Re: ipv6 bogon / martian filter - simple

2010-06-15 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2010-06-15 01:37, Brandon Applegate wrote: I mean really simple. Like 2000::/3. If it's not in there it's bogon, yes ? At the current time and hopefully for the next 20 years at least yes ;) What I'm really asking, is for folks thoughts on using this - is it too restrictive ? You

Re: ipv6 bogon / martian filter - simple

2010-06-15 Thread Vesna Manojlovic
Hi Brandon, On 6/15/10 9:02 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote: RPSL See RFC2622/2650 there are various tools that can provide you with filters based on that data. Please also tell your customers/peers/transits to use it, many already do and it is the proper way to do filtering on your network. ...

Re: Monitoring Tool

2010-06-15 Thread Thorsten Dahm
Jens Link wrote: Thorsten Dahm t.d...@resolution.de writes: The usual suspects in the open source world would be nagios, cacti, mrtg, netflow, ... There is no tool called netflow. ;-) of course, the German guy has to complain again. :-) cheers, Thorsten

Re: Monitoring Tool

2010-06-15 Thread Joshua William Klubi
Who is the German guy On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Thorsten Dahm t.d...@resolution.de wrote: Jens Link wrote: Thorsten Dahm t.d...@resolution.de writes: The usual suspects in the open source world would be nagios, cacti, mrtg, netflow, ... There is no tool called netflow. ;-)

RE: ipv6 bogon / martian filter - simple

2010-06-15 Thread George, Wes E IV [NTK]
This would be another alternative: http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html Slightly more than 1 line, but the loose case would nuke a few more things than just filtering on 2000::/3 without requiring frequent updates. The strict case requires keeping after it for updates, and you'd

networking podcasts

2010-06-15 Thread Oliver Gorwits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Like probably many others on this list I have my couple of hours commute each day, and tend to fill it with reading, or listening to podcasts. I've found the new PacketPushers podcast to be off to a pretty good start (MPLS, DDoS, Trill,

RE: networking podcasts

2010-06-15 Thread Stefan Fouant
For you Juniper and Arbor wonks out there, you can find some decent podcasts on iTunes... I can't remember the name of the Juniper Podcast but you should be able to find it on iTunes without much effort... I believe the Arbor one is called Security to the Core. Stefan Fouant -Original

Re: networking podcasts

2010-06-15 Thread Andy Davidson
On 15 Jun 2010, at 14:37, Stefan Fouant wrote: For you Juniper and Arbor wonks out there, you can find some decent podcasts on iTunes... I can't remember the name of the Juniper Podcast but you should be able to find it on iTunes without much effort... I believe the Arbor one is called

Re: Live streaming from NANOG49

2010-06-15 Thread T.J. Kniveton
I'm using a 24 iMac in full screen so the resolution is pretty decent. But I hadn't thought about the side benefit of watching what people are doing on their laptops, good entertainment value I suppose. TJ On 6/14/2010 4:34 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:43 AM, T.J.

RE: networking podcasts

2010-06-15 Thread Stefan Fouant
-Original Message- From: Andy Davidson [mailto:a...@nosignal.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:38 AM To: nanog list Subject: Re: networking podcasts There are quite a few Juniper ones[0], though they take the format of a tutorial rather than a discursive/magazine format though,

2010.06.15 NANOG49 day 1 notes, part 1

2010-06-15 Thread Matthew Petach
*heh* OK, watching the web logs this morning while taking notes, I saw a bunch of people trying to grab day 2 already. ^_^; So, given there seems to be some demand, I'm posting the first half of today's notes at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2010.06.15-NANOG49-day2-part1.txt Don't forget to

RE: TWTC

2010-06-15 Thread Mike Walter
Are you asking about TW Telecom or Time Warner Cable? We have clients in CA with TW Telecom with no issues at this time. Mike Walter Sr. Network Engineer 3z.net a PCD Company -Original Message- From: Bill Blackford [mailto:bblackf...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:19 PM To:

2010.06.15 NANOG49 day 2 part 2 notes

2010-06-15 Thread Matthew Petach
Notes from the second half of today (post-lunchtime) are now posted at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2010.06.15-NANOG49-day2-part2.txt Many thanks to those who have been mailing back to correct my errors. I try to catch most of them, but at this speed, some still creep in--though I'm still

Re: BGP Multihoming Partial vs. Full Routes

2010-06-15 Thread Anton Kapela
On Jun 14, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Fred Baker wrote: upstream, full routes are generally not as useful as one might expect. You're at least as well off with default routes for your upstreams plus what we call Optimized Edge Routing, which allows you to identify (dynamically, for each

Re: BGP Multihoming Partial vs. Full Routes

2010-06-15 Thread Jared Mauch
Most providers will give you just their on net prefixes. This is useful if multihomed but you do not really need full tables. Then you can default or similar for the rest of the net. Jared Mauch On Jun 14, 2010, at 11:30 AM, James Smallacombe u...@3.am wrote: I know this topic must have