Why does it matter what his position is? Sounds like they had a forged LOA
from the customer and that they fixed the issue when they found out about it.
I am not sure you can ask too much more from a network operator, the best
thing we can hope for are companies that will cancel customers
In message AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE763997FE7@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet
.us, John van Oppen jvanop...@spectrumnet.us wrote:
Why does it matter what his position is?
Well, if he was, you know, just the janitor or something, then I think
that we could all safely assume that his opinions
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 01:36:55AM -0400, Atticus wrote:
Maybe, if you didn't act like a flaming douchebag, and were polite to
people, they would be more interested in helping you out.
And were it ten or fifteen years ago, I might agree with you.
But it's not. By now, everyone knows, or darn
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a v6
carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
Marc
On 4/1/2011 5:41 AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a v6
carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
Depending on whether or not the packet
So the hell with his prose: focus on the matter at hand. Let's find out
what happened here and how, who's responsible, and what it'll take to stop
them from doing it again and again.
Well put.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Richweb.com outgoing
Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a
recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross. ;)
Scott
On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I
I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
- Reply message -
From: Scott Morris s...@emanon.com
Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 9:01 am
Subject: v6 Avian Carriers?
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a
recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:30:45 CDT, =?utf-8?B?R1AgV29vZGVu?= said:
wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
RFC1149 says:
Avian carriers can provide high delay, low throughput, and low
altitude service. The connection topology is limited to a single
point-to-point path for
From: Joao C. Mendes Ogawa
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:14 PM
Subject: Fwd: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
FYI
--Jonny Ogawa
- Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
Dang, I was hoping to see an RFC on Bufferbloat in Avian Carriers and
how tail-drop is
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, GP Wooden wrote:
I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
I'm not sure about that, but we know that, if a Sullenberger unit has been
installed, a large aircraft can survive a DoS attack perpetrated by the
avian carrier.
--
Brandon Ross
Please note, I'm not arguing against fixing the problem. I just think we
should show each other some professional respect, and use some manners.
I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for fractional
DHCP where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
155.229.10.20:1024-2047. Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
carrier NAT would have other shares of the same public IP. :)
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for fractional
DHCP where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
155.229.10.20:1024-2047. Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
carrier NAT would have other shares of the same
I'm thinking both TCP and UDP, and for ICMP don't NAT's use the sequence
number field to keep them separate ?
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.orgwrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for
On 1 Apr 2011, at 17:47, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for fractional
DHCP where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
155.229.10.20:1024-2047. Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
carrier NAT would have other shares of
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41 11AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a
v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
I was disappointed in this
Hi
Anyone out there deploying multihost CPE/MS with 16e WiMAX?
Do your CPEs enforce a specific MTU (1400) for upstream traffic?
I would like to hear from anyone (offline) that is dealing with MTU
challenges with mulithost 16e deployments.
Thanks!
Eric Morin
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Steven Bellovin wrote:
I was disappointed in this RFC -- Section 3.1 didn't include the proper
discussion of the difference between African and European avian
carriers, and we know what happens if that question is asked at the
wrong time.
That discussion would be out of
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
I believe that the Sullenberger unit effected the loss of the avian carriers
requiring regeneration and retransmission.
Dave Edelman
On Apr 1, 2011, at 12:19, Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, GP Wooden wrote:
I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
I'm thinking both TCP and UDP, and for ICMP don't NAT's use the sequence
number field to keep them separate ?
SNIP/
In my experience, the Avian Carriers usually eat the NATs.
James R. Cutler
james.cut...@consultant.com
Be careful what you wish for:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-aplusp
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Dorn Hetzel d...@hetzel.org wrote:
I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for fractional
DHCP where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
BGP Update Report
Interval: 24-Mar-11 -to- 31-Mar-11 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS19743 34999 1.7%4999.9 --
2 - AS982926736 1.3% 26.6 -- BSNL-NIB
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 1 21:12:20 2011 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Is there anyone from GVT or Embratel with a clue willing to help me with a
BGP route issue we are seeing?
Thanks
It's also especially sensitive to icing induced packet loss.
Owen
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:30 AM, GP Wooden wrote:
I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
- Reply message -
From: Scott Morris s...@emanon.com
Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 9:01 am
Subject: v6 Avian Carriers?
I thought iced-over fiber was a little bit like muffler-bearings. Great
excuse if they buy it.
Mike
On 4/1/11 6:07 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It's also especially sensitive to icing induced packet loss.
Owen
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:30 AM, GP Wooden wrote:
I wonder on the carrier
On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Brandon Ross wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, GP Wooden wrote:
I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
I'm not sure about that, but we know that, if a Sullenberger unit has been
installed, a large aircraft can survive a DoS attack perpetrated by the
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41 11AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a
v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or
tunneling?
Swallows have MTU issues.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41 11AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So
if a
Which? African or European Swallows?
(Watches Chad fly over the cliff edge) ;-)
Owen
On Apr 1, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Chad Dailey wrote:
Swallows have MTU issues.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
Not true.
The occupants of the aircraft survived. The aircraft did not.
Hm, in my recollection the payload made it to the destination. Perhaps
the route was a bit unexpected though.
--
Brandon Ross AIM:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:49 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Which? African or European Swallows?
(Watches Chad fly over the cliff edge) ;-)
So the RFC needed more text in it's Security Considerations section, too...
Owen
On Apr 1, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Chad Dailey wrote:
wil,
maybe after all this time you got the router, it gained 7lbs of all the
dust in it ?
Op 1-4-2011 3:26, Wil Schultz schreef:
On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:14 PM, Joao C. Mendes Ogawa jonny.og...@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI
--Jonny Ogawa
- Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
From:
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:34:52 -0500
Subject: Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Chad Dailey na...@thedaileyplanet.com
Swallows have MTU issues.
No swallows? Oh, spit.
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 04:18:00 +0200
From: Alexander Maassen outsi...@scarynet.org
Subject: Re: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
wil,
maybe after all this time you got the router, it gained 7lbs of all the
dust in it ?
Consider what happens if the carrier encounters a route
Isn't that what the uvula is for?
Oh... never mind wrong swallow. ;)
On 4/2/11 3:34 AM, Chad Dailey wrote:
Swallows have MTU issues.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41
Random re-encapsulation. Now there's an interesting protocol!
On 4/2/11 3:53 AM, Brandon Ross wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
Not true.
The occupants of the aircraft survived. The aircraft did not.
Hm, in my recollection the payload made it to the
Trying to track down someone at Comcast who maintains DNS. I'm having a number
of Comcast users who are unable to resolve mozilla.org hosts.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647254
Tried using other channels to find contacts but am running dry. Email offline
or comment in that
40 matches
Mail list logo
