> Many years ago I was the MCI side of the Real Broadcast Network. Real
> Networks arranged to broadcast a
> Rolling Stones concert. We had the ability to multicast on the Mbone and
> unicast from Real Networks caches.
> We figured that we'd get a hit rate of 70% multicast (those who wanted to
>> I sent this information to the rwhoisd mailing list originally but I've
>> been informed that the mailing list is mostly dead now.
This is normal.
rwhoisd is very old software that has had no development attention for
many, many years.
Years ago I gave up trying to figure out why it would not
On Sat, 7 May 2011, George Bonser wrote:
Things are about to get very different very quickly. Assuming by full
BGP feed you mean both IPv4 and IPv6, you are soon going to need
something that takes >500,000 routes. There are two reasons for this.
First as the larger blocks of v4 space become un
>
> Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2
> x
> full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local
> network?
>
> I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM
> but I'm guessing things have moved on???
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
On 7 May 2011 at 11:02, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2011, Support wrote:
>
> > Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x
> > full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network?
> >
> > I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Support wrote:
Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x
full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network?
I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM
but I'm guessing things have moved on???
>> 2 x
>> full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local
>> network?
> For new hardware, I would look at the Juniper M or MX series (depending on
> your needs) or, if you are wanting Cisco, the ASR series is what to look for.
> The Juniper routers are going to be less expensi
I do it currently with Cisco 2821 routers with 1 GB of RAM, so it doesn't take
all that much for just the BGP. It all depends on the throughput. I have sites
that have 7200VXR routers with NPE-G2 and 2GB of RAM that handle 2x 1 Gig
feeds, albeit not fully loaded.
For new hardware, I would look
A simple M7i can handle this.
But this will depend on the type of trafic ( pps, filtering or not, ... )
regards,
--
Raphaël Maunier
NEO TELECOMS
CTO / Responsable Ingénierie
AS8218
On May 7, 2011, at 3:49 PM, Support wrote:
> Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take
Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x
full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network?
I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM
but I'm guessing things have moved on???
Thanks,
Chris
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Tom Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:59 -0500, Kornelijus Survila wrote:
>> Snort (http://www.snort.org/) is also a nice IDS. They provide paid
>> and free rules/signatures.
>
> And if you would like 64bit and/or IPv6 support, try Suricata:
>
> http://www.ope
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:59 -0500, Kornelijus Survila wrote:
> Snort (http://www.snort.org/) is also a nice IDS. They provide paid
> and free rules/signatures.
And if you would like 64bit and/or IPv6 support, try Suricata:
http://www.openinfosecfoundation.org/
Tom
I gotta say that those microtik boxed are pretty impressive. I have quite a few
that give me Layer 2 VPN in the lab and they have been faultless so far.
--
Leigh Porter
On 6 May 2011, at 21:46, "Francois Menard" wrote:
>
> How about RouterOS from Mikrotik ?
>
> You cannot beat a $70 RB750
13 matches
Mail list logo
