Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Leo Woltz
We are looking for some MPLS connectivity between Equinix Ashburn and Equinix San Jose who would the group recommend?

Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Steven Fischer
as much contempt as I have at times for Verizon, they've not been a bad carrier with respect to reliability. Our MPLS cloud has been pretty stable On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Leo Woltz leo.wo...@gmail.com wrote: We are looking for some MPLS connectivity between Equinix Ashburn and

Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Leo Woltz leo.wo...@gmail.com wrote: We are looking for some MPLS connectivity between Equinix Ashburn  and Equinix San Jose  who would the group recommend? why not just buy a wave on someone's dwdm system? (why mpls, I suppose, for what sounds like a ptp

RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Brandon Kim
Hi Leo: Just trying to understand the lingo. What do you mean by buying a wave on someone's dwdm system? And what is dwdm? Thanks for the heads up! Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 10:24:16 -0400 Subject: Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity From: morrowc.li...@gmail.com To: leo.wo...@gmail.com CC:

Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Brandon Kim brandon@brandontek.com wrote: Hi Leo: since you are addressing my comment, probably you meant 'chris' there... Just trying to understand the lingo. What do you mean by buying a wave on someone's dwdm system? And what is dwdm? 'wave' -

Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Jared Mauch
I assume you mean some l2 circuit. That is something we can do here at ntt. www.us.ntt.net should get you to the right place. Jared Mauch On Oct 9, 2010, at 4:22 AM, Leo Woltz leo.wo...@gmail.com wrote: We are looking for some MPLS connectivity between Equinix Ashburn and Equinix San Jose

RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Brandon Kim
My apologies! I was still finishing up my morning coffee so it hasn't kicked in yet. Thank you for the explanation however! =) Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:12:16 -0400 Subject: Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity From: morrowc.li...@gmail.com To: brandon@brandontek.com CC:

Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Richard A Steenbegen
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:24:16AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: why not just buy a wave on someone's dwdm system? (why mpls, I suppose, for what sounds like a ptp application) The native wavelength for most longhaul DWDM systems is 10G, and not everybody needs to buy bandwidth in 10Gbps

Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft

2010-10-09 Thread Sven Olaf Kamphuis
no, not the email address is the key, rather a unique string issued by the receiver to each potentuial sender. the email address does not stop spam originating from lets say, hacked windows boxes. -- Greetings, Sven Olaf Kamphuis, CB3ROB Ltd. Co. KG

RE: Mobile Operator Connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Ryan Finnesey
I have been working on a similar project and I am finding it very hard to get the mobile operators to understand why we want as little latency as possible and they are not very open to people peering with their wireless backbone. I hope this will change with more and more eyeballs going wireless.

RE: Mobile Operator Connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Ryan Finnesey
What is the IPX service? -Original Message- From: Jared Geiger [mailto:ja...@compuwizz.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:58 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Mobile Operator Connectivity I would suggest getting on the GRX network. As an enterprise you should be able to get IPX

RE: Mobile Operator Connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Ryan Finnesey
I think the service Equinix hosts is for data roaming -Original Message- From: Leo Woltz [mailto:leo.wo...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:16 PM To: Jared Geiger Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Mobile Operator Connectivity Hi Jared Is this different then the service at

RE: Mobile Operator Connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Ryan Finnesey
From the research I have been doing the only mobile operator I have found open to peering is Vodafone I hope this is helpful. -Original Message- From: Cameron Byrne [mailto:cb.li...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 2:33 PM To: Jared Geiger Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re:

RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Ryan Finnesey
We have been looking into Sprint but one issue we are running into is lack of IPv6 support. So we are looking into Level3 and Global. I think Equinix may also have its own connectivity they can sell you. -Original Message- From: Leo Woltz [mailto:leo.wo...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday,

Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft

2010-10-09 Thread Joe Greco
no, not the email address is the key, rather a unique string issued by the receiver to each potentuial sender. In the system I describe, the email address *is* a unique string issued by the receiver to each potent[u]ial sender. This has the charming property of working very well with the

Routeviews

2010-10-09 Thread Mehmet Akcin
hello, anyone from university of oregon or routeviews project ( routeviews.org ) here ? please contact me off-list please. thanks mehmet

Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote: We have been looking into Sprint but one issue we are running into is lack of IPv6 support. So we are looking into Level3 and Global. I think Equinix may also have its own connectivity they can sell you. Um, if you order an MPLS connection between

Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity

2010-10-09 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote: We have been looking into Sprint but one issue we are running into is lack of IPv6 support.  So we are looking into Level3 and Global.  I think Equinix may also have its own