On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Richard Barnes wrote:
Could you elaborate? Which circumstances?
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.
If the broadband service is provided with bridged mode (i.e. If
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:11:46 -0500
From: Christopher cal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Network Naming
To: nanog@nanog.org
Message-ID: 4d3f3c92.9050...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I usually name them after ex-girlfriends
On
World to run out of IP addresses soon, Internet expert says
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/sci/2011-01/26/c_13708282.htm
Vint Cerf, who helped create IPv4 in 1977 and one of the founding fathers
of the Web, told Australia's Sydney Morning Herald that IP addresses will
be used up soon,
Class Action? ;-)
...Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
ske...@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
eintellego -
On 27/01/2011 11:21, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I thought it was an experiment and I thought that 4.3 billion IPv4
addresses would be enough to do an experiment, Cerf was quoted as saying,
adding it is his fault that we were running out of the addresses.
Fortunately, web developers have fixed the
Him, admitting fault, well then, why should we spend money on IPv6, if
it's his fault does that mean he will come to our business to roll out
v6?
Let's get a list together of who he will visit first :)
G
Gary Steers
Sharedband NOC/3rd Line Support
E: gary.ste...@sharedband.com
-Original
At 12:24 27/01/2011 +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/01/2011 11:21, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I thought it was an experiment and I thought that 4.3 billion IPv4
addresses would be enough to do an experiment, Cerf was quoted as saying,
adding it is his fault that we were running out of the
Reading this thread, and building on many comments to a previous one,
I definitely see the need for subnetting a /64 arising sooner than
later.
It might not be perfect, It might be ugly, but it will happen. And, if
you ask me, I would rather subnet a /64 than end up with a ipv6
version of NAT, a
So Do you run a small network? Or are there LOTS of EX-girlfriends?
;)
Scott
On 1/27/11 5:30 AM, Ivan Brunello wrote:
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:11:46 -0500
From: Christopher cal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Network Naming
To: nanog@nanog.org
Message-ID:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
Reading this thread, and building on many comments to a previous one,
I definitely see the need for subnetting a /64 arising sooner than
later.
It might not be perfect, It might be ugly, but it will happen. And, if
you ask me, I would rather
All the leading MSOs are actively working towards IPv6 trials and
deployments, they're just at different stages. Comcast, as we all can see,
is publicly leading, but there are others who are not too far behind.
See U.S. cable companies embrace IPv6
On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:53 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
It's actually pretty well known and it is documented in several places in
plain
sight.
Where?
A search for IPV6_V6ONLY in the FreeBSD Handbook yields nothing. You'd think
the brokenness
On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/01/2011 11:21, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I thought it was an experiment and I thought that 4.3 billion IPv4
addresses would be enough to do an experiment, Cerf was quoted as saying,
adding it is his fault that we were running out of the
I guess I won't need to add routes to my gateway, only subnetting on the
inside will probably do for the time being (a hub/spoke topology,
routing only between directly-connected subnets). And many ISPs allow
you to buy your own CPE.
Using an AirPort Extreme (or other home router with similar
I am definitely *NOT* an advocate of NAT66 nor am I an advocate of further
subneting a /64 into longer prefixes.
Where additional IPv6 prefixes are required a prefix shorter than a /64
should be delegated.
John
=
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
e)
In message c966c429.7fd46%john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com, Brzozowski,
John wri
tes:
In order to deploy /56 to end users would require an IPv6 /24 be dedicated
to 6rd, /48s would require a dedicated IPv6 /16. This assumes an operator
wants/needs to provide IPv6 via 6rd to end users where
I agree with you, but, will it happen? The same fixed boundary
behaviour that makes the /64 so convenient for LAN addressing ends up
making the same /64 very convenient for ISPs as well. They associate
the /64 with the single public IP they issue to customers nowadays.
Again, I would *love* to be
On Jan 27, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
Reading this thread, and building on many comments to a previous one,
I definitely see the need for subnetting a /64 arising sooner than
later.
Why?
It might not be perfect, It
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
In regards to (2), is it even possible to do DHCPv6-PD on with
On 1/27/2011 1:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
By IA_TA support, do you mean the ability for the 7206VXR to act as the DHCPv6
server? If I understand you correctly, I have it working well with DHCPv6
relay.
Yeah, IA_TA is the temporary addresses (compared to prefix delegation).
I haven't tested
V4 30 years ago -- expected consumption: ~60 /8s of 256.
IPv6 today -- expected consumption: Maybe 15 /12s of 4096.
