Hi,
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16
however.
Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to
iterate through the entire second octet? Thanks!
--
Eugen*
I would look into Asatro, they have a solid product and good support.
If you want a contact person let me know and I will email you directly.
On 4/9/11 11:55 AM, pr...@cnsny.net wrote:
Andrew,
We use and offer Postini - a front end service. Postini is a anti virus and
spam filter, and can
-Original Message-
From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eu...@leitl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:11 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Syngenta space
Hi,
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
which is obviously bogus.
Hi,
I have some doubts about the minimal configuration to handle an SDH 1+1
protected circuit with OSPF on a single Juniper router platform (one
interface as the Working Circuit and another interface as the Protect
Circuit).
Reading the JunOS documentation, for instance the 9.4 JunOS version:
This may be the wrong place to ask but maybe one of you could point me in a
direction.
I'm looking for [ideally] historical market pricing for mpls/ipl between as
many as possible city pairs [with a focus toward Asia] as well as ip maybe 5
year back.
Thanks,
Chris
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Luigi Iannone
lu...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
This is not true. There are several works out there showing that the FIB will
not grow as you are saying.
Having taken some time to discuss this off-list with Luigi. I'd
already read the paper he had in mind,
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all?
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all?
i am particularly impressed by the annexation of some of the rfc1918
space.
randy
On 04/13/2011 09:48 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Randy Bushra...@psg.com wrote:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all?
*checks
Ill throw in 10.0.0.0 /8 for just the lint, but it better be really good
lint
From: Paul Graydon p...@paulgraydon.co.uk
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: 04/13/2011 03:54 PM
Subject:Re: Syngenta space
On 04/13/2011 09:48 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44
On 13 Apr 2011, at 20:44, Randy Bush wrote:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
You can make almost anything fly if you put enough oomph behind it..
--
Leigh
On 04/13/2011 12:44, Randy Bush wrote:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
/me pops open the kevlar umbrella
(thanks for the warning!)
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:44:19 +0900, Randy Bush said:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
Only if they're RFC1925 compliant. :)
pgpNN8r9epD9z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
Bugger. Now I have to renumber out of my 172.16/12 subnets :-(
On 4/13/11 6:11 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16
however.
Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to
iterate
On 4/13/2011 12:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
Well, sometimes they do.
http://wardsci.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_IG0035229
[Flying Pig: Unforgettable Fun with Physics]
--
The person
On Apr 13, 2:44 pm, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
And to think, Google manages to get by with the equivalents of a few /
16 or smaller.
and pigs fly
Well, sometimes they do.
There underlying problem here is flying sheep:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY
Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue.
On 13 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
and pigs fly
Well, sometimes they do.
There underlying problem here is flying sheep:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY
Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue.
Yes that's it. 172/8 is nesting. Perhaps if 172/8
On 4/13/11 4:50 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
On 13 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
and pigs fly
Well, sometimes they do.
There underlying problem here is flying sheep:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY
Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue.
Yes that's it.
Sometimes with alternate propulsion:
http://img24.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc188image=ab44c_incroyable.jpg
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Lynda shr...@deaddrop.org wrote:
On 4/13/2011 12:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8
We have a client that we resent moved to some new address space (We have
had the the space for a couple of years now) However it looks like the
mail server for js.pentagon.mil are droping all packet to them. :(
If anyone had some leads on a way to contact them. Please contact me
off-list.
We did
23 matches
Mail list logo
