(that's next winter, right?)
I've just seen a TV ad for Duke Nukem Forever, in a Hulu airing of
The Daily Show.
Cheers,
-- jr 'Finally??' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think
finally after waiting for it 4ever
Joshua
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
(that's next winter, right?)
I've just seen a TV ad for Duke Nukem Forever, in a Hulu airing of
The Daily Show.
Cheers,
-- jr 'Finally??' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth
On 06/12/2011 03:31 PM, Tom Hill wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 14:46 -0400, Deric Kwok wrote:
We will apply ipv6 from ARIN and try to use it in hosting business
1/ Can we use it in our current AS which is using ipv4? If not. Do we
have to apply new AS?
No, you can route IPv6 IPv4 from the
On Jun 14, 2011 10:36 PM, Ryan Finnesey
ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com wrote:
I think this would be helpful.
Agreed. You don't need anybody's permission, kick it off.
The last v6day was an isoc effort, there can be a separate nanog effort or
your own.
Cb
Cheers
Ryan
-Original
Ricky Beam jfb...@gmail.com wrote:
And IPv6 has been designed (poorly, it would now appear) for huge LANs
-- LANs are supposed to be /64, after all.
Ethernet is not designed for huge LANs. If you want that you need
to make significant changes - http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mas90/MOOSE/
Tony.
--
On 06/14/2011 03:25 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I urge everyone in this thread to try a simple experiment. Configure
an IPv6 segment in your lab. Make sure there is no IPv4 on it, not
on the router, and that the IPv4 stack (to the extent possible) is
disabled on the hosts. Now try to use one of
Mine got delivered to my office yesterday! :)
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS
-Original Message-
On 15 jun 2011, at 16:52, Tony Finch wrote:
Ethernet is not designed for huge LANs. If you want that you need
to make significant changes - http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mas90/MOOSE/
Hm:
Our object is to design a communication system which can grow smoothly to
accommodate several buildings full
In a message written on Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:22:12AM -0500, Jima wrote:
Oh, oops; you did touch upon this. You might want to let the people
who've implemented RDNSS in software know that the IETF is working on
it. I'm sure that'll be a relief.
Maybe I'm missing something, but the last
On 15 jun 2011, at 18:39, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but the last update on this was RFC
5006 I think, which is marked as experimental, and I thought the
IETF still had a working group discussing it.
You missed the upgrade to proposed standard:
Hey All,
So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering using
private /30's for new peerings. Are there any horrific consequences to picking
up this practice?
Cheers,
James
On Jun 15, 2011, at 12:47 PM, James Grace wrote:
So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering
using private /30's for new peerings. Are there any horrific consequences to
picking up this practice?
Horrific? How about: Most peers won't bring up a session.
What
On 15/06/2011 17:47, James Grace wrote:
So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering
using private /30's for new peerings. Are there any horrific
consequences to picking up this practice?
yes. it causes nasty problems if you use urpf (as you should), in
particular
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, James Grace ja...@cs.fiu.edu wrote:
Hey All,
So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering
using private /30's for new peerings. Are there any horrific consequences to
picking up this practice?
You can reclaim space by switching
IPv4? IPv6?
are you planning to do NAT or PAT?
Are you using a bogous ASN 64512 through 65534 to be used for private purposes?
/30 - 4 addresses/2 hosts - you can't do a mesh configuration w/ that subnet
mask..
--- On Wed, 6/15/11, James Grace ja...@cs.fiu.edu wrote:
From: James
Ethernet is not designed for huge LANs. If you want that you need
to make significant changes - http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mas90/MOOSE/
Hm:
Our object is to design a communication system which can grow smoothly to
accommodate several buildings full of personal computers and the
i guess you have a lot of ibgp sessions ..:-)
bgp finite state model
http://www.inetdaemon.com/tutorials/internet/ip/routing/bgp/operation/finite_state_model.shtml
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:04:44 +0200, sth...@nethelp.no said:
How big is huge? To some degree it depends on how broadcast chatty
the protocols used are - but there's also the matter of having a
size which makes it possible to troubleshoot. Personally I'd prefer
an upper limit of a few hundred
Could a human being from SORBs please contact me off-list? Your robot isn't
functional, and you are listing one of our ARIN allocations as dynamic, when it
is not.
