Smith wrote:
I'm a typical, fairly near future residential customer. I have a NAS
that I have movies stored
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/2010 00:32, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I've been using IPv6 for about 18 seconds, and even *I* know the answer to
that one -- the link-local address.
It should respond at ff02::2 as well (at least to a ping, so you can get
the LL address if
On 4/25/2010 18:33, Tony Hoyle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 22:06, Larry Sheldon wrote:
The whole idea that DHCP should only be used for (and is absolute proof
of the status of) despised-class customers is just nuts.
I've never seen DHCP used on
On 4/25/10 4:33 PM, Tony Hoyle wrote:
On 25/04/2010 22:06, Larry Sheldon wrote:
The whole idea that DHCP should only be used for (and is absolute proof
of the status of) despised-class customers is just nuts.
I've never seen DHCP used on residential DSL circuits.. it's all PPP (oA
On 04/25/10 16:42, Owen DeLong wrote:
That's what Link Local is for.
fe80::EUI-64%interface
For example, if the CPE is connected to the customer's network on eth0
and the CPE mac address is 00:45:4b:b9:02:be, you could go to:
http://[fe80::0245:4bff:feb9:02be]%eth0
... and regardless
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
On 04/25/10 16:42, Owen DeLong wrote:
That's what Link Local is for.
fe80::EUI-64%interface
For example, if the CPE is connected to the customer's network on eth0
and the CPE mac address is 00:45:4b:b9:02:be, you could go to:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:32:30 +1000
Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:20:33AM +0930, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:21:16 -0400
Richard Barnes richard.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Moreover, the general point stands that Mark's problem is one of
On 04/25/10 19:37, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
... and regardless of the specific method, the vendors already document
the procedure for connecting to the web interface for IPv4, there is no
reason to believe that they could not or would not do the same
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:31:51 +0930
Mark Smith na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:32:30 +1000
Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:20:33AM +0930, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:21:16 -0400
Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 4/25/10 4:33 PM, Tony Hoyle wrote:
On 25/04/2010 22:06, Larry Sheldon wrote:
The whole idea that DHCP should only be used for (and is absolute proof
of the status of) despised-class customers is just nuts.
I've never seen DHCP used on residential DSL circuits.. it's
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Does anyone actually believe that the above is user-friendly and will
work in real life? Using link-local for this kind of end-user
administration of their equipment is doomed to fail. There needs to be a
procedure for devices which are going to get DHCP-PD from the
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Jack Bates wrote:
Last 3 cheap routers. BIG STICKER: INSTALL SOFTWARE BEFORE YOU PLUG THIS
ROUTER IN! I doubt many users even use the old goto http://192.168.1.1/;
anymore. That being said, there are private addressing schemes in IPv6 as
well. No reason one could be bound
On 4/25/10 9:23 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 4/25/10 4:33 PM, Tony Hoyle wrote:
On 25/04/2010 22:06, Larry Sheldon wrote:
The whole idea that DHCP should only be used for (and is absolute proof
of the status of) despised-class customers is just nuts.
I've never seen DHCP
On 4/25/2010 5:11 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 4/25/10 4:33 PM, Tony Hoyle wrote:
On 25/04/2010 22:06, Larry Sheldon wrote:
The whole idea that DHCP should only be used for (and is absolute proof
of the status of) despised-class customers is just nuts.
I've never seen DHCP
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:42:31 -0700
Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Apr 25, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:21:16 -0400
Richard Barnes richard.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Moreover, the general point stands that Mark's problem is one of bad
ISP
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Roy wrote:
My old company does it this way. Made life very easy. Most consumer grade
routers come set for DHCP out of the box so it is plug and play.
Yes, running IPoETHoATMoDSL is really nice if you own the dslam yourself,
then it's only a media converter. It's also
37 matches
Mail list logo