The scales in question are vastly different.
I made no such comparison between the two. The scales are vastly different,
but I think you're still missing my point. 30 years ago, no
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'd like to see IPv4 go away in ~3 years. Any faster would be too traumatic.
I think 6 years is a perfectly reasonable time frame. I think if it takes 11
years
it will be because of significant foot-dragging by some key organizations.
I'm not
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
I agree with you, but, will it happen? The same fixed boundary
behaviour that makes the /64 so convenient for LAN addressing ends up
making the same /64 very convenient for ISPs as well. They associate
the /64 with the single
On 1/27/2011 1:09 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I'm not as sold on RBE in a 7206VXR,
even though I really could use the same Option 82 in the same way as we do
for FTTH.
What was your problem with RBE? I've loved it (except for the 3000
interface configs that take 3-5minutes to write).
Jack
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'd like to see IPv4 go away in ~3 years. Any faster would be too traumatic.
I think 6 years is a perfectly reasonable time frame. I think if it takes 11
years
it will be because of
I'm not missing your point. I'm saying that in IPv6, we've put enough
addresses
in to allow for things nobody has thought of in 30, 60, 90, even 100 years
and
then some.
As Roland said,
Possibly, as long as we don't blow through them via exercises in profligacy
nobody has heretofore thought of,
On 27/01/11 08:17 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
In regards to (2),
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Link then. I've had DSL modem vendors sending me
their IPv6 stuff. It's been horrid.
I don't know what I was thinking last night, but I believe I had SLAAC +
DHCPv6-PD working myself, but wasn't satisfied. =) I'm not comfortable
using SLAAC for WAN addresses in a service provider environment.
I do DHCPv4 relay today. DHCPv6 relay worked perfectly on an PVI, but with
a SVI with
On Jan 27, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'd like to see IPv4 go away in ~3 years. Any faster would be too traumatic.
I think 6 years is a perfectly reasonable time frame. I think
Agreed, the DSL stuff is horrid. When using PPPoE it asks me to enter the
default IPv6 gateway. You got to be kidding me.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:34 AM
To: Dan White
Cc: frnk...@iname.com;
All,
Thanks for the feedback on the topics for the NANOG ISP Security Track BoF
Scheduled on Monday 4:30 - 6 pm in the Grand conference room.
Brief Snapshot of the current agenda:
- RPKI Deployment Overview and Example
- Operation Payback, Anonymous Tool Set Taxonomy
- Briefing on SPAM
I'm a bit torn on this issue. I haven't even heard any other main-stream
sources say anything on this topic. But Incorrect info is bad too.
I hope the viewers who watched this are getting the gist that Something wicked
this way comes. :)
LOL
- Brian J.
-Original Message-
From: Owen
I have been knocking down this Romanian IRC botnet since Thanksgiving
and Dynadot has been dragging their feet. I even called and talked to
someone in tech support, which was an Asian guy with a small grasp of
English but that's another discussion, and still they say they are
investigating it
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Brian Johnson bjohn...@drtel.com wrote:
I'm a bit torn on this issue. I haven't even heard any other main-stream
sources say anything on this topic. But Incorrect info is bad too.
I hope the viewers who watched this are getting the gist that Something
On 1/27/11 7:33 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Link then. I've had DSL modem vendors sending me
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/26/internet-run-ip-addresses-happens-anyones-guess/
It's the end of the web as we know it. We are doomed !!
Glad to know that, since a large percentage of it suxs.
Can we go back to the ftp.funet.fi (still up !! ) and gopher ?
Cheers
Jorge
On 01/27/2011 12:46 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On 1/27/11 7:33 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Link
I really wish people would keep their personal/political bias outside the list
unless it is specific and relevant. What other main-stream news organization
has made any reports on this issue?
To be clear, FOX screwed this up big time, but that doesn't mean we all need to
get out our
--- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
From: Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
---
Ewww, yuck! ...this router utilizes dual active firewalls (SPI and NAT) to
prevent potential attacks from
On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/26/internet-run-ip-addresses-happens-anyones-guess/
It's the end of the web as we know it. We are doomed !!
Glad to know that, since a large percentage of it suxs.
Can we go back to the
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
I really wish people would keep their personal/political bias outside the
list unless it is specific and relevant. What other main-stream news
organization has made any reports on this issue?
As much as I agree with the comments people have
Hi,
I have not seen this in the discussion yet.
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
CPE support does not seem to be very broad yet.