(Yes, I know that 'no one uses' SORBs. Customers don't care.)
Nathan
On 06/15/2011 11:45 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 15 jun 2011, at 18:39, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but the last update on this was RFC
5006 I think, which is marked as experimental, and I thought the
IETF still had a working group discussing it.
You missed the
EHLO Folks,
Can someone from Eircom please contact me?
--
Landon Stewart lstew...@superb.net
SuperbHosting.Net by Superb Internet Corp.
Toll Free (US/Canada): 888-354-6128 x 4199
Direct: 206-438-5879
Web hosting and more Ahead of the Rest: http://www.superbhosting.net
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:26:19PM +, Nathan Eisenberg said:
Could a human being from SORBs please contact me off-list? Your robot isn't
functional, and you are listing one of our ARIN allocations as dynamic, when it
is not.
(Yes, I know that 'no one uses' SORBs. Customers don't
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
In fact. Although a website of mine worked flawlessly in a dual-stack
but it did NOT in an IPv6-only environment. Unfortunately, the problem
has to be fixed in the DNS provider, which though supporting
records was enough to support IPv6.
Why not run your own
On 6/15/2011 12:14, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
In fact. Although a website of mine worked flawlessly in a dual-stack
but it did NOT in an IPv6-only environment. Unfortunately, the problem
has to be fixed in the DNS provider, which though supporting
records was enough
Seth Mattinen wrote:
listen-on-v6 { any; };
Yeah that's what I did. But I keep reading about how these big name
companies messed it up in some subtle or not so subtle way and I keep
thinking I must have missed something. Because surely those big
companies can't find it that difficult, can
On 6/15/2011 12:32, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
listen-on-v6 { any; };
Yeah that's what I did. But I keep reading about how these big name
companies messed it up in some subtle or not so subtle way and I keep
thinking I must have missed something. Because surely those big
In a message written on Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:32:09PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart
wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
listen-on-v6 { any; };
Yeah that's what I did. But I keep reading about how these big name
companies messed it up in some subtle or not so subtle way and I keep
thinking I must have
Leo Bicknell wrote:
but it all doesn't matter because the network team hadn't actually
made IPv6 work yet as there was no business case.
Ahhh, ok, well at least I know I did it right the first time.
No, I'm not cynical. :)
It probably reflects daily practice for many big organisations,
In message 4df91ab3.6020...@mompl.net, Jeroen van Aart writes:
Leo Bicknell wrote:
but it all doesn't matter because the network team hadn't actually
made IPv6 work yet as there was no business case.
Ahhh, ok, well at least I know I did it right the first time.
No, I'm not cynical. :)
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 08:05:14AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
You tell named to listen on IPv6 (listen-on-v6). It already uses IPv6
to make queries unless you turned it off on the command line with named -4.
To go IPv6 only on a dual stack machine use named -6.
You add records to the
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:52 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Our object is to design a communication system which can grow smoothly to
accommodate several buildings full of personal computers and the facilities
needed for their support.
Ethernet: Distributed Packet Switching for Local
Dear Colleagues,
The Internet Society has announced that it is inviting applications for its
latest Internet Society Fellowships to the IETF, part of its Next Generation
Leaders (NGL) programme (www.InternetSociety.org/Leaders). The Fellowship
programme allows engineers from developing
Hi All,
I guess this is a bit off-topic since this is the North American network
operators group, but I was wondering if anybody had much experience with fiber
infrastructure in the South East Asia area.
For reference, generally the WikiPedia entry on South East Asia describes the
service
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:51:52 EDT, Chris Griffin said:
PrefixesChange ASnum AS Description
19227 115-19342 AS15557 LDCOMNET NEUF CEGETEL (formerly LDCOM
NETWORKS)
Somehow, I get the feeling that a network engineer at AS15557 is about to have
a very bad
Singapore, with a fallback / DR location in say Hong Kong.
[Or vice versa depending on what parts of south east asia you want ..
for india, singapore would be your best bet]
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Michael DeMan na...@deman.com wrote:
For reference, generally the WikiPedia entry on
35 matches
Mail list logo
