On Sep 23, 2012, at 12:43 AM, Peter Phaal wrote:
In both cases the router is generating the telemetry, in the netflow
case, packets are sampled on the router, the router builds flow
records based on the contents of the sampled packets, and the flow
records are exported. In the sFlow case,
On Sep 23, 2012, at 7:55 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
If the *flow generation process is not performed on the router (or otherwise
conveyed by some metadata outside of raw [sampled] packet headers) then you
lose visibility to ingress and egress ifIndex (interface) information --
information
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Sep 23, 2012, at 7:55 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
If the *flow generation process is not performed on the router (or otherwise
conveyed by some metadata outside of raw [sampled] packet headers) then
you lose
Hello everybody,
I am using C7206 VXR NPE-G2 routers as BRAS in my network and the current
IOS is *c7200p-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T.bin* on them.
Also their memory upgraded to 2GB instead of 1GB.
And I have near 6500 online user on each of my BRAS and there is no
speciefic feature except aaa
6000 PPP users on a NPE-G2 is way too much imho. Currently we do no more
than 3000 users on a NPE-G2 with PPPoA. (Max cpu 50%).
5 years ago, we did about 5000 users on a NPE-G2, but as traffic ratio's
grow each year the maximum users a NPE-G2 can handle will drop each
year. Don't forget an
On Sep 23, 2012, at 11:23 PM, Peter Phaal wrote:
The difference between packet oriented or flow oriented export is an
implementation detail if your only requirement is to obtain layer IP flow
records, but becomes significant if you want to create customized flow
records or create packet
Which software you used before for them?
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Rinse Kloek rinse.kl...@isp.solcon.nlwrote:
6000 PPP users on a NPE-G2 is way too much imho. Currently we do no more
than 3000 users on a NPE-G2 with PPPoA. (Max cpu 50%).
5 years ago, we did about 5000 users on a
For this application, you may wish to consider the service provider images.
The latest 15.x(S) image works, as it is the derivative of what was
formerly the service-provider oriented 12.2(SRx) images.
However, it's unlikely to drop steady state CPU, but it may contain some
optimizations for
Second, in the hotspot scenarios where this is likely to be a problem
(in IPv4 -or- IPv6) it's addressed by the AP isolation feature
that's getting close to omnipresent even in the low end APs. With this
feature enabled, stations are not allowed to talk to each other over
the wlan; they can
Dear Paul,
Thanks for you reply, May I have those optimization knobs for
virtual-template and throttles?
Maybe looking into your configurations help me in this field.
I will look for the service provider image too.
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:17 PM, PC paul4...@gmail.com wrote:
For this
You are joking I hope
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-09-23, at 3:38 PM, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Paul,
Thanks for you reply, May I have those optimization knobs for
virtual-template and throttles?
Maybe looking into your configurations help me in this field.
I
why joking Mark?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Mark Gauvin mgau...@dryden.ca wrote:
You are joking I hope
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-09-23, at 3:38 PM, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Paul,
Thanks for you reply, May I have those optimization knobs for
- Original Message -
From: Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com
On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
And this is pretty much precisely why I'm hammering the nail;
there's
*lots* of stuff that could -- and properly should -- be technology
assisted at the world's largest
On 9/23/12, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Do FCC regs actually permit that, license-free-band be damned?
[snip]
In the US, operation of 802.11 WiFi devices in the unlicensed bands
is authorized under part 15 of FCC regulations only; LICENSED radio
operators, may be able to operate
I think you mean ATT / wayport. They have ruined a number of hotels that I
stay at. When you talk to support they always claim unusual event load due to
the guests involved.
I'm not expecting 50mbps in the room, but not getting past 256k or 512k defeats
the purpose of asking me to offload
Jo Rhett said:
One of which I forgot to mention. Many of the hotels (I believe all
Hilton properties at this time) have sold the facilities space for
their wifi network to another company.
PSAV is the company. I just installed about 20 Cisco WiFi radios at the
Doubletree (a Hilton prop) at
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:50 PM, JÁKÓ András jako.and...@eik.bme.hu wrote:
Second, in the hotspot scenarios where this is likely to be a problem
(in IPv4 -or- IPv6) it's addressed by the AP isolation feature
that's getting close to omnipresent even in the low end APs. With this
feature
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Acisco.com+ios+broadband+aggregation+guide
On 9/23/12 1:50 PM, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote:
why joking Mark?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Mark Gauvin mgau...@dryden.ca wrote:
You are joking I hope
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-09-23, at 3:38 PM, Shahab
18 matches
Mail list logo
