Apparently I have replied to someone who has been banned from NANOG
unknowingly. My humble apologies to all, this person has been killfiled.
Andrew
He should have been better known for his work. The intertubes will miss you
Sent via mobile.
On Oct 15, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Rodney Joffe rjo...@centergate.com wrote:
On October 16th, we lost a real friend and hero. Sigh
I bet it was terribly hard for Vint to write that. Was really nice to read
though, and to know that he had a good enough friend to express his deep sorrow
so publicly.
While we are on the subject of the godfathers of the Internet, when is a
documentary coming out that tells the story? There
All of the DPRK elite use satellite connections which terminate in Iran. Wonder
if they'll be pissed off when their search for imperialist America is blocked
and they can't seem to figure out tor?
Sent from a mobile phone with a small keyboard, please excuse my mistakes.
On Oct 10, 2010, at
Hello any weekend workers :)
We are looking at urgently deploying an outsourced DNS provider for a
critical domain which is currently unavailable but are having some
difficulty. I've tried contacting UltraDNS who only allow customers from US
/ Canada to sign up (we are in Malta) and their Sales
Thanks everyone for the fast and offline responses! Black Lotus contacted me
directly (almost instantly) and helped me set up an account straight away so
I will give them a try.
On 16 October 2010 12:03, Ken Gilmour ken.gilm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello any weekend workers :)
We are looking at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
isoc has made some movies trying to explain to normal humans what the
fate of internet access might become.
http://www.isoc.org/tools/blogs/scenarios/
imiho, message quality varies. but in general i like what they are
trying to do.
randy
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:31:22 +0100
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
Drafts are drafts, and nothing more, aren't they?
On 10/15/2010 10:51 PM, Rodney Joffe wrote:
On October 16th, we lost a real friend and hero. Sigh
http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2468.html
Quite a few of us felt compelled to remark on his life and effect on us.
They've been nicely collected at postel.org:
Since we are on the topic of IPv6. I'd like to know if anyone has
books/articles they recommend on fully
understanding IPv6 adoption in the work place. I will need to contact ARIN
shortly to request a v6 block.
I'm assuming I would be asking for a /64 being an ISP. But I'd like to read up
as
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 01:43 -0700, Ali S wrote:
He should have been better known for his work. The intertubes will miss you
One day I hope he'll be featured in school history lessons.
An amazing legacy - something approaching 1/3rd of the planet's
population uses it every time they use the
On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Brandon Kim wrote:
Since we are on the topic of IPv6. I'd like to know if anyone has
books/articles they recommend on fully
understanding IPv6 adoption in the work place. I will need to contact ARIN
shortly to request a v6 block.
I'm assuming I would be
Joel's widget number 2
On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:36, Brandon Kim brandon@brandontek.com wrote:
Since we are on the topic of IPv6. I'd like to know if anyone has
books/articles they recommend on fully
understanding IPv6 adoption in the work place. I will need to contact ARIN
shortly to
I'm not sure about a documentary, but a group of us are working on identifying
all the different independent archives that have records from the early years
with the idea of creating a Smithsonian/national archive collection at some
point. We'll probably issue an rfc early next year.
On
On Oct 16, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Then move on to the Internet which as with most things is where the most
cuurent if not helpful information resides.
Eric Vyncke's IPv6 security book is definitely worthwhile, as well, in
combination with Schudel Smith's infrastructure
Thanks everyone who responded. This list is such a valuable wealth of
information.
Apparently I was wrong about the /64 as that should be /32 so thanks for that
correction
Thanks again especially on a Saturday weekend!
From: rdobb...@arbor.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 16 Oct
I wanted to thank everyone for their helpful on-list and off-list reply's.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Byrne [mailto:cb.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:44 AM
To: Ryan Finnesey
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: T-Mobile USA - Peering Policy
On
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:40:41 +1030
From: Mark Smith na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:31:22 +0100
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
Drafts are drafts, and
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:40:41 +1030
From: Mark Smith na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:31:22 +0100
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:26:54 -0700
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:40:41 +1030
From: Mark Smith
na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:31:22 +0100
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
You give a /64 to the end users (home/soho), and /48 to multi homed
organization (or bigger orgs that use more than one network internally) and get
a /32 if you are an ISP.
See also the discussion about what to use in p2p links.
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Kim
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Mark Smith
na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:52:31 -0400
Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:40:41 +1030
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
Drafts are drafts, and nothing more, aren't they?
must be some blowhard i have plonked
Drafts are drafts. Even most RFCs are RFCs and nothing more. Only a
handful have ever been designated as Standards. I hope this
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:56:28 +0100
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
Drafts are drafts, and nothing more, aren't they?
must be some blowhard i have plonked
Drafts are drafts. Even most RFCs are RFCs and nothing
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:24:41 +1030
From: Mark Smith na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:26:54 -0700
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:40:41 +1030
From: Mark Smith
Hi Kevin,
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:13:22 -0700
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:24:41 +1030
From: Mark Smith
na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:26:54 -0700
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Date:
I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data
network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
any issues with this?
On Saturday night, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com postulated:
I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
any issues with this?
It's truly unsigned?
(15 bit)
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
On Saturday night, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com postulated:
I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
any issues with this?
It's truly unsigned?
(15 bit)
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA,
16 bit integers. Ok, a lame joke.
22694.NET and 58A6.NET are available. What are you trying to name?
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
16 bit integers. Ok, a lame joke.
22694.NET and 58A6.NET are available. What are you trying to name?
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Day Domes daydo...@gmail.com
32 matches
Mail list logo
