2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
TJ wrote:
I think perhaps you are confusing what must be supported by
implementations (and ignoring the text describing the requirements) as
stated in 6434, with operational usage.
There is not much difference.
I disagree;
2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp:
And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there
is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution.
By who? Sources please.
A few people on NANOG complaining about RA is pretty far from deprecation of RA.
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said:
2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp:
And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there
is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution.
By who? Sources please.
A few people on NANOG
On 12/26/11 12:56 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said:
2011/12/26 Masataka Ohtamo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp:
And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there
is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution.
By
On Dec 26, 2011, at 1:23 46PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
On 12/26/11 12:56 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said:
2011/12/26 Masataka Ohtamo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp:
And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there
is no reason
Op 26 dec 2011, om 20:46 heeft Steven Bellovin het volgende geschreven:
Not quite what you're asking for, but I was very pleasantly surprised to see
that some (at least) Brother printers support IPv6. Progress...
Indeed, my Mac has no issues printing or scanning to my MFC-9465DCN I purchased
Sven,
also various bgp implementations will send the autoconfigure crap ip as the
next-hop instead of the session ip, resulting in all kinds of crap in your
route table (if not fixed with nasty hacks on your end ;) which doesn't
exactly make it easy to figure out which one belongs to which
7 matches
Mail list logo