As far as I can see there is almost PPPoE only for IPv6 in Europe.
In Germany cable is a mess by regulation. So no
- Original Message -
From: Brian Johnson bjohn...@drtel.com
I really wish people would keep their personal/political bias outside
the list unless it is specific and relevant. What other main-stream
news organization has made any reports on this issue?
To be clear, FOX screwed this
[ Sorry; forgot to address this to the list, earlier. ]
- Original Message -
From: Brian Johnson bjohn...@drtel.com
I'm a bit torn on this issue. I haven't even heard any other
main-stream sources say anything on this topic. But Incorrect info
is bad too.
I hope the viewers who
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:04:31 PST, Owen DeLong said:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
The ipv6 zealots talking about anything but a /64 for end-site are
talking about a business class service. Even with my static IPs at
home, I have no need for more than a single /64 to be
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Jared Mauch wrote:
The ipv6 zealots talking about anything but a /64 for end-site are
talking about a business class service. Even with my static IPs at
home, I have no need for more than a single /64 to be used in my wildest
dreams. I could live with ~256 ips for the
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Fox didn't screw up, for a change, and Vint's quote appears in many
other news sources. Apparently, I'm the only one on Nanog who knows
about this new thing called The Google. :-)
Fox (in the linked article) didn't quote Vint.
They said useful
here's the original quote (which a friend had pasted to me):
Web developers have tried to compensate for this problem by creating IPv6
-- a system that recognizes six-digit IP addresses rather than four-digit
ones.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, david raistrick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Jay
On 1/27/2011 2:43 PM, david raistrick wrote:
here's the original quote (which a friend had pasted to me):
Web developers have tried to compensate for this problem by creating IPv6 --
a system
that recognizes six-digit IP addresses rather than four-digit ones.
And as replied privately to
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 2:06 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Found: Who is responsible for no more IP addresses
- Original Message -
From: Brian Johnson bjohn...@drtel.com
To be clear, FOX screwed
Let me clarify:
The original question was (so far as I could see): Was Fox making up the
quote where Vint took the blame for IPv4 exhaustion?
The answer, of course, was no, they didn't; lots of people have the quote.
I wasn't speaking to the technical details of the actual piece, which,
George, Wes E [NTK] wrote:
The second one from several months ago is still borked:
IPv4, ... the unique 32-digit number used to identify each computer, website
or internet-connected device. ... The solution to the problem is IPv6, which
uses a 128-digit address. So, first it was 32 digits,
What I don't understand is I can only guess they must have a IT team.
And Maybe even 1 or more people that view this list. Why don't they just
talk to there own staff about the issues? Maybe one of the IT guess saw
the issues talked about the articles and contacted the news team about
the bad
- Original Message -
From: John Bashinski jb...@cisco.com
Well, this has generated some interesting messages, and apparently
some people think that the large router vendor in question should
speak for itself.
Yay!
Realities
=
5. Some of the people installing these
On 1/27/11 10:01 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
For god's sake, stay away from the DIR-825(Rev A), which has been
effectively abandoned by DLINK support and has no IPv6 support at all.
pretty sure you can't find those on the shelf...
The current model I bought on a lark for someone for christmas
unlike a simpler device you can actually turn that off.
in fact it has more knobs than you've likely seen in a consumer cpe...
joel
On 1/27/11 10:40 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
From: Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most
On Thu, January 27, 2011 2:31 pm, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On 1/27/11 10:01 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
For god's sake, stay away from the DIR-825(Rev A), which has been
effectively abandoned by DLINK support and has no IPv6 support at all.
pretty sure you can't find those on the shelf...
The current
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:26:58PM -0800, Mark Keymer wrote:
What I don't understand is I can only guess they must have a IT team.
And Maybe even 1 or more people that view this list. Why don't they just
talk to there own staff about the issues? Maybe one of the IT guess saw
the issues talked
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 03:26:58 pm Mark Keymer wrote:
If you work at FOX maybe you should help get the news guys on the right
page. :)
Coming from broadcast engineering prior to my current IT gig, let me tell you
that in most larger broadcast organizations the tech folk are rather
I consider it to be very much part of the general attitude of news
organisations towards the online content. It seems in general that very
little editorial oversight takes place with online content, compared to
what might appear in print. Often seems rather much like the content
comes direct
Several people have suggested I (re)post information about test-ipv6.com
here.
http://test-ipv6.com ..
tests ipv4 and ipv6 by dns name
tests dual stack (will the client break on World IPv6 Day?)
tests ipv6 by IP literal (teredo can pass this)
gives advice to end user about current
So keep in mind I don't have an SP background. I have a client who has this
idea of getting into the SP business and I'm trying to help them realize,
realistically, what kind of undertaking this will be.
