On 06/10/2012 03:20, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Those who know Fred and knew Jon personally might want to throw an oar in the
water on this blog posting from last month...
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=4591
not sure if it's appropriate to associate some of the prime movers of the
Internet with a
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:14:41AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 06/10/2012 03:20, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Those who know Fred and knew Jon personally might want to throw an oar in
the
water on this blog posting from last month...
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=4591
not sure if it's
This has been going on for days.
We couldn't get thru to news.google.com but most everything else
works. Once in a while it works.
Connection is through towerstream.com. Traceroute usually seems to go
through, sometimes dies somewhere out there past their network
(72.14...? maybe abovenet?), no
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
This has been going on for days.
We couldn't get thru to news.google.com but most everything else
works. Once in a while it works.
Connection is through towerstream.com. Traceroute usually seems to go
through, sometimes
It's occured to you that FQDNs contain some structured information,
no?
-b
On October 5, 2012 at 21:47 b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
5. Bits is bits.
I don't know how to say that more clearly.
Hi
As I said earlier, names' structure does not map to network or physical
location structure.
DNS is who; IP is where. Both are reasonably efficient now as separate
entities. Combining them will wreck one. You're choosing to wreck routing
(where), which to backbone people sounds frankly stark
Well, George, you can take a new idea and run with it a bit, or just
resist it right from the start.
We can map from host names to ip addresses to routing actions, right?
So clearly they're not unrelated or independent variables. There's a
smooth function from hostname-ipaddr-routing.
Take an
My money is on an epic troll. Four out of five network engineers surveyed
agree their individual IP headers are best served without condiments.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:06 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: IPv4 address
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, jim deleskie wrote:
Just ask yourself how many times you have seen a Godaddy IP/NOC person
post anything to NANOG or to any other technical forum?
-Hank
Yes that math would work, but if your device can't handle 1x Internet
routing and your running without some serious
On Oct 6, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote, in part:
We can map from host names to ip addresses to routing actions, right?
So clearly they're not unrelated or independent variables. There's a
smooth function from hostname-ipaddr-routing.
I would suggest that this is a
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:24:18AM -0500, Ben Bartsch wrote:
use this:
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bgp.html
Please tell me how I can configure my router to use that feed to
automatically reject any bogon advertisements I receive from other BGP
neigbhors.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bgp.html
Please tell me how I can configure my router to use that feed to
automatically reject any bogon advertisements I receive from other BGP
neigbhors.
you actually have to look at that web page
В 16:22 -0700 на 06.10.2012 (сб), Randy Bush написа:
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bgp.html
Please tell me how I can configure my router to use that feed to
automatically reject any bogon advertisements I receive from other BGP
neigbhors.
you actually have to look at that
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bgp.html
Please tell me how I can configure my router to use that feed to
automatically reject any bogon advertisements I receive from other BGP
neigbhors.
you actually have to look at that web page
If you're seeing the same page, the configs and
In article 20592.28334.622769.539...@world.std.com you write:
It's occured to you that FQDNs contain some structured information,
no?
Hey, I've got a great idea. Let's lose this silly phone number
portability nonsense and use phone numbers as routes.
I mean, anyone who moves and takes his cell
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 06:12:08PM -0400, Frank Kastenholz wrote:
On Oct 6, 2012, at 6:39 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:14:41AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 06/10/2012 03:20, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Those who know Fred and knew Jon personally might
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 6:14 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Hey, I've got a great idea. Let's lose this silly phone number
portability nonsense and use phone numbers as routes.
You do not want to go down the hell hole that is SS7.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
Where I work for a local telecommunications provider, we will not run any fiber
smaller than 24 strand, and these days that is a drop into a building.
When talking about single mode fiber, the cost per foot difference in 2, 8, or
even 24 strand is typically a matter of less than $1 per foot.
18 matches
Mail list logo
