Has anyone else seen this, starting about midnight EDT last Friday night /
Saturday morning? I advertise a few [more specific] routes to Level3
tagged with 65000:0 for TE. This is something that's worked for years.
Either some of Level3's peers have become customers, or there's something
If anyone from TWTelecom is here, it's probably time to swap out that NPE300
for something with more than 256MB RAM. It's running out of RAM and
resetting all the BGP sessions before they finish getting full routes.
And they have CDP turned on for you?
Guess what happens when you run a 7206VXR (NPE300) as a route server with
3 full feeds? It took me a minute to figure out why my routes that
TWTelecom isn't supposed to see were showing up on
route-server.twtelecom.net, but were seemingly randomly alternating
between Network not in table and
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Heath Jones wrote:
If anyone from TWTelecom is here, it's probably time to swap out that NPE300
for something with more than 256MB RAM. It's running out of RAM and
resetting all the BGP sessions before they finish getting full routes.
And they have CDP turned on for you?
While jumping on the wagon of poking at a particular 175.x.x.x address, I
noticed something in my trace:
10 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms att-level3-30G.washingtondc.level3.net
[4.68.62.30]
1173 ms72 ms73 ms cr2.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.84.82]
1274 ms74 ms75 ms
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Sunday/RAS_traceroute_N45.pdf
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Deepak Jain dee...@ai.net wrote:
While jumping on the wagon of poking at a particular 175.x.x.x address, I
noticed something in my trace:
10 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Sunday/RAS_traceroute_N45.pdf
I'd have thought I didn't need to provide credentials in NANOG, but
apparently one stays quiet too long and you're a noob.
First, to those who have given me basic mpls, traceroute and ip primers
by off list
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 02:48:00PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Sunday/RAS_traceroute_N45.pdf
I'd have thought I didn't need to provide credentials in NANOG, but
apparently one stays quiet too long and you're a noob.
First, to those who
Cameron Byrne allegedly wrote on 10/10/2010 15:38 EDT:
LTE provides some latency benefits on the wireless interface, but the
actual packet core architecture is very similar to GSM / UMTS.
and it's going to be a long time before Local Breakout gets noticeably
deployed.
9 matches
Mail list logo