For a residential SP, what is a good reference for general guidelines on
sizing. Such
On 1/27/11 10:40 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
From: Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
---
Ewww, yuck! ...this router utilizes dual active firewalls (SPI
Around 2236 UCT, we lost all Internet connectivity with our contacts in
Egypt, and I'm hearing reports of (in declining order of confirmability):
1) Internet connectivity loss on major (broadband) ISPs
2) No SMS
4) Intermittent connectivity with smaller (dialup?) ISPs
5) No mobile service in
As a Clear customer, some things that I would inform you of:
Using RFC1918 in their backbone:
Traceroute from my internal network out:
$ traceroute 8.8.8.8
traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.12.250.49 (10.12.250.49) 1.671 ms 1.467 ms 3.214 ms - my network
2
I have a server with CityNet Host in Cairo. The server and ISP are
completely offline
On 1/27/2011 12:56 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 03:26:58 pm Mark Keymer wrote:
If you work at FOX maybe you should help get the news guys on the right
page. :)
Coming from broadcast engineering prior to my current IT gig, let me tell you
that in most larger broadcast
In message alpine.bsf.2.00.1101271448000.15...@goat.gigo.com, Jason Fesler wr
ites:
Several people have suggested I (re)post information about test-ipv6.com
here.
http://test-ipv6.com ..
tests ipv4 and ipv6 by dns name
tests dual stack (will the client break on World IPv6 Day?)
On 28/01/2011, at 10:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
d.
Please direct any comments, flames, etc directly to me instead of the
list. I've added enough noise already :-)
Note you can have totally broken IPv6 connectivity and still be
fine on World IPv6 day. You just need applications with
Note you can have totally broken IPv6 connectivity and still be
fine on World IPv6 day. You just need applications with good
multi-homing support.
Agreed so far.
No web site can check this for you.
Hmm. What's wrong with asking the browser to try a dual-stack url today,
as a proxy for
Some interesting financial news... Unsure if this is related the outages,
but interesting.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/egypt-market-slumps-as-mideast-turmoil-spreads-2011-01-27
EGYPT: Stock market stumbles amid nationwide
On 1/27/2011 6:25 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Anyone for peering cake?
Yeah, Google, HE, Cogent, Sprint, Qwest, and Level3 all need peering
cakes (as I'm pretty sure there is no participant in that list which is
connected to every other participant in that list). If you could bake
I'd suspect it's got a lot more to do with the open rioting on the
streets, government shooting people, the numbers involved in protests,
what happened in Tunisia next door etc. etc. Loss of Internet
connectivity is relatively minor in comparison.
Any investor with even half a brain is going
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I expect that in ~3 years, we will see dual-stack and /64's handed out in
conjunction with an IPv4 address as common.
The ipv6 zealots talking about anything but a /64 for
On 1/27/2011 7:03 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Security and logical division are a few ideas.
You might not care to do that now... but in 20 years, when you have
10 smart chip / IP-based home automation enabled devices on your
LAN.
My helpdesk decided to counter with We'll run out because of
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:47 PM, Danny O'Brien wrote:
Around 2236 UCT, we lost all Internet connectivity with our contacts in
Egypt, and I'm hearing reports of (in declining order of confirmability):
1) Internet connectivity loss on major (broadband) ISPs
2) No SMS
4) Intermittent
On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:53 22PM, mikea wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:26:58PM -0800, Mark Keymer wrote:
What I don't understand is I can only guess they must have a IT team.
And Maybe even 1 or more people that view this list. Why don't they just
talk to there own staff about the issues?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Marshall Eubanks t...@americafree.tv
wrote:
On twitter (follow the #jan25 and #jan28 hash tags), there are many
reports of loss of internet connectivity in Egypt. Apparently cell phones
and land lines are still
In message alpine.bsf.2.00.1101271623320.15...@goat.gigo.com, Jason Fesler wr
ites:
Note you can have totally broken IPv6 connectivity and still be
fine on World IPv6 day. You just need applications with good
multi-homing support.
Agreed so far.
No web site can check this for you.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:20:54PM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:53 22PM, mikea wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:26:58PM -0800, Mark Keymer wrote:
What I don't understand is I can only guess they must have a IT team.
