-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
I'm searching an fundamental book about how to (inter)connect two
networks. It should be about how to connect your business network in a
secure and reliable way to the internet. The book should contain some
theoretical basics and common
Matthias Flittner matthias.flitt...@de-cix.net writes:
Hi Folks,
I'm searching an fundamental book about how to (inter)connect two
networks. It should be about how to connect your business network in a
secure and reliable way to the internet. The book should contain some
theoretical basics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Jens,
thanks for your fast answer.
The Illustrated Network: How TCP/IP Works in a Modern Network
(ISBN-13: 978-0123745415) should cover this topic.
Yes this book covers a lot but I need one which should help me to build
an secure transfer point
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:21:54 +0200, Matthias Flittner said:
I'm searching an fundamental book about how to (inter)connect two
networks. It should be about how to connect your business network in a
secure and reliable way to the internet. The book should contain some
theoretical basics and
On Jun 15, 2010, at 9:27 AM, T.J. Kniveton wrote:
I'm using a 24 iMac in full screen so the resolution is pretty decent. But I
hadn't thought about the side benefit of watching what people are doing on
their laptops, good entertainment value I suppose.
Glad it looks decent for folks out
Hello,
Anyone know of a good tool for sanitizing PCAP files? I would like to
keep as much of the payload as possible but remove src and dst ip
information.
FLAIM: flaim.ncsa.illinois.edu
On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Bein, Matthew wrote:
Hello,
Anyone know of a good tool for sanitizing PCAP files? I would like to
keep as much of the payload as possible but remove src and dst ip
information.
Mike Collins
mcoll...@aleae.com
Does anyone have the video bits from the Haitian panel? I'd like to
run it within our loop at the ICANN meeting next week in Brussels.
Tia!
Eric
Alas, another great NANOG has come to an end;
it went by so quickly this time.
Notes from today, including the inimitable duo of
Todd Underwood and Odd Tunderwood, are now up
at
http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2010.06.16-NANOG49-day3.txt
As always, I'm sure I got a bunch of things wrong,
A while back I remember reading a comment here that WiMax is not a
future proof technology and that several manufacturers have dropped it
or something to that effect. I think it was in the starting a WiMax ISP
thread. This has stuck in my head, and I was curious if there was any
truth to this.
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:35:16 -0700
From: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
WiMax sounds promising, but I certainly don't hear a lot about it
other
than Sprint/Clear. Is it just that everyone that's doing wireless is
sticking with relatively inexpensive 802.11 a/b/g/n products, or is
The future of WiMAX seems a lot less promising now that FD-LTE is the
clear winner for wide-scale mobile deployment, and TD-LTE, 802.11n and
proprietary technologies will compete for non-paired spectrum and/or
niche markets.
But one can build a network with WiMAX and make money out of it;
global
We are having a strange routing issue. If anybody from Shaw cable
could contact me offlist I'd be very thankfull.
Dude,
LTE and WiMax a more siblings, than distinct rivalries. The technologies will
grow together over time, versus, one taking the ascendancy, and the other,
descent. WiMAX is here today, and long term evolution, well, let's see how the
futures play out.
~Jay Murphy
IP Network Specialist
NM
Log sanitation is a whole lot easier than packets. AFAIK, santizing
pcaps is an intractable problem because of various kinds of encodings
that exist within packets.
Examples:
- FTP IPv4 addresses are comma separated
- DNS does label encoding of domain names (especially with pointers)
- Forwarded
they've already claimed they'll probably switch to LTE. They said it
was just a software change to do that. Of course the standard for
actually placing a phone call on it (LTE) has yet to finalized.
On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Gregory Hicks wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:35:16 -0700
From:
OK, this sounds Really Wacky (or, Really Hacky if you're into puns) but there's
a reason for it, I swear...
Will typical OSS UNIX kernels (Linux, BSD, MacOS X, etc) reply to a crafted ARP
request that, instead of having FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF as its destination MAC
address, is instead sent to the
Bein, Matthew wrote:
Hello,
Anyone know of a good tool for sanitizing PCAP files? I would like to
keep as much of the payload as possible but remove src and dst ip
information.
Would address anonymization work? Instead of removing src/dst ip, you
can zero them.
I've used CoralReef
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Chris Woodfield rek...@semihuman.com wrote:
OK, this sounds Really Wacky (or, Really Hacky if you're into puns) but
there's a reason for it, I swear...
Will typical OSS UNIX kernels (Linux, BSD, MacOS X, etc) reply to a crafted
ARP request that, instead of
I just took a closer look at something odd I'd noticed several days ago.
One of our DNS servers was sending crazy amounts of ARP requests for IPs
in the /24 its main IP is in. What I've found is we're getting hit with
DNS requests that look like they're from typical internet traffic for
On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 48AM, Bein, Matthew wrote:
Hello,
Anyone know of a good tool for sanitizing PCAP files? I would like to
keep as much of the payload as possible but remove src and dst ip
information.
What's your threat model? In general, proper anonymization of packet
TCPReplay may be helpful to you.
http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/
==
Travis
www.theipsguy.com
==
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Bein, Matthew mb...@iso-ne.com wrote:
Hello,
Anyone know of a good tool for sanitizing PCAP files? I would like to
keep
In message pine.lnx.4.61.1006162044210.5...@soloth.lewis.org, Jon Lewis write
s:
I just took a closer look at something odd I'd noticed several days ago.
One of our DNS servers was sending crazy amounts of ARP requests for IPs
in the /24 its main IP is in. What I've found is we're getting
Dear Chris,
OK, this sounds Really Wacky (or, Really Hacky if you're into puns) but there's
a reason for it, I swear...
Will typical OSS UNIX kernels (Linux, BSD, MacOS X, etc) reply to a crafted ARP
request that, instead of having FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF as its destination MAC
address, is
We've been seeing the same thing since 2010-06-10:
22:13:19.687981 IP 72.236.167.197.41789 72.236.167.138.domain: 38783+ A?
jkl.cnr.cn. (28)
22:13:19.773076 IP 72.236.167.124.33327 72.236.167.138.domain: 38783+ A?
i10.aliimg.com. (32)
22:13:19.855750 IP 72.236.167.169.33381
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Mark Andrews wrote:
Why was this traffic hitting your DNS server in the first place? It should
have been rejected by the ingress filters preventing spoofing of the local
network.
When I ran a smaller simpler network, I did have input filters on our
transit providers
In message pine.lnx.4.61.1006162237180.5...@soloth.lewis.org, Jon Lewis write
s:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Mark Andrews wrote:
Why was this traffic hitting your DNS server in the first place? It should
have been rejected by the ingress filters preventing spoofing of the local
network.
On 6/16/2010 7:43 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Mark Andrews wrote:
Why was this traffic hitting your DNS server in the first place? It
should
have been rejected by the ingress filters preventing spoofing of the
local
network.
When I ran a smaller simpler network, I did have
RFC 2827 anyone?
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Roy r.engehau...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/16/2010 7:43 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Mark Andrews wrote:
Why was this traffic hitting your DNS server in the first place? It
should
have been rejected by the ingress filters
29 matches
Mail list logo
