Quantifying the business costs would be very complex.
Here are some reports and research papers that may be a starting point:
[1] Juniper Networks, Inc., “What's Behind Network Downtime?,” pp.
1–12, May 2008.
[2] R. Mahajan, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson, “Understanding BGP
misconfiguratio
On 8/1/2012 10:32 PM, steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA)
> mailto:math...@hawaii.edu>> wrote:
>
>
> It it is of interest...
>
>
> https://www.change.org/petitions/from-educause-higher-ed-wireless-networking-admin-group
>
>
>
> I was not a
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA)
wrote:
>
> It it is of interest...
>
>
> https://www.change.org/petitions/from-educause-higher-ed-wireless-networking-admin-group
I was not aware of this limitation. Android and other Chrome devices do not
have issues like these. Wow.
--ste
On 07/30/2012 10:57 AM, Steven Noble wrote:
The fix for this issue is trivial. Every new signup should require a sponsor or
a deposit of funds into a new member fund. Once a member has made a relevant
post regarding a NANOG related item their funds are returned.
If someone spams they forfeit t
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Diogo Montagner
wrote:
> Hi Darius,
>
> You are right. The lost of a customer due to those things. However, I
> would classify this as an unknown situation (in terms of risk
> analisys) because the others I mentioned are possible to calculate and
> estimate (they ar
On 8/1/12, Diogo Montagner wrote:
I think it's more complicated than that, the cost of misconfiguration
is almost inseparable
in some cases from the cost of configuration in general.; not all
misconfigs are equal, so you might want to concentrate on a specific
kind of misconfiguration, or a spe
also responds here in Ohio on TW
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Henry Stryker wrote:
>
>
> On 08/01/12 16:22 , Robert Glover wrote:
> > We are having issues with getting responses from these servers:
> >
> > NSMEDCTR1.UCSFMEDICALCENTER.ORG
> > NSMEDCTR2.UCSFMEDICALCENTER.ORG
> >
> > Which are a
On 08/01/12 16:22 , Robert Glover wrote:
> We are having issues with getting responses from these servers:
>
> NSMEDCTR1.UCSFMEDICALCENTER.ORG
> NSMEDCTR2.UCSFMEDICALCENTER.ORG
>
> Which are authoritative for "ucsfmedctr.org" and "ucsfmedicalcenter.org".
Those servers respond to my queries fr
Hi Darius,
You are right. The lost of a customer due to those things. However, I
would classify this as an unknown situation (in terms of risk
analisys) because the others I mentioned are possible to calculate and
estimate (they are known). But it is very hard to estimate if a
customer will cancel
> I am looking for literature on the (monetary) costs of
> misconfigurations in an operational ISP network. Are there any such
> studies I can benefit from?
jgs, who should know, says 42 quatloos
randy
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Diogo Montagner
wrote:
> A misconfiguration will, at least, impact on two points: network
> outage and re-work. For the network outage, you have to use the SLAs
> to calculate the cost (how much you lost from the customers' revenue)
> due to that outage. On the othe
Hi Murat,
I never saw any literature about this topic. But I think it is not too
difficult to calculate (or estimate).
A misconfiguration will, at least, impact on two points: network
outage and re-work. For the network outage, you have to use the SLAs
to calculate the cost (how much you lost fro
Hi all,
I am looking for literature on the (monetary) costs of misconfigurations in an
operational ISP network. Are there any such studies I can benefit from?
In a larger context, are there any thorough studies exploring the cost of
building and running a large ISP network?
Best,
-Murat
=
On 08/01/2012 10:51 AM, Robert Glover wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there anyone with clue from UCSF on-list? Or if someone knows how to
> put me in contact with them, that would be great.
>
> We are not able to query their DNS servers from our network. We've got
> users not able to access anything UC
In message <50196c8e.60...@garlic.com>, Robert Glover writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is there anyone with clue from UCSF on-list? Or if someone knows how to
> put me in contact with them, that would be great.
>
> We are not able to query their DNS servers from our network. We've got
> users not able to
It it is of interest...
https://www.change.org/petitions/from-educause-higher-ed-wireless-networking-admin-group
All the best.
--
/
* Dr. Robert Mathews, D.Phil.
* Distinguished Senior Research Scholar
* National Security Affairs & U.S Industrial
One thing to be mindful of is that BSoD support may not be prevelant
in the installed modem base of your MSO. Replacing those modems would
be costly for someone.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, iptech wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Thanks for the feedback,
>
> yes this is how I understand it also, howe
Looking for experiences regarding their DNS hosting services. Anyone
have a story to share? Off-list replies would be great.
thanks,
~matt
Ditto on that from TWTC in Milwaukee, WI.
# dig www.ucsf.edu @ucsfns2.ucsf.edu
; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> www.ucsf.edu @ucsfns2.ucsf.edu
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 49793
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL
On 08/01/12 10:51 , Robert Glover wrote:
> We are not able to query their DNS servers from our network. We've got
> users not able to access anything UCSF due to this.
I am querying them OK. I am in US AZ. I am also able to reach
manana.garlic.com.
[hyperion]/usr/local# dig www.ucsf.edu @uc
Hello,
Is there anyone with clue from UCSF on-list? Or if someone knows how to
put me in contact with them, that would be great.
We are not able to query their DNS servers from our network. We've got
users not able to access anything UCSF due to this.
Thus far, their response has been to manua
I did PPPoE for open access on cable networks starting back in DOCSIS
1.0 and that (and PPTP for that matter) is a dead end IMO. Get to
BSoD/TLS which is a CableLabs (the guys who write and test the DOCSIS
spec) standard and will be supported on all of the D3 chassis no matter
if its Arris, Ci
Ray,
Yes PITA indeed.
Our 7200 are G2, but we were still planning on moving away from them.
I presume you guys are staying on the 7200s meantime, to accomodate the
PPTP requirement?
Thanks,
On 7/31/2012 10:35 PM, Ray Burkholder wrote:
As far as I can tell, and from my conversations with th
We ended up using something like this to separate out the traffic at
layer 2 for each ISP:
http://www.cablelabs.com/cablemodem/downloads/specs/CM-SP-L2VPN-I03-061222.pdf
Look at section 5.1.2 Multiple ISP L2VPNs
Basically the modems get DHCP & their config from the cable operator but
the CPEs
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the feedback,
yes this is how I understand it also, however I find it strange that the
Cisco platform designated as the future LNS will not accommodate the
DOCSIS 3.0requirements - not much collaboration. There is no roadmap for
introcducing PPTP on the ASR1K that I can s
Hey Michael,
Thanks for the feedback.
From the scenarios below, I think that option 3 would be more feasible,
i.e BSoD L2VPN, via pw. Our max expected number of sessions would not
exceed 10k, so probably not an hw limiting issue for us.
For option 4, we cannot accommodate this, as we are mov
26 matches
Mail list logo
