Re: HE - anyone run into power issues with HE Colo Services?

2010-09-12 Thread Mike Leber
On 9/12/10 9:04 AM, todd glassey wrote: Has anyone run into issues with HE's power and the limitations therein? For instance they seem to want to sell a second rack of space to get any reasonable amount of power into their enclosures. Perhaps that was several years ago when we didn't offer cus

Re: HE - anyone run into power issues with HE Colo Services?

2010-09-12 Thread Jeffrey Lyon
Todd, You're not supposed to build out N+1 with HE's co-lo specials. They offer the cabinet with a limited amount of power to prevent full utilization of the unlimited bandwidth that comes with the bundle. I'm sure they'll sell you space with whatever power and bandwidth you require, but not at th

RE: ISP port blocking practice

2010-09-12 Thread Brian Johnson
>-Original Message- >From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com] >Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 1:10 PM >To: John Levine >Cc: nanog@nanog.org >Subject: Re: ISP port blocking practice > > > >Sent from my iPad COOL! > >On Sep 3, 2010, at 10:10 PM, John Levine wrote: > >>> Really? So, si

Re: Transporting QinQ across a Layer 2 link locked at 1518 octets AND across a Layer 3 link

2010-09-12 Thread Francois Menard
Oops two typos - sunday evening casualties. On 2010-09-12, at 10:06 PM, Francois Menard wrote: > Folks, > > Question #1: > > Is it possible for me to put an MPLS router on both ends of a circuit leased > from a transport service provider which does not support QinQ (i.e. packets > of 1526 byt

Transporting QinQ across a Layer 2 link locked at 1518 octets AND across a Layer 3 link

2010-09-12 Thread Francois Menard
Folks, Question #1: Is it possible for me to put an MPLS router on both ends of a circuit leased from a transport service provider which does not support QinQ (i.e. packets of 1526 bytes), and which requires us to tag traffic onto a well specified set of VLANs (i.e. if we want two VLANs, the s

Re: List of Teredo servers and teredo relays

2010-09-12 Thread khatfield
2350 is about an accurate date considering how quickly migration is happening in most places :) -Original Message- From: Nathan Eisenberg Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:54:49 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: List of Teredo servers and teredo relays > While I would agree in principle, in prac

RE: List of Teredo servers and teredo relays

2010-09-12 Thread Nathan Eisenberg
> While I would agree in principle, in practice we have little control > over what customers use. You won't have a good time at Disneyland if you ride Space Mountain in the unsupported configuration of 'not belted in'. An ISP has no control over what I set my MTU to, and they won't support me i

UK key roll-over - may need to flush name server caches

2010-09-12 Thread Sean Donelan
If you are experiencing DNSSEC lookup validation failures for domains under the .UK TLD, you may (engineering-speak for almost definitely) need to flush your name server caches. http://www.nominet.org.uk/registrars/systems/serviceannouncements/ DNSSEC validation issue Due to a failure of a

Re: List of Teredo servers and teredo relays

2010-09-12 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010, Leen Besselink wrote: On 09/12/2010 08:42 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote: On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Jared Mauch wrote: I would be careful actually using teredo, as some of them (eg: Microsoft) have swaths of native IPv6 networks that are unreachable. While I would agree in princ

HE - anyone run into power issues with HE Colo Services?

2010-09-12 Thread todd glassey
Has anyone run into issues with HE's power and the limitations therein? For instance they seem to want to sell a second rack of space to get any reasonable amount of power into their enclosures. The basic 40U Rack only comes with a single source of power which is limited to 15A meaning it is reall

Re: List of Teredo servers and teredo relays

2010-09-12 Thread Leen Besselink
On 09/12/2010 08:42 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote: > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Jared Mauch wrote: > >> I would be careful actually using teredo, as some of them (eg: >> Microsoft) have swaths of native IPv6 networks that are unreachable. > > While I would agree in principle, in practice we have little cont