Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-30 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 29 Dec 2011, at 0:16 , Doug Barton wrote: On 12/28/2011 03:13, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: However, this has two issues. First, with RAs there are no risks that incorrect default information is propagated because the default gateway itself broadcasts its presence. Unless you have a

Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-30 Thread Masataka Ohta
Ray Soucy wrote: But that is only the case if you let customers have a PI prefix (which I think is really required in a purist end-to-end model, but for the sake of argument...). Multihoming by routing, by the intermediate systems, is against the end to end principle, which is why it does not

RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Vitkovsky, Adam
Actually an a Cisco presentation on Nexus 7k I asked whether it's possible to transport the FCoE over let's say EoMPLS or VPLS and did not get a straight answer though that was half a year ago -but it would be really cool to connect hard-drives directly over continents adam -Original

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Tei
I am php/javascript programmer. The web used to be request/reply. With the request small (but not small enough), and the reply long. But the time for permanent connections is comming. Links from clients to server that are permanent. Or look like that in the application layer. On one sense,

Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-30 Thread Ray Soucy
Well, it seems now you've also added the requirement that we also dramatically re-write all software that makes use of networking. Seemingly for the sake of never admitting that you can be wrong. You seem to think that the OSI model is this nice and clean model that cleanly separates everything

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Ray Soucy
What we really need is a new method of sending data. The fact that I will never be able to send something from Maine to California in less than 15 ms is not acceptable. The speed of light is such a drag. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Tei oscar.vi...@gmail.com wrote: I am php/javascript

RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Vitkovsky, Adam
Well hopefully we won't need to worry about the speed of light anymore Just recently I heard about the experiments with quantum nonlocality no one seem to understand how it happens but for me it's enough it works Basically when 2 photons or electrons are emitted form the same source -they are

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Ray Soucy
Are you telling me that the 1,100 miles of fiber I just had run is already obsolete? Someone is going to get fired over this. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam avitkov...@emea.att.com wrote: Well hopefully we won't need to worry about the speed of light anymore Just recently I

L3 consequences of WLAN offload in cellular networks (was - endless DHCPv6 thread)

2011-12-30 Thread Alexander Harrowell
In the DHCP v6 thread, there was some discussion of mobility and its IP layer consequences. As various people pointed out, cellular networks basically handle this in the RAN (Radio Access Network) and therefore at layer 2, transparently (well, as much as things ever are) for IP purposes. It

Re: L3 consequences of WLAN offload in cellular networks (was - endless DHCPv6 thread)

2011-12-30 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Dec 30, 2011 9:16 AM, Alexander Harrowell a.harrow...@gmail.com wrote: In the DHCP v6 thread, there was some discussion of mobility and its IP layer consequences. As various people pointed out, cellular networks basically handle this in the RAN (Radio Access Network) and therefore at layer

RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Vitkovsky, Adam
Article by John Cramer says: At the AQRTP Workshop we considered the question of whether quantum nonlocality was a possible medium for FTL communication. In the context of standard quantum mechanics there is good reason for believing that it is not. Eberhard has proved a theorem demonstrating

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - From: Adam Vitkovsky avitkov...@emea.att.com Article by John Cramer says: At the AQRTP Workshop we considered the question of whether quantum nonlocality was a possible medium for FTL communication. In the context of standard quantum mechanics there is good

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Jared Mauch
On Dec 30, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Tei wrote: I am not dumb, I know turning webpages into applications make webpages to fragile. But I am scared of javascripts. Javascript is just too dawmn usefull now, browsers too broken (mostly IE), and Javascript is like a superhero that fix all. The web is

Re: L3 consequences of WLAN offload in cellular networks (was - endless DHCPv6 thread)

2011-12-30 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:34 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: The state of the industry is the support of nomadic mobility from cellular to / from Wi-Fi , there is nearly no support of mobile IP that I have seen. Concur. This .pdf preso may also be of interest:

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread David Barak
From: Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net (I'm hoping for some good snow storms in the midwest/north east/NoVA area to put some good stresses on the network for a week or so this winter that can be measured/observed). In DC and NoVA, the network which is most taxed by snow storms is the

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Tom Limoncelli
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote: What we really need is a new method of sending data.  The fact that I will never be able to send something from Maine to California in less than 15 ms is not acceptable. The speed of light is such a drag. I propose that

Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-30 Thread Kevin Loch
Steven Bellovin wrote: VRRP? The Router Discovery Protocol (RFC 1256). But given how much more reliable routers are today than in 1984, I'm not convinced it's that necessary these days. VRRP is an absolutely essential protocol in today's Internet. We use it on every non-bgp customer port.

Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-30 Thread Ray Soucy
VRRP is still useful, and for those who find it useful it has been extended to IPv6 [RFC5798]. Vendors, such as Cisco, have already begun shipping functional implementations as well it would seem. There are certainly pieces of IPv6 that will need refinement (and we will likely see that happen

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Tony Varriale
On 12/29/2011 9:06 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: (you forgot to change subj:) On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Cameron Byrnecb.li...@gmail.com wrote: Next topic, ethernet is too chaotic and inefficient to deploy and support mission critical applications in LAN or WAN or data center. yes,

Weekly Routing Table Report

2011-12-30 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to

RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Vadim Antonov
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 14:00 +0100, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote: Well hopefully we won't need to worry about the speed of light anymore Nope. The laws of physics as currently understood prohibit sending information faster than the speed of light. (The reality of FTL neutrino thingie is still too early

Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-30 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 12/30/11 08:47 , Kevin Loch wrote: It is very common to have different routers (routers, firewalls or load balancers) on the same vlan with different functions in hosting environments. It is also sometimes necessary to have multiple default gateways on the same vlan for load balancing or

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:40:35 PST, Vadim Antonov said: faster than the speed of light. (The reality of FTL neutrino thingie is still too early to tell). Especially if you actually *read* the actual journal article rather than the pop-sci interpretation of it, it basically says our experiment had

Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-30 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 29 Dec 2011, at 13:46 , Masataka Ohta wrote: we must assume MTU of 1280B. But, as IPv6 extension headers can be as lengthy as 1000B or 2000B, no applications are guaranteed to work over IPv6. As IP is an unreliable datagram service, there are no guarantees, period. The presence of

BGP Update Report

2011-12-30 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report Interval: 22-Dec-11 -to- 29-Dec-11 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS42116 154161 9.8%2802.9 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom Holding 2 - AS8402

The Cidr Report

2011-12-30 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Dec 30 21:12:17 2011 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-30 Thread Christian Esteve
Multihoming with multiple addresses works at transport/application layer over existing IPv4 and IPv6. May be there is some light with Multipath TCP: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/slides/mptcp-0.pdf http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mptcp/charter/ If you can live without UDP and other issues

RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Robert Bonomi
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Dec 30 07:03:54 2011 From: Vitkovsky, Adam avitkov...@emea.att.com To: Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu, Tei oscar.vi...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:00:16 +0100 Subject: RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Cc:

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - From: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com Of course there are still these issues with probabilities at quantum level I *strongy* recommend that anyone pursuing this subject read Dr. Asimov's essays on resublimated thiotimoline. As well as Spider

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

2011-12-30 Thread Joe Hamelin
From: Vitkovsky, Adam avitkov...@emea.att.com -also there some attempts to actually send the information 50 micro sec back in time Please don't let the high-frequency stock traders get a hold of this. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474