I'm sorry but I have failed to understand the grammar of these bizarre posts.
Is it just me or do they actually make very little sense?
What is perhaps scary is that I know somebody who talks just like that (i.e.
makes little sense) and I really thought it may be them... It isn't because
they
- Original Message -
From: Leigh Porter leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com
I'm sorry but I have failed to understand the grammar of these bizarre
posts. Is it just me or do they actually make very little sense?
UNaltered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT information is
Never said it was *perfect*. But you probably haven't a good (in CV
terms at least) prorgrammer assigned to you but didn't know the
difference between a TCP port and an IP protocol number. Or the
difference between an Ethernet and an IP address.
For me at least (and I grant you that everyone's
My organization is looking into various software-defined switches for
some dynamic firewall and virtualization applications. Can anyone here
speak about experience with IBM/BNT VMready or OpenFlow or specifically
about the BNT G8264? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
--
Daniel M.
I've played on both sides of the fence of this one, but I think the key
piece is that you have to get enough software engineering for your tool
to fit the life cycle it needs to follow and enough domain specific
knowledge to for the tool to do what it exists to do. If you lack
*either* of
Global NAPs seemingly shutdown all tandem services last week and it is
causing major congestion issues with routing calls. Anyone have more
information on this mess as it seems to be in it's 4th day?
Thanks
Mark Stevens
Bankruptcy liquidation.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Stevens mana...@monmouth.com
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Mon Mar 05 13:46:15 2012
Subject: Global Naps?
Global NAPs seemingly shutdown all tandem services last week and it is
causing major congestion issues with
Scott, I fully agree with you. In fact, I was just commenting on *my*
experiences and never implied that they would / should apply the same
for everyone.
cheers!
Carlos
On 3/5/12 3:53 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
I've played on both sides of the fence of this one, but I think the
key piece is that
Seems some carriers ignored the fact GNAPs was shutting down and are
still trying route calls to them which then causes a serious post dial
delay while route advancing is taking place. I hope some carriers read
this thread and check their routing.
Mark
On 3/5/2012 1:56 PM, Bill Woodcock
Given my experience to date with the assumptions made by programers about
networking in the following:
Apps (iOS apps, Droid apps, etc.)
Consumer Electronics
Microcontrollers
Home Routers
I have to say that the strategy being used to date, whichever one it is, is
2012/3/2 Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
In my experience the path of least resistance is to get a junior
network engineer and mentor he/she into improving his/hers programming
skills than go the other way around.
and then the organization pays forever to maintain the crap code while
the
2012/3/5 Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
Given my experience to date with the assumptions made by programers about
networking in the following:
Apps (iOS apps, Droid apps, etc.)
Consumer Electronics
Microcontrollers
Home Routers
I have to say that the strategy
Owen,
I'd say that everyone's PoV on this is going to be experience
driven. I've seen both approaches work (and both fail) and IMO the
determining factor was matching the right approach with the project.
I don't believe that you can develop a large scale project (large scale
being a
Anyone have a clueful road runner contact?
-Dan
Every six months or so, I poll the mailing list for links to your
favorite status pages for carriers, web services, and the like, to
add to the Dashboard page at
http://www.outages.org
If you have any you like, which you know are still working, and are
publicly accessible, that you'd like
Wile E Coyote knows all about him.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 3/5/2012 3:26 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
Anyone have a clueful road runner contact?
-Dan
FYI, picking an existing message, hitting reply, and then changing the
subject line is not a good way to start a new thread. It causes your
message to appear in an odd location for those of us who use threaded
mail readers, and may cause your message to be ignored altogether.
hth,
Doug
On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
Owen,
I'd say that everyone's PoV on this is going to be experience driven.
I've seen both approaches work (and both fail) and IMO the determining factor
was matching the right approach with the project. I don't believe that you
can
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
However, the bigger problem (from my experience-driven
POV) is that it is not so intuitively obvious that developing
a network-based product using a team consisting entirely
of developers who view the network as an unnecessarily
On 03/05/2012 03:46 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
However, the bigger problem (from my experience-driven POV) is that it is not
so intuitively obvious that developing a network-based product using a team
consisting entirely of developers who view the network as an unnecessarily
complicated serial
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
However, the bigger problem (from my experience-driven POV) is that it
is not so intuitively obvious that developing a network-based product
using a team consisting entirely of developers who view the network as
an unnecessarily complicated serial port
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
Admittedly we (the 'network guys') don't always make it easy for them. RFCs
get obsoleted by newer RFCs, but the newer RFCs might still reference items
from the original RFC, etc. This can turn into developing
About (5 thru 6)
Hard to keep a straight face in front of a customer when, after
assigning him a IP in our 192.172.250.0 range...
... He ask why are we NATing using private IP's.
We also had plenty of experience with ppl getting confused about
16, 17.
Your could add L2
In message CAAAwwbXPpNEU_aKgUe=9si2zayn30+nmrhosv2t4ag5fuet...@mail.gmail.com
, Jimmy Hess writes:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
Admittedly we (the 'network guys') don't always make it easy for them. RF=
Cs
get obsoleted by newer RFCs,
if I may chime in -
It is the nature of the corporate-beast which has changed.
When I was starting out in the 80's and even through the early 90's network eng
and sys eng went hand in hand.
Today it is far more silo'd. NetEng, SysEng are very *distinct* and as a result
different groups today
25 matches
Mail list logo
