Michael Sokolov wrote:
Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
There really isn't a lot of choice, 2 providers, and some minor choice
in how much speed you want to pay for with each one.
Does that mean no CLECs like Covad or DSL.net who colocate in the ATT
CO, rent unbundled dry copper pairs
Jack Bates wrote:
And yet, I'm pretty sure there are providers that have different pipes
for business than they do for consumer, and probably riding some of
the same physical medium. This creates saturated and unsaturated
pipes, which is just as bad or worse than using QOS. The reason I'm
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
You might look at http://fasterdata.es.net. A lot of it is aimed at very
large volume data transfers, but quite a bit is relevant to all TCP
issues.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:34:55 + nanog-requ...@nanog.org fuream loqour :
From: Abel Alejandro aalejan...@worldnetpr.com
Subject: Troubleshooting TCP performance tutorial
This past week I have been trying to find the root cause of tcp
performance problems of a few clients that are using a third
Hello all,
My team is working on technical and technological specifications of a
document for the deployment of Internet service on public frequencies in
rural areas. We welcome your thoughts on the topic in terms of previous
experiences and, well sure, you recommendation in terms of equipment.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net
To: Chris Boyd cb...@gizmopartners.com
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,
On one hand, we all recognize oversubscription as an issue.
Eric,
Thanks for your reply. We're located in Haiti (Caribbean), we use basically
the same template than rural S. America and Africa. I'm waiting for you.
Regards,
Georges-Keny PAUL
2010/9/18 Eric Brunner-Williams brun...@nic-naa.net
Georges-Keny,
Well, I wrote a WiMAX based BTOP application
On one hand, we all recognize oversubscription as an issue.
The high-level of oversub isn't the issue, it's part of the business model.
Of course the high level of oversub is an issue, because service
providers are not willing to commit to providing some particular
level of service. The
Of course the high level of oversub is an issue
We'll disagree then. Oversub makes access affordable.
..with the scary boogeyman of evil illegal P2P filesharing
That just tips the money in the wrong direction. And it's a real threat
(amongst others)...not just that deadly clown
Check out the openbts and tier wireless projects.
Georges-Keny PAUL paulgk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
My team is working on technical and technological specifications of a
document for the deployment of Internet service on public frequencies in
rural areas. We welcome your thoughts on the
Abel Alejandro wrote:
Greetings,
This past week I have been trying to find the root cause of tcp
performance problems of a few clients that are using a third party metro
Ethernet for transport. RFC2544 tests (Layer 2) and iperf using UDP give
good symmetric performance almost 100% the speed of
I 'bookmarked' these folks:
http://www.plus.net/?home=hometop
on June 18, 2008 because they were one of the few who openly admitted to using
DPI to enforce QOS.
Two + years later, they're still around and apparently successful.
Just glancing through the site, I could no longer find any mention
12 matches
Mail list logo
