I've worked with Colo Solutions twice in the past, very pleased.
"Knuckles" has to be one of the nicest NOC engineers that I've run across,
hopefully he hasn't found any greener grass.
As to the facility, top-notch power and environment protection, but they were a
little bit soft on their 48VD
Cogent and Google have had several issues over the past month. I have
opened 3 tickets up with Cogent over inability to reach Google (web,apps,
dns,etc). Each time they have been known issues by the time I called.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson
Aol & Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Thanks Tom, I will you keep in you mind if/when Melbourne gets into the
picture. Right now it's Orlando proper.
-graham
On 8/21/11 1:34 PM, "TR Shaw" wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Graham Wooden wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Our next POP deployment is going to be in Orlando (mainly s
> John Curran appears to be completely open to constructive suggestions
very well phrased
unfortunately it is a long way to results, with very high variance
randy
Jimmy,
On Aug 21, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> The system is this way BY DESIGN, and any other method would concentrate
> power
> which would be detrimental to the internet and counter to its
> open/consensus driven nature.
See recent discussions in RIPEland regarding BGPSEC+RPKI reg
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Ken Chase wrote:
That said, what is the de jure responce when a prefix is hijacked? Does
anyone have a 'best practices' guide? I am sure some of the most effective
vs legal practices are not in fact concomittant.
It doesn't hurt to complain/announce about it here and vario
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 05:26:46PM +, Nathan Eisenberg said:
>John Curran appears to be completely open to constructive suggestions, so
if you have real and substantive input, why not contribute your intellect to
the problem and talk to him? Every organization has things they could be
On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Graham Wooden wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Our next POP deployment is going to be in Orlando (mainly supporting that
> CLEC client that I mentioned earlier last week).
>
> Can any one share their "good/bad/ugly" experiences with "Colo Solutions"
> there? We had a brief c
Hi there,
Our next POP deployment is going to be in Orlando (mainly supporting that
CLEC client that I mentioned earlier last week).
Can any one share their "good/bad/ugly" experiences with "Colo Solutions"
there? We had a brief conf call with their sales engineer but looking for
real-world expe
> On Aug 20, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
>> I completely agree... the real issue here is the system is flawed and
>> RIPE/ARIN/APNIC etc have zero actual authority over actual routing. Yet
>> another reason they aren't worth the money we flush down the toilet for them
>> to do abs
> RIPE/ARIN/APNIC etc have zero actual authority over actual routing.
That is not a flaw in the system, it is a fundamental precept of it. Their
function (In Curran's words: "as the community has defined it") is as a
registry of allocation data, not as some kind of authoritative regional route
On Aug 20, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
> I completely agree... the real issue here is the system is flawed and
> RIPE/ARIN/APNIC etc have zero actual authority over actual routing. Yet
> another reason they aren't worth the money we flush down the toilet for them
> to do absolut
And it's over as of tomorrow night.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/BUSINESS/08/20/verizon.strike/
Scott.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> As of midnight, 45,000 IBEW and CWA members are striking Verizon, as their
> contract has expired.
>
>
> http://www.reuters.com/artic
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Erik Bais wrote:
> Convenient as it may be to use a LIR and their historic provided prefixes,
> have you thought about starting with a clean slate ?
It's probably better for the network community if he _doesn't_ let an apparently
known hijack to continue; maybe
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Denis Spirin wrote:
> Where do you see the permission of Internap to transit our AS31733?
>
> aut-num: AS31733
> as-name: LINKTEL-AS
> descr: Link Telecom PJSC
> org: ORG-LTP1-RIPE
> import: from AS8342 accept ANY
> im
What I understand is that he is clamming that the registration of this
prefix was hijacked from him.
But honestly I do not what the problem is. Any how, it won't be solved
here.
Regards,
/as
On 21 Aug 2011, at 02:25, David Conrad wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2011, at 6:01 PM
Hi Denis,
That is exactly why you might want to send an abuse msg to Tinet and NTT as
they as accepting the prefixes fromm Portnap.
Erik
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op Aug 21, 2011 om 12:44 heeft Denis Spirin het
volgende geschreven:
> Where do you see the permission of Internap to transit ou
Where do you see the permission of Internap to transit our AS31733?
aut-num: AS31733
as-name: LINKTEL-AS
descr: Link Telecom PJSC
org: ORG-LTP1-RIPE
import: from AS8342 accept ANY
import: from AS12695 accept ANY
import: from AS44109
Of course, we have less customers than we have a year ago. Not a zero in any
case. Some parts of network was rented to other ISPs and will be returned.
Some was NATed after upstream shut down the BGP. How much IP we need now we
will discuss with RIPE NCC, if they will. First, we should have to shut
Hi Erik,
The RIPE DB shows clear Internap have NO permission to route our networks as
the direct uplink. Am I wrong?
2011/8/21 Erik Bais
> Hi Denis,
>
> If Portnap doesn't / won't assist in this matter, you can send an abuse
> message to both Tinet and NTT and have them reject the prefixes on t
Hi Denis,
If Portnap doesn't / won't assist in this matter, you can send an abuse
message to both Tinet and NTT and have them reject the prefixes on their
ingress port.
They will probably only do that in case you have your AS record and route
objects correctly documented and can actually provid
Hi Denis,
Convenient as it may be to use a LIR and their historic provided prefixes,
have you thought about starting with a clean slate ?
If the company was close to bankrupt and one can only assume that it didn't
require a couple /16's and a couple /19's ...
Didn't you get ANY questions from R
22 matches
Mail list logo
