I know how to use Google dear Mark, but I mean which configuration is
working succesfully in their network.
I am currently using this config:
bba-group pppoe TEST
virtual-template 1
sessions per-mac limit 2
sessions per-vlan limit 5000
sessions per-vc throttle 15 30 300
sessions per-mac
just a small comment: As far as I understand AP isolation doesn't work
if you don't have a WLAN controller but do have more than one APs. E.g. in
the following setup
ap1--sw1--sw2--ap2
with AP isolation turned on, clients associated to ap1 cannot
communicate directly with other
Peter Phaal peter.ph...@gmail.com wrote on 09/23/2012 12:23:57 PM:
Exporting packet oriented measurements doesn't mean that you have to
loose ingress/egress interface data. In the specific example being
discussed (sFlow export), detailed forwarding information from the
router forwarding plane
On 2012-09-24 14:48 , Joe Loiacono wrote:
Peter Phaal peter.ph...@gmail.com wrote on 09/23/2012 12:23:57 PM:
Exporting packet oriented measurements doesn't mean that you have to
loose ingress/egress interface data.
Note that you get these in NetFlow too. Depends on which version you
pick or
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Joe Loiacono jloia...@csc.com wrote:
Peter Phaal peter.ph...@gmail.com wrote on 09/23/2012 12:23:57 PM:
Exporting packet oriented measurements doesn't mean that you have to
loose ingress/egress interface data. In the specific example being
discussed (sFlow
I'm tech-reading an upcoming book, and it makes the implication that 802.1x
is not very widely deployed... which seems possibly an overly narrow view
of the Real World.
If you regularly use one or more 802.1x protected networks, could you take
a moment to reply off-list, and tell me the size of
* Tore Anderson
I would pay very close attention to MAP/4RD.
FYI, Mark Townsley had a great presentation about MAP at RIPE65 today,
it's 35 minutes you won't regret spending:
https://ripe65.ripe.net/archives/video/5
Hi,
I´d suggest you to ask the guys from Enterasys mailing list. Sorry,
couldn´t resist ;-)
Michael
P.S.: No, I don´t have 802.1x enabled on LAN for my users sitting in
their offices.
Peter Phaal peter.ph...@gmail.com wrote on 09/24/2012 10:39:26 AM:
When a switch/router decides to sample a packet it records the
ingress/egress interfaces and accumulates information about how it
decided to forward the packet by examining its FIB tables. Each packet
may take a different
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Joe Loiacono jloia...@csc.com wrote:
OK, Well I guess I was thinking sFlow was primarily a switch oriented
technology versus on a layer-3 peering router.
The sFlow technology is a good fit for any device that performs a
packet forwarding function (including
On Sep 23, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
PSAV is the company. I just installed about 20 Cisco WiFi radios at the
Doubletree (a Hilton prop) at Sea-Tac. These covered only the convention
space, conf rooms, ball rooms, whatnot. It would seem that the hotel is
running their own system
On 24 Sep 2012, at 17:57, Tore Anderson tore.ander...@redpill-linpro.com
wrote:
* Tore Anderson
I would pay very close attention to MAP/4RD.
FYI, Mark Townsley had a great presentation about MAP at RIPE65 today,
it's 35 minutes you won't regret spending:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:52:28AM -0700, Peter Phaal wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Joe Loiacono jloia...@csc.com wrote:
OK, Well I guess I was thinking sFlow was primarily a switch oriented
technology versus on a layer-3 peering router.
The sFlow technology is a good fit for
On 24 September 2012 21:11, Adrian Bool a...@logic.org.uk wrote:
On 24 Sep 2012, at 17:57, Tore Anderson tore.ander...@redpill-linpro.com
wrote:
* Tore Anderson
I would pay very close attention to MAP/4RD.
FYI, Mark Townsley had a great presentation about MAP at RIPE65 today,
it's 35
On 24 Sep 2012, at 22:42, Mike Jones m...@mikejones.in wrote:
While you could do something similar without the encapsulation this
would require that every router on your network support routing on
port numbers,
Well, not really. As the video pointed out, the system was designed to
leverage
Question about what other service/network providers are doing in
relation to allocation of addresses for websites.
With IPv6 starting to trickle its way in, what is considered the
industry best practise now for IP(v6) addresses bonded to websites. In
the past the standard practise was to have
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:52 PM, John Mitchell mi...@illuminati.org wrote:
Question about what other service/network providers are doing in relation to
allocation of addresses for websites.
With IPv6 starting to trickle its way in, what is considered the industry
best practise now for IP(v6)
Does the best practise switch to now using one IPv6 per site, or still
the same one IPv6 for multi-sites?
As I've been migrating my sites to IPv6, each site gets its own IP.
Works great. I did find that I needed to improve my tools so I could
track the individual IP addresses and assign the
William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
but I also can't imagine hosting more than 65,000 sites on a single
server.
Demon's homepages service was based on IPv4 virtual hosting and had IIRC a
/16 and two /18s allocated to it. It was a single web server with a few
reverse proxies that took most of
You can avoid the giant NAT box as long as you don't have to add a new customer
for whom you don't have an available IPv4 address.
At that point, you either have to implement the giant NAT box for your future
(and possibly an increasing percentage of your existing) customers, or, stop
adding
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:52 PM, John Mitchell mi...@illuminati.org wrote:
Does the best practise switch to now using one IPv6 per site, or still the
same one IPv6 for multi-sites?
Certainly it would be nice to have IPv6 address per vhost. In many
cases, this will be practical.
It also
Morning,
The way to allocate IPv6 addresses per website depends more on the
technologies already in use at the hosting site. An existing hoster will
move slowly to any alternative method.
I predict a bigger, faster change in the way medium sized sites do load
balancing. IPv6 allows hosters
22 matches
Mail list logo
