2610:1c1::/32 not reachable from AS3320 (Deutsche Telekom)

2013-01-19 Thread Christian Kratzer
Hi, it seems Deutsche Telekom AS3320 are not accepting 2610:1c1::/32 altough they do accept 2610:1c0::/32. https://f-lga1.f.de.net.dtag.de/index.php?pageid=lgquery=ipv6+bgppara=2610%3A1c0%3A%3A%2F32server=194.25.0.218EXEC=Execute

Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6

2013-01-19 Thread William Herrin
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Constantine A. Murenin muren...@gmail.com wrote: The killer app of the internet is called p2p. P2p is not an app, it's a technique for implementing an app. There are few apps which require p2p and can't be trivially redesigned not to. If you'll pardon me saying

Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6

2013-01-19 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:26:53 +, Mike Jones said: Potentially another source of IPv4 addresses - every content network (/hosting provider/etc) that decides they don't want to give their customers IPv6 reachability is a future bankrupt ISP with a load of IPv4 to sell off :) The problem is

Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6

2013-01-19 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 1/18/13, David Swafford da...@davidswafford.com wrote: There is no suckerage to V6. Really, it's not that hard. While CGN is the reality, we need to keep focused on the ultimate goal -- a Correct. CGN may be part of a transition towards IPv6.Not all providers are necessarily going to

Re: Suggestions for the future on your web site: (was cookies, and before that Re: Dreamhost hijacking my prefix...)

2013-01-19 Thread Matt Palmer
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:55:59PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote: --- mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote: --- From: Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org [Cookies on stat.ripe.net] On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:36:25AM -0800, Shrdlu wrote: The cookie stays around for a YEAR (if I let it), and has the

Re: Suggestions for the future on your web site: (was cookies, and before that Re: Dreamhost hijacking my prefix...)

2013-01-19 Thread Matt Palmer
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:41:41AM +0100, . wrote: On 17 January 2013 23:38, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote: .. By the way, if anyone *does* know of a good and reliable way to prevent CSRF without the need for any cookies or persistent server-side session state, I'd love to know

Re: Suggestions for the future on your web site: (was cookies, and before that Re: Dreamhost hijacking my prefix...)

2013-01-19 Thread George Herbert
On Jan 18, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:41:41AM +0100, . wrote: On 17 January 2013 23:38, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote: .. By the way, if anyone *does* know of a good and reliable way to prevent CSRF without the need for

Re: Suggestions for the future on your web site: (was cookies, and before that Re: Dreamhost hijacking my prefix...)

2013-01-19 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 1/18/13, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote: Primarily abuse prevention. If I can get a few thousand people to do something resource-heavy (or otherwise abusive, such as send an e-mail somewhere) within a short period of time, I can conscript a whole army of unwitting accomplices into

RE: Intermittent incorrect DNS resolution?

2013-01-19 Thread Keith Medcalf
Just an FYI... Every version of Windows since Windows 2000 (sans Windows Me) has had the DNS Client service which maintained this caching function. This was by design due to the massive dependency on DNS resolution which Active Directory has had since its creation. It greatly reduced the