On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Ken Chase k...@sizone.org wrote:
So i guess im new at internets as my colleagues told me because I havent gone
around to 30-40 systems I control (minus customer self-managed gear) and
installed a restrictive robots.txt everywhere to make the web less useful to
I *am* curious--what makes it any worse for a search engine like Google
to fetch the file than any other random user on the Internet
Possibly because that other user is who the customer pays have their
content delivered to?
Bruce Williams
Possibly because that other user is who the customer pays have their content
delivered to?
Customers don't want to deliver their content to search engines? That seems
silly.
http://www.last.fm/robots.txt (Note the final 3 disallow lines...)
Customers don't want to deliver their content to search engines? That seems
silly.
Got me there! :-)
Bruce Williams
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
From: Pascal Gloor pascal.gl...@spale.com
Date: 8 September 2010 11:25:18 GMT+01:00
To: swi...@swinog.ch swi...@swinog.ch
Subject: [swinog] IP address are now personal data
Dear community,
something important for us happened today that may have some impact
This is something that has been expected out of the EU as it relates to PII for
a few years now.
- jared
On Sep 8, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Thomas Mangin wrote:
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
From: Pascal Gloor pascal.gl...@spale.com
Date: 8 September 2010 11:25:18 GMT+01:00
To:
On 2010-09-08 14:56, Jared Mauch wrote:
This is something that has been expected out of the EU as it relates
to PII for a few years now.
Fortunately Switzerland is NOT part of the European Union, even though
it seems there are a lot of influences and political pulls
Court verdict (german):
On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2010-09-08 14:56, Jared Mauch wrote:
This is something that has been expected out of the EU as it relates
to PII for a few years now.
Fortunately Switzerland is NOT part of the European Union, even though
it seems there are a lot of
*** APOLOGIES IF YOUR RECEIVED MULTIPLE COPIES OF THE CFP ***
COMSNETS 2011
The THIRD International Conference on COMunication Systems and NETworks
January 4-8, 2011, Bangalore, India
http://www.comsnets.org
(In Co-operation with
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:21:31 PDT, Bruce Williams said:
I *am* curious--what makes it any worse for a search engine like Google
to fetch the file than any other random user on the Internet
Possibly because that other user is who the customer pays have their
content delivered to?
Seems to
-Original Message-
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:24:38 +
From: Nathan Eisenberg nat...@atlasnetworks.us
Subject: RE: yahoo crawlers hammering us
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Message-ID:
8c26a4fdae599041a13eb499117d3c28164ac...@ex-mb-
1.corp.atlasnetworks.us
On Sep 8, 2010, at 10:54 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
I would appreciate any feedback folks can give me.
https://files.me.com/roland.dobbins/y4ykq0
https://files.me.com/roland.dobbins/k54qkv
https://files.me.com/roland.dobbins/prguob
https://files.me.com/roland.dobbins/k4zw3x
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0700, Matthew Petach said:
I *am* curious--what makes it any worse for a search engine like Google
to fetch the file than any other random user on the Internet? In either
case,
the machine doing the fetch isn't going to rate-limit the fetch, so
you're
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Ken Chase k...@sizone.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0700, Matthew Petach said:
I *am* curious--what makes it any worse for a search engine like Google
to fetch the file than any other random user on the Internet? In either
case,
the
-Original Message-
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:54:20 -0700
From: Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com
Subject: NOC Automation / Best Practices
To: nanog@nanog.org
NOGGERS,
(...)
The way I see it, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Along
those lines, I'm
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Martin Hotze wrote:
-Original Message-
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:54:20 -0700
From: Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com
Subject: NOC Automation / Best Practices
To: nanog@nanog.org
NOGGERS,
(...)
The way I see it, an ounce of prevention is
We run a *free* WISP and block 25 but I'm not sure why you would want to force
all traffic through it. That's a touchy argument but it would really bother me
as a paying subscriber.
We use customized squid to haproxy (custom) to route traffic. Our main business
is ddos protection and we use
For either A, B or C you won't get my business, let alone a combination of
all 3.
*wah!* There is too much FORCE here. :-)
Agreed. Just provide tubes and shut down infected customers until they clean
up. Keep it simple. For content delivery, there are several non-evil ways of
doing
Owen DeLong o...@delong.com writes:
I know people at large ISPs with actual data. Port 25 blocking is
quite effective.
Does the data show that blocking was effective, as in the host
didn't detect the block and proceed around it, or, merely that lots
of hosts try the direct approach first?
On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Martin Hotze wrote:
-Original Message-
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:54:20 -0700
From: Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com
Subject: NOC Automation / Best Practices
To: nanog@nanog.org
NOGGERS,
(...)
The way I see it, an ounce of prevention is
--- m.ho...@hotze.com wrote:
From: Martin Hotze m.ho...@hotze.com
I have a private website; I don't want the site to be listed or content found
via a search engine. I want to be able to give the URL out to friends etc. but
I don't want all of the world hotlink or whatever[...]
Someone from Speakeasy please contact me off-list. This is for business
T-1 service.
I've been seeing major packet loss on one of your peering nodes for a
week now and am experiencing degraded service due to this.
Support has been unable to resolve and has been unresponsive for the
past 24
On 9/8/2010 7:18 PM, Paul Norton wrote:
Someone from Speakeasy please contact me off-list. This is for
business T-1 service.
I've been seeing major packet loss on one of your peering nodes for a
week now and am experiencing degraded service due to this.
Support has been unable to resolve
Anyone notice any issues with Cogent?
Internet Health Report showing some high latency to Verizon and a couple of
other carriers.
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/film-industry-hires-cyber-hitmen-to-take-down-internet-pirates-20100907-14ypv.html
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/film-industry-hires-cyber-hitmen-to-take-down-internet-pirates-20100907-14ypv.htmlHas
anyone dealt with this in the
If that's the india story .. seems to be a press release fed by the
vendor - which from their website also offers medical transcription
and SEO
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Brandon Galbraith
brandon.galbra...@gmail.com wrote:
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/film-industry-hires-cyber-hitmen-to-take-down-internet-pirates-20100907-14ypv.html
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/film-industry-hires-cyber-hitmen-to-take-down-internet-pirates-20100907-14ypv.htmlHas
I look forward to receiving those attacks.
Jeff
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com wrote:
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/film-industry-hires-cyber-hitmen-to-take-down-internet-pirates-20100907-14ypv.html
28 matches
Mail list logo
