**
[image: isoc-hk] http://isoc.hkThe Internet Society's Hong Kong
Chapter (ISOC HK http://www.isoc.hk/), continuing its pioneering series
of IPv6 events, will mark today June 6 2012 Global IPv6 Launch with a
seminar: 'Is Asia Pacific and China doing well on IPv6
Op 5-6-2012 23:23, William Herrin schreef:
On 6/5/12, David Hubbarddhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Hi David,
Instead of going the book route, I'd suggest getting some tunneled
addresses from he.net and then working through
http://ipv6.he.net/certification/ .
They have the basics pretty
One more (free) book:
http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroomid=8281
(available in several languages)
**
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:44:59 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
Second, you are correct. All L2 bridges for a given media type
should support the largest configurable MTU for that media
type, so, it is arguably a design flaw in the bridges. However,
in an environment where you have broken L2 devices
On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:23 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On 6/5/12, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Does anyone have suggestions on good books to really get
a thorough understanding of v6, subnetting, security practices,
etc. Or a few books. Just turned up dual stack with our
Owen DeLong wrote:
Given the combination of Moore's law and the deployment
lifecycle, designs we do today in this regard can be expected
to last ~12 years or more, so they should be prepared for
at least 16x. At 1,600 Gbps, that puts our target maximum
MTU up around 200M octets.
If
Owen DeLong wrote:
Really, no. The L3 MTU on an interface should be configured to the
lowest MTU reachable via that link without crossing a router. It's
just that simple. Anything else _IS_ a misconfiguration.
Perhaps this should be thought of as a limitation, rather then a feature.
Joe
Hello all,
Does anyone have a contact at either DENIC or Fundação IT MEDIA Universidade
de Bissao that can advise if registrations are currently being accepted for
.GW domain names? The IANA admin contact,
ad...@register.gw, is at a domain with no valid MX records (or A records, for
that
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Cutler James R james.cut...@consultant.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:23 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On 6/5/12, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Does anyone have suggestions on good books to really get
a thorough understanding of v6, subnetting,
A non-cut off version is here: http://sdrv.ms/MeQl1L
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Smith, Courtney
courtney_sm...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
I am having trouble view the slides for this morning's presentation by
Vijay Gill. It appears conversion from power point to a PDF cropped the
slides.
I started monitoring IPv6 access to www.netflix.com after seeing this
posting
(http://www.personal.psu.edu/dvm105/blogs/ipv6/2012/06/netflix-is-back.html)
and what I found, over the week, was that access was coming and going
(www.premieronline.net/~fbulk/netflix.png). But not because of IPv6
On (2012-06-06 06:57 -0700), vijay gill wrote:
A non-cut off version is here: http://sdrv.ms/MeQl1L
For me provisioning automatically has always been quite trivial problem,
system just has object representation of service with references to other
objects and then those objects are used to fill
Anton Smith an...@huge.geek.nz a écrit sur 06/06/2012 09:53:02 AM :
Potentially silly question but, as Bill points out a LAN always
occupies a /64.
Does this imply that we would have large L2 segments with a large
number of hosts on them? What about the age old discussion about
keeping
Re Ben,
b...@bencarleton.com (Ben Carleton) wrote:
Does anyone have a contact at either DENIC or Fundação IT MEDIA
Universidade de Bissao that can advise if registrations are currently being
accepted for .GW domain names? The IANA admin contact,
ad...@register.gw, is at a domain with no
Does anyone know the reason /64 was proposed as the size for all L2 domains?
I've looked for this answer before, never found a good one. I thought I
read there are some L2 technologies that use a 64 bit hardware address,
might have been Bluetooth. Guaranteeing that ALL possible hosts could live
On Jun 6, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Anton Smith wrote:
snip
Hi all,
Potentially silly question but, as Bill points out a LAN always occupies a
/64.
Does this imply that we would have large L2 segments with a large
number of hosts on them? What about the age old discussion about
keeping
A few more words on MTU. What we are after is accommodation
of MTU diversity - not any one specific size. Practical limit
is (2^32 - 1) for IPv6, but we expect smaller sizes for the
near term. Operators know how to configure MTUs appropriate
for their links. 1280 is too small, and turns the IPv6
Thus spake Chuck Church (chuckchu...@gmail.com) on Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at
10:58:05AM -0400:
Does anyone know the reason /64 was proposed as the size for all L2 domains?
Some day eui-48 will run out. So, just assume eui-64 now and map into it.
Also, as you point out below, not all L2 is
All,
We are working on a project with the University of Michigan related with
studying the evolution of .com/.net zones
Does anyone have copies of .com / .net zone files around the beginning of 2011?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
-manish
Hello all,
In light of World IPv6 Launch day, I would like to raise awareness for RFC5549,
Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information with an IPv6 Next Hop
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5549).
As far as I'm aware of, this RFC has yet to be implemented by any vendors so
far but
On 6/5/12 3:40 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
There are number of operational models that provide the needed
routing protection without enumeration.
