On 15/10/2011 21:25, Geoff Huston wrote:
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
I do. While most of the content of the actual mail has very little
relevance to me, it does provide useful leverage and motivation to fix
some of the networks where I do have influence.
From what I
On 15. Oct 2011, at 19:25 , Geoff Huston wrote:
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
Yes, and if only to tell people that we could do a lot better if we'd care more
about the Net than .. (?)economics(?) ..?
I keep wondering if people generate more elaborated filters based on the
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:50:08 +
Skeeve Stevens ske...@eintellego.net wrote:
John,
Bit hard for Geoff to devnull them, he is the author ;-)
not really, given that he is not the sender, the mailing list is
[snip]
--
John
--
John
Randy,
yes, our ASN landed on polluter list once and we fixed it. I think there is
nothing wrong in sharing that.
Me and few bunch of self acclaimed geeks of our region read it and have done
our level best to remove few polluters but with very less success. Seems
like those who should be reading
aftab,
yes, our ASN landed on polluter list once and we fixed it. I think
there is nothing wrong in sharing that.
thank you, thank you.
Me and few bunch of self acclaimed geeks of our region read it and
have done our level best to remove few polluters but with very less
success.
what
Me and few bunch of self acclaimed geeks of our region read it and
have done our level best to remove few polluters but with very less
success.
what would help?
I guess rpki would help and a banner during every NOG/RIR meeting showing
top polluters.
I seriously don't understand that why an
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
+1
good to get a view from multiple sources even if they are automated. Should
be easy enough to filter for those that do not want them.
Plus it's helped me in the past catch a very massive (well, OK, it was a
less than a hundred unaggregated
Me and few bunch of self acclaimed geeks of our region read it and
have done our level best to remove few polluters but with very less
success.
what would help?
I guess rpki would help
working on it. it will lessen the perceived security benefit of
fragging.
and a banner during every
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
success.
what would help?
I guess rpki would help and a banner during every NOG/RIR meeting showing
top polluters.
A similar thing was done at a USENIX in Monterey over a decade ago. The
point behind that one was to drive home how bad it was
I seriously don't understand that why an RIR can't send atleast a
notice to those announcing bogus prefixes. A letter in RED mailed to
the business address would help.
RIRs claimed in the past that they have nothing to do with routing. of
course, rpki-based origin validation changes this.
So, any chance of putting a banner of top polluters in next APRICOT. :)
^ a/p
i will try to work with the organizers on this
randy
- Original Message -
From: Graham Beneke gra...@apolix.co.za
Perhaps a biggest climbers fallers list would also have more
relevance for the regular report. The Top 30 list doesn't seem to
change very often... ;-)
And now... with the top 30 prefixes in the United States for the week
On Oct 15, 2011, at 11:20 58PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rodney Joffe rjo...@centergate.com
Subject: 13 years ago today - October 16, 1998...
we lost Jon.
It feels like just yesterday.
http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2468.html
My path didn't cross
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
I seriously don't understand that why an RIR can't send atleast a notice to
those announcing bogus prefixes. A letter in RED mailed to the business
address would help.
The RIRs have indicated in the past that they don't see this as their job
even
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 09:39:13 EDT, John Peach said:
not really, given that he is not the sender, the mailing list is
We want to get pedantic, who generated the Message-ID: for the
mail in question? ;)
pgp3yje0gvcXQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:25:56 -0400
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 09:39:13 EDT, John Peach said:
not really, given that he is not the sender, the mailing list is
We want to get pedantic, who generated the Message-ID: for the
mail in question? ;)
I had no
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:06:10 EDT, William F. Maton Sotomayor said:
A similar thing was done at a USENIX in Monterey over a decade ago. The
point behind that one was to drive home how bad it was for the attendees
to use telnet to their boxes at the mothership. Nothing like seeing
people
Baskett, Andrew wrote:
Hi J,
As Patrick mentioned, on-net private Akamai clusters should not be serving
out of your network unless you desire them to or there is a configuration
mistake.
There is a small caveat; we direct users by which DNS they use and not by
end user IP address. So if
18 matches
Mail list logo
