I doubt it since no v6 address is listed in dns for facebook.com or
www.facebook.com
-Grant
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Kyle Creyts wrote:
> Could they be testing switching to v6 on the regular domain?
> On Apr 13, 2012 2:00 AM, "Graham Beneke" wrote:
>
> > On 11/04/2012 09:16, Frank Bulk
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> > The current Mac mini "Server" model sports an i7 2.0GHz quad-core CPU
> > and up to 16GB RAM (see OWC for that, IIRC). =A0Two drives, up to 750GB
> > each, or SSD's if you prefer.
>
> The Mac mini server is quite intringuing with that low po
Could they be testing switching to v6 on the regular domain?
On Apr 13, 2012 2:00 AM, "Graham Beneke" wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 09:16, Frank Bulk wrote:
>
>> It's been down three times today, first from 2:58 pm to 5:58 pm Central,
>> and
>> then again from 7:59 pm to 9:58 pm, and then again from 10:
Storage capable of keeping up with 10G/20G packet capture doesn't have to
be extremely expensive...
We build this with a commodity host, multiple 10G, multiple SAS HBAs each
attached to a JBOD enclosure of at least 36 4TB 7.2k commodity sata3 disks.
In our configuration, this delivers 58 TB per JB
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> The current Mac mini "Server" model sports an i7 2.0GHz quad-core CPU
> and up to 16GB RAM (see OWC for that, IIRC). Two drives, up to 750GB
> each, or SSD's if you prefer.
The Mac mini server is quite intringuing with that low power
requiremen
Once upon a time, Jeroen van Aart said:
> There may be a performance penalty using raid4, because it uses one
> parity disk. Although that system looks like it can be useful for some
> purposes it looks less ideal for home use. Also I don't see how it would
> allow you to install your own OS.
>> Are you paying Trend for access to these? If not, you're not getting
>> any answers from them and they're not blocking anything.
>
>Do they return a canned answer that says "don't block", or do you get
>to wait for a DNS timeout?
Is there some reason you're asking random people rather than spe
i have not tested to see who catches what. not really into spam
research. just trying to reduce it for a server.
randy
dnslists = dialups.mail-abuse.org \
: rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org \
Are you paying Trend for access to these?
yes, i have an arrangement
I used to pay (not very much) but realized several years ago that after
using the Spamhaus lists, MAPS didn't catch any
Interesting setup you have there!! From the session, do you have
configs for the different scenarios that were tested and what kind of
'issues' were unearthed?
Regards
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Pierre-Yves Maunier wrote:
> http://g6.asso.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ipv6-launch-lab.pdf
10 matches
Mail list logo