I can see a use-case for something like:
Build me a prefix list from the RIR data
this requires a full data fetch, not doable in dns.
and, at the
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Manish Karir wrote:
All,
We are working on a project with the University of Michigan related
with studying the evolution of .com/.net zones
Does anyone have copies of .com / .net zone files around the
beginning of 2011?
Any help would be greatly
It is because of IEEE EUI-64 standard.
It was believed at the time of IPv6 development that EUI-48 would run out of
numbers and IEEE had proposed going to EUI-64. While IEEE still hasn't
quite made that change (though Firewire does appear to use EUI-64 already),
it will likely occur prior to the
On 06/06/2012 03:05 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
It is because of IEEE EUI-64 standard.
It was believed at the time of IPv6 development that EUI-48 would run out of
numbers and IEEE had proposed going to EUI-64. While IEEE still hasn't
quite made that change (though Firewire does appear to use EUI-64
On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I started monitoring IPv6 access to www.netflix.com after seeing this
posting
(http://www.personal.psu.edu/dvm105/blogs/ipv6/2012/06/netflix-is-back.html)
and what I found, over the week, was that access was coming and going
On Jun 6, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:05 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
It is because of IEEE EUI-64 standard.
It was believed at the time of IPv6 development that EUI-48 would run out of
numbers and IEEE had proposed going to EUI-64. While IEEE still hasn't
quite made
On 06/06/2012 06:34, Ben Carleton wrote:
Hello all,
Does anyone have a contact at either DENIC or Fundação IT MEDIA
Universidade de Bissao that can advise if registrations are currently being
accepted for .GW domain names? The IANA admin contact,
ad...@register.gw, is at a domain
On 6/6/2012 9:34 AM, Ben Carleton wrote:
Hello all,
Does anyone have a contact at either DENIC or Fundação IT MEDIA
Universidade de Bissao that can advise if registrations are currently being
accepted for .GW domain names? The IANA admin contact,
ad...@register.gw, is at a domain with
Owen DeLong wrote:
It is because of IEEE EUI-64 standard.
Right, so far.
It was believed at the time of IPv6 development that EUI-48 would run out of
numbers and IEEE had proposed going to EUI-64. While IEEE still hasn't
quite made that change (though Firewire does appear to use EUI-64
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 10:35 -0400,
jean-francois.tremblay...@videotron.com wrote:
The ND noise generated is arguably higher than ARP because of DAD,
but I don't remember seeing actual numbers on this (anybody?).
I've seen links with up to 15k devices where ARP represented
a significant part
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:53:02 +0100, Anton Smith said:
Potentially silly question but, as Bill points out a LAN always occupies a
/64.
Does this imply that we would have large L2 segments with a large
number of hosts on them? What about the age old discussion about
keeping broadcast
Owen DeLong wrote:
Because bigger packets makes it rather circuit switching than
packet switching, which is the way to lose.
Er... No. It's attitudes like this that killed ATM.
ATM committed suicide because its slow target speed (64Kbps
voice) and inappropriate QoS theory required small cell
In message 5f907bc1-9344-4187-ba12-ceaf7e1c3...@bjencks.net, Ben Jencks write
s:
On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I started monitoring IPv6 access to www.netflix.com after seeing this
posting
=
(http://www.personal.psu.edu/dvm105/blogs/ipv6/2012/06/netflix-is-back.htm=
l)
Sorry to be the bearer of such bad tidings. Please note that I'm doing a
quick copy/paste from a notification I received. I've edited it a bit.
Please note that LinkedIn has weighed in with a carefully worded blog post:
http://blog.linkedin.com/2012/06/06/linkedin-member-passwords-compromised/
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Lynda shr...@deaddrop.org wrote:
Sorry to be the bearer of such bad tidings. Please note that I'm doing a
quick copy/paste from a notification I received. I've edited it a bit.
Please note that LinkedIn has weighed in with a carefully worded blog post:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Marshall Eubanks
marshall.euba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Lynda shr...@deaddrop.org wrote:
In other words, if you have a LinkedIn account, expect that the password has
been stolen. Go change your password now. If you used that password
Lurker speaking... beware...
I have been talking with some folks from various industries about
configuration systems ala Bcfg2, Puppet, Chef, and others. Many of
them care far too much about the current nodes configuration status as
some admin had logged in and changed something. I am authoring
Jonathan
That is the exact question I have asked myself many times. All of the
major players in Configuration management have a client program that
must run and at times requires some libraries that are newer than the
platforms a company may need to support or that clients may wish
supported.
On 6/6/12, Aaron C. de Bruyn aa...@heyaaron.com wrote:
[snip]
One local password used everywhere that can't be compromised through
website stupidity...
One local password is an excellent idea of course.
Remote servers directly handling user created credentials should be appended
to the list
39 matches
Mail list logo
