-Original Message-
From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetos...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:39 PM
To: Lee Howard
Cc: Todd Underwood; Christopher Morrow; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Todd Underwood was a little late
Registered but unrouted would include space that
P.S. At this point, the IPv6 transition has failed, unlike the Y2K
transition, and
some level of crisis is unavoidable. In desperate times, people take desparate
measures, and adopting IP address ranges that are not used by others in
your locality seems a reasonable thing to do when economic
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote:
P.S. At this point, the IPv6 transition has failed, unlike the Y2K
transition, and
For certain values of fail. The odds of a dual-stack transition as
initially
envisioned by the IETF are vanishingly small, but IPv6 will be a
P.S. At this point, the IPv6 transition has failed, unlike the Y2K
transition, and
For certain values of fail. The odds of a dual-stack transition as
initially
envisioned by the IETF are vanishingly small, but IPv6 will be a significant
part of the coping strategies once RIRs allocate
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Michael Dillon
wavetos...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't think we'll have (nor would we have in 2005 even) gotten an
ipv7/8/9/10 up and spec'd/coded/wrung-out before ~2 yrs from now
either. So, given the cards we have, ipv6 isn't all bad.
On this we agree.
Hi,
I am wondering what tools you consider most valuable when designing
big network from scratch or
perform a migration? For example I would like to know is there a tool
that will perform basic sanity checks
like network equipment without redundant link or without link at all...
I know that the
You can take a look at netdude:
http://netdude.sourceforge.net/
-Original Message-
From: Bein, Matthew [mailto:mb...@iso-ne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:59 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: PCAP Sanitization Tool
Hello,
Anyone know of a good tool for sanitizing PCAP files? I
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Pavel Skovajsa
pavel.skova...@gmail.com wrote:
To emphasise more this subject, the technical support HP Procurve is
providing (for free) is more consumer level and in my opinion is one of the
key differentiators from teams like Cisco TAC. Here is a short laundry
Pavel Dimow paveldi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I am wondering what tools you consider most valuable when designing big
network from scratch or perform a migration?
White board and a digital camera to document the drawings. Pen and paper
are also a very important tool.
For example I would
--- li...@quux.de wrote:
From: Jens Link li...@quux.de
I am wondering what tools you consider most valuable when designing big
network from scratch or perform a migration?
-
Experience. If possible, find someone with it. Or, start reading 24x7
And how do you feel when client tell you that you don't have a
connection from SW-476 to SW-145?
Well you see, there are plenty of boxes out there (couple hundreds)
you don't expect that everything must be perfect right? Anyhow I was
very tired that day
The point is, I am not looking for a
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another UDP
based service)[1].
I see that ARIN are listing on https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html
the smallest allocations from each prefix.
On Jun 21, 2010, at 23:34, William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another UDP
based service)[1].
I see that ARIN are listing on
Paul,
My biggest tool is a couple extra sets of eyes. A fresh look from the
outside by someone else is going to be the biggest help. Pen and Paper
(or Visio w/ Icons
http://packetlife.net/media/library/33/Cisco_Marketing_Icons.zip)
I personally like using network simulators to try out
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:42 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 23:34, William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another
UDP based service)[1].
I
On 2010-06-21, at 17:42, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Are there (a significant number of) providers that will filter a /24
announcement from an ARIN prefix not in the list of prefixes where they
allocate /24 blocks.
Not in my experience, but I don't know how useful that is to know because I
ATT announces ours. It just took a little bit of prodding to get the sales
people to ask the appropriate technical people.
We have a very old ARIN-allocated /24 but we have only one upstream, so we have
no AS number of our own.
On Jun 21, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 21,
On Jun 21, 2010, at 23:55, Joe Abley wrote:
Everyone: Thanks for the replies regarding the /24 announcement from a /20
allocated block. Yes, obviously the /20 announcement will handle the traffic,
too. I'm a regular reader on NANOG and consistently impressed by the
expertise on display and
From: Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:55:40 -0400
I'm interested in the idea of anycasting one of the pool.ntp.org
herd-members. Every time I've suggested such a thing I've been told
(paraphrasing) that a good (server, client) NTP session exhibits
reasonable RTT
sigh... where was this useful data 10 years ago!
http://www.fcc.gov/worldtravel/
--bill
Hi all,
I've got a local v4 peer (ie. an ISP whom I lease fibre from to feed my
clients, they peer with me directly, and we're about to provide mutual
transit for one another).
They (hereinafter 'client') have recently received a /22 from ARIN. The
client's immediate need is to re-assign a /23
Thinking that they will have to go back to ARIN for additional space
relatively quickly without intervention, can anyone provide links to
docs that will help prevent future renumbering or decent management? I
know that I can collapse a lot of their current waste, and I know
where
I can
There was a lightning talk on Netdot at Nanog 48 I'd take a look at the
presentation and the the website. It's quite useful from the documentation and
discovery standpoint
After the initial whit board I generally sit down and document what we're going
to build then we build a transition plan
On 06/21/2010 08:46 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
There was a lightning talk on Netdot at Nanog 48 I'd take a look at the
presentation and the the website. It's quite useful from the documentation
and discovery standpoint
meh, it was nanog 49, and the link is:
Are you considering doing SNTP or regular NTP?
If regular NTP... I once read some excellent advice on AnyCast:
It often doesn't make sense to go through the extra complexity in deploying a
service with AnyCast addressing if it doesn't justify the benefit.
In this sense, I really don't
25 matches
Mail list logo
