Factoid: we outnumber the pigs by 1000 to 1. Even if only 1% of us
were
to go out and shoot a pig, we would still outnumber them 10 to 1! We
*CAN* win -- wake up, people!
Dude.
As someone who was personally connected to this
(http://www.komonews.com/news/local/78088192.html), and this,
how do i find archives of this list from the '90s and early '00s?
randy
Randy Bush wrote:
how do i find archives of this list from the '90s and early '00s?
randy
Partial list here:
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/historical.html
On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Original Message -
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@creative.net.au
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010, Ken Chase wrote:
And if they come and ask the same but without a court order is a bit
trickier and more confusing, and this list is a good place to
I withhold comment... discuss amongst yourselves.
Best,
Gadi.
Original Message
Subject:[funsec] And Google becomes a DNS..
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:34:50 +0200
From: Imri Goldberg lorgan...@gmail.com
To: funsec fun...@linuxbox.org
Found on reddit:
On 12/5/10 5:50 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
I withhold comment... discuss amongst yourselves.
Found on reddit:
http:/
Not sure why the URL didn't go through...
http://i.imgur.com/Q5SVu.png
Enjoy.
Gadi.
Nathan Eisenberg nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
As someone who was personally connected to this (http://www.komonews.com/ne=
ws/local/78088192.html), and this, http://www.komonews.com/news/local/68320=
537.html I feel pretty justified in telling you to keep this 'shoot a pig' =
crap off the
On 12/5/2010 11:32 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Pretty much, I no longer care what you wrote. Go away. Seriously. Just
GO AWAY. Alt.politics is -- thataway.
*plonk*
--
Die gedanken sind frei.
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:53:22 GMT, Michael Sokolov said:
Factoid: we outnumber the pigs by 1000 to 1. Even if only 1% of us were
to go out and shoot a pig, we would still outnumber them 10 to 1! We
*CAN* win -- wake up, people!
Yes, but shooting down an RFC1925-compliant porker may require
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 19:52, Ben Jencks b...@bjencks.net wrote:
DHCPv6-PD (prefix delegation) with the relay installing static routes
is probably the most straightforward way.
Apparently that has it's own problems right now actually:
In article
xs4all.aanlktin5aoqklbixfn9elnpodlbcdxn1e0ati7wbu...@mail.gmail.com you write:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 19:52, Ben Jencks b...@bjencks.net wrote:
DHCPv6-PD (prefix delegation) with the relay installing static routes
is probably the most straightforward way.
Apparently that has it's
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
of running RIPng. The thought of letting Belkin routers (if you can call
them that) into the routing table scares me no end.
I think that indeed looks scary. I wouldn't be too concerned about the
Belkin routers.
How many SP
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Sergey Voropaev
serge.devo...@gmail.com wrote:
Does any one know the NMS (network management software) which can do the
fallowing:
1. Monitor on Cisco Routers/Switches interface utilization every 5-10
seconds and send e-mail alarm when utilization low or high
On 06/12/2010, at 6:54 AM, Bill Fehring wrote:
Apparently that has it's own problems right now actually:
http://blog.ioshints.info/2010/10/dhcpv6-relaying-another-trouble-spot.html
In our deployment mode, the CEs are running PPP sessions to the
BRAS, so they know when it reboots and can
I've been pondering IPv6 setups, and I don't understand how IPv6 rDNS
is supposed to work. It's clear enough how you look up any particular
address, but it's not at all clear to me what you put into an rDNS
zone and how you put it there.
In IPv4 land, it is standard to assign matching forward
On Dec 4, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
- Ratio needs to be dropped from all peering policies. It made sense
back when the traffic was two people e-mailing each other. It was
a measure of equal value. However
In article
xs4all.aanlktikm-=0xt8kjv0_0gbc7fzxofobn+fh8oil6v...@mail.gmail.com you write:
If there is an inexpensive CPE with an implementation of DHCPv6 PD
that works without issues,
I would love to hear about who makes it, and what the device is...
AVM Fritzbox 7270/7340/7390
Draytek Vigor
Hi John,
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I've been pondering IPv6 setups, and I don't understand how IPv6 rDNS
is supposed to work. It's clear enough how you look up any particular
address, but it's not at all clear to me what you put into an rDNS
zone and
On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:32 PM, James Hess wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
of running RIPng. The thought of letting Belkin routers (if you can call
them that) into the routing table scares me no end.
I think that indeed looks scary. I wouldn't be
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Nick Hilliard wrote:
least once a second. Perhaps you are thinking about the rate counters that
are often _configured_ to use the last 30 seconds of data to compute the
average but also update much more
On Dec 5, 2010, at 2:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
I've been pondering IPv6 setups, and I don't understand how IPv6 rDNS
is supposed to work. It's clear enough how you look up any particular
address, but it's not at all clear to me what you put into an rDNS
zone and how you put it there.
On 06/12/2010, at 8:25 AM, Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin wrote:
Hi John,
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I've been pondering IPv6 setups, and I don't understand how IPv6 rDNS
is supposed to work. It's clear enough how you look up any particular
address,
how do i find archives of this list from the '90s and early '00s?
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/historical.html
how did you find that? the link labeled Historical NANOG List Archive
on the page http://nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/ got me to this
month's archive.
randy
Just how much free time do you have? :)
1 minute to google the capacity of a 747-400F.
1 minute to google the dimensions and weight of an lto-4 cartridge.
1 minute to punch the numbers into bc(1).
--lyndon
On 5 dec 2010, at 23:19, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
In article
xs4all.aanlktikm-=0xt8kjv0_0gbc7fzxofobn+fh8oil6v...@mail.gmail.com you
write:
If there is an inexpensive CPE with an implementation of DHCPv6 PD
that works without issues,
I would love to hear about who makes it, and
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 2:57 PM
To: Michael Painter
Cc: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: Re: list archive
how do i find archives of this list from the '90s and early '00s?
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:56:30 +0900
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
how do i find archives of this list from the '90s and early '00s?
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/historical.html
how did you find that? the link labeled Historical NANOG List
Archive on the page
Hi,
Is there any paper/link that discusses the financial repercussions
when an ISP's network goes down because of an attack/outage? What i am
looking at is something that i can explain to a lay person, about why
the networks need to remain secure so that they cant be hacked into,
as once it comes
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/historical.html
how did you find that? the link labeled Historical NANOG List
Archive on the page http://nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/ got
me to this month's archive.
After following the the Historical NANOG List Archive link, there is
a box on
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: John Levine jo...@iecc.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 5 December, 2010 2:54:43 PM
Subject: Re: How do you do rDNS for IPv6 ?
On Dec 5, 2010, at 2:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
When hosts self-configure their low 64
On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Glen Kent wrote:
Any help in this regard would be really appreciated.
This 2009 report (and reports from previous years) may be of interest:
http://www.arbornetworks.com/report
The 2010 report is in process right now, FYI.
Here're some additional presentations
On 12/5/2010 4:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
In IPv4 land, it is standard to assign matching forward and reverse
DNS for every live IP, and a fair number of services treat requests
from hosts without rDNS with added scepticism. For consumer networks,
it's often something like
This one goes back to April 1994:
before then, the opsish list was com-priv
randy
February 2000 weren't the first DDOS attacks, but the attacks on multiple
well-known sites did raise DDOS' visibility.
What progress has been made during the last decade at stopping DDOS
attacks?
SMURF attacks creating a DDOS from directed broadcast replies seems to
have been mostly
34 matches
Mail list logo
