Re: SORBS?!

2012-04-05 Thread Sam Oduor
Some of the IP's I manage got blacklisted and its true they were spamming and Sorbs had a very valid reason for blacklisting them. I got this response response from sorbs after resolving the problem amicably. Sorbs responded well on time. *Your request appear to have been resolved. If you have

RE: SORBS?!

2012-04-05 Thread Drew Weaver
Now, if we could only teach Senderbase that if their customers receive 'questionable' smtp traffic from 1 IP address in a /24 it doesn't mean that all IP addresses in that /24 are malicious we'd really be living it up in 2012. -Original Message- From: Sam Oduor

SIP Carrier Consolidation

2012-04-05 Thread Elijah Savage
Anyone here that have gone through the process of SIP trunking consolidation care to comment offline on Whom do you utilize? What has been your experience operationally? What was your experience during transition/implementation? Thank you ahead of time.

RE: SORBS?!

2012-04-05 Thread goemon
This is often the only way to get peoples attention and get action. Providers dont care about individual /32's and will let them sit around and spew nigerian scams and pill spams without any consequences. But they will care about a /24. -Dan On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Drew Weaver wrote: Now, if

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

2012-04-05 Thread George B.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com wrote: I too had with nesol years ago. It required special phone calls to special people to update. Customer support never knew what was going on regarding or IPvWhat?. I suspect all of the people there that know

Re: SORBS?!

2012-04-05 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 05/04/2012 17:48, goe...@anime.net wrote: But they will care about a /24. I'm curious as to why they would want to stop at /24. If you're going to take the shotgun approach, why not blacklist the entire ASN? Nick

Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation

2012-04-05 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
SIP trunking consolidation is buzzword heavy and context-light. What problem are you trying to solve and at what scale? Do you have a requirement to have the provider be a traditional TDM-based organization or is an aggregator sufficient? How price-sensitive are you? At fairly small scale (10

Re: SORBS?!

2012-04-05 Thread PC
That's probably a better idea. I moved into a /24 ip block that was SWIPed to me that they reported was dynamic cable/DSL users (no spam history, mind you). Didn't matter, I couldn't send e-mail. When trying to get it delisted I had a TTL on the zone that was incompatible with their standards

Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation

2012-04-05 Thread Elijah Savage
Thank you for the reply. Yes an aggregator, large deployment. Initially this is discovery, though price is always important it is most about understanding operations and implementation at this point. - Original Message - From: Robert E. Seastrom r...@seastrom.com To: Elijah Savage

Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation

2012-04-05 Thread Daryl G. Jurbala
I have to respond with the sentiments of Robert: large is a very relative term. Also, are we talking about origination or termination here? How many minutes a day of each? What's your ACD? What are your top destinations? If it's bursty like a call center how many concurrent calls? You can't

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

2012-04-05 Thread bmanning
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:26:11AM -0700, George B. wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com wrote: I too had with nesol years ago. It required special phone calls to special people to update. Customer support never knew what was going on regarding