And Maybe even 1 or more people that view this
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:59:15PM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 6:25 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Anyone for peering cake?
Yeah, Google, HE, Cogent, Sprint, Qwest, and Level3 all need peering
cakes (as I'm pretty sure there is no participant in that list which is
connected
Hi,
Looking at the BGP announcements it seems that the problem started at
around 22:28 UTC.
Most of the Autonomous systems operating in Egypt are currently not
announcing any or at least significantly less prefixes.
The one exception seems to be AS20928 (Noor Data Networks).
For more
On 01/28/2011 12:47 AM, Danny O'Brien wrote:
If anyone can provide more details as to what they're seeing, the extent,
plus times and dates, it would be very useful. In moments like this there
are often many unconfirmed rumors: I'm seeking concrete reliable
confirmation which I can pass onto
Sorry to be Johnny-come-lately to this...
On 1/24/11 6:31 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Right, I've heard the circular dependency arguments. So, are you
suggesting the RPKI isn't going to rely on DNS at all?
correct. it need not.
Maybe I am misunderstand something here... Are
On 1/25/11 7:04 AM, Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Jan 25, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
If the DNS was as unreliable as those words suggested, nobody would use it.
I see evidence of this unreliability every day, so I must respectfully
disagree.
;
The
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
If they're routing a /64 to your gateway, you're all set. If they're not,
then, how are you getting the /64 in the first place?
Bridged ethernet across the broadband provider network to the ISP router.
Each customer gets a single /64 vlan to their
On 1/27/2011 7:51 PM, Osterweil, Eric wrote:
I think the bottom line is that this infrastructure will allow a security
solution to reach deployment_much_ sooner than a green-field design.
Errr, yeah. See IPv6 deployment.
Jack
Why does this stop the whole thing short?
the devil is in the details and the trust. i am desperately open to
other approaches. but work it out at the detailed level, not just a
troll on nanog. i anxiously await your and danny's draft.
randy
On 1/27/2011 7:56 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
If the ISP wont route additional prefixes, then the customer is forced
to do the latter.
If the ISP wont route additional prefixes, they don't support IPv6.
Jack
On 1/27/2011 3:47 PM, Danny O'Brien wrote:
Around 2236 UCT, we lost all Internet connectivity with our contacts in
Egypt, and I'm hearing reports of (in declining order of confirmability):
1) Internet connectivity loss on major (broadband) ISPs
2) No SMS
4) Intermittent connectivity with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Roy r.engehau...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest that you confine your information to the press on what you know
rather than speculation on the cause.
I think the earlier references to the BGPmon blog article is
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Roy r.engehau...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/27/2011 3:47 PM, Danny O'Brien wrote:
Around 2236 UCT, we lost all Internet connectivity with our contacts in
Egypt, and I'm hearing reports of (in declining order of confirmability):
1) Internet connectivity loss on
On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:14 AM, John Curran wrote:
As noted, we're now looking into how to fix the IRR authentication
situation and will report back asap.
Based on the ARIN's IRR authentication thread a couple of weeks ago, there
were suggestions placed into ARIN's ACSP process for changes to
Hi folks,
Can anyone recommend any collo's in both Memphis TN and Louisville, KY?
Preferably in their respective downtown areas?
Thanks mucho,
-graham
I am researching some PCRF solutions for some work I am doing with
non-US operators, and I am looking for features that work well in
pre-paid mobile environments, particularly ones that want to cap or
charge 3G and WiFi at different rates / levels.
Any suggestions or contacts?
--
Also on
I am wrapping my mind around the myriad of RAN solutions out there,
and I would appreciate it if someone had a good overview of the
subject or could direct me to new vendors worth investigating.
So far, I see ones that are designed to (a) increase coverage, (b)
increase capacity, or (c) do some
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Brian Johnson bjohn...@drtel.com wrote:
I really wish people would keep their personal/political bias outside the
list unless it is specific and relevant. What other main-stream news
organization has made any reports on this issue?
To be clear, FOX screwed
On 1/27/2011 6:24 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/01/2011 11:21, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I thought it was an experiment and I thought that 4.3 billion IPv4
addresses would be enough to do an experiment, Cerf was quoted as
saying,
adding it is his fault that we were running out of the addresses.
And to add to this thread, an graph of Egyptian Internet traffic across a
large number of geographically / topologically diverse providers yesterday (Jan
27):
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5291/5395027368_7d97b74c0b_b.jpg
Traffic drops to a handful of megabits following the withdrawal of
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
