Look for H3C or HP A series they do gre in hardware (I saw 5820 do 4Gbps
without a problem )
Nitzan
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Julien Goodwin na...@studio442.com.auwrote:
Another (somewhat cheaper) Juniper option if you meet its limits is the
EX[34]200's which now do GRE in hardware:
On Jan 20, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
Just an FYI...
Every version of Windows since Windows 2000 (sans Windows Me) has had
the DNS Client service which maintained this caching function. This was
by design due to the massive dependency on DNS resolution
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:54:37PM -0800, George Herbert wrote:
On Jan 18, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:41:41AM +0100, . wrote:
On 17 January 2013 23:38, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
..
By the way, if anyone *does* know of
On Jan 20, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:54:37PM -0800, George Herbert wrote:
On Jan 18, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
Storing any state server-side is a really bad idea for scalability and
reliability.
?
Hello All,
My company is looking at updating our CALEA set up. Our network has
changed appreciably since our initial rollout and I am looking at utilizing
Cisco's Lawful Intercept. I'm wondering what people are using as Mediator
Devices, aka what the Cisco routers are sending the Lawful
IGMP packets are sent with TTL=1. Is the tunnel interface on the router
enabled for PIM?
Tom
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Brian Christopher Raaen
mailing-li...@brianraaen.com wrote:
Just a quick note. I do have multicast enabled on the server gre1
interface. A tshark capture shows the
I'd stay clear of the 34s
On Jan 18, 2013 11:56 PM, Julien Goodwin na...@studio442.com.au wrote:
Another (somewhat cheaper) Juniper option if you meet its limits is the
EX[34]200's which now do GRE in hardware:
Are you looking at a Mediation box because you are doing VOIP?
Other than Cisco I am familiar with DeepSweep.
I have heard of Verint, Utimaco, and Pine Digital. However, no 1st hand
knowledge or anything other than passing. :-)
Justin
--
Justin Wilson
We used Cisco for lawful intercept.. Their mibs are wanky and at the time only
the 7206 was support for the LI functionality. Food for thought.
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
Original message
From: Byron Hooper bhoo...@staff.gwi.net
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Byron Hooper bhoo...@staff.gwi.net wrote:
Hello All,
My company is looking at updating our CALEA set up. Our network has
changed appreciably since our initial rollout and I am looking at utilizing
Cisco's Lawful Intercept. I'm wondering what people are using
Another option is the IP traffic export option.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t4/feature/guide/gt_rawip.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:34 PM
To: Byron Hooper;
I don't see any mention of CALEA. A traffic dump won't satisfy a CALEA
warrant.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2013 10:31 PM
To: 'Warren Bailey' wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com, Byron Hooper
Our Trusted Third Party (TTP) asked us to IP Traffic Export. As others
commented in this forum, the LEAs is not looking for SPs to replace their
entire networks to create an ideal CALEA-compliant environment. It's my
understanding that LEA will take a Cisco IP Traffic Export flow.
Frank
I agree with the TTP taking the IP traffic. They simply re-package it
for the LEA.
It's up to the LEA to take the traffic flow or not. If it's a true CALEA
warrant, not a normal wire tap, the defense could argue they did not
follow protocol.
Justin
-Original
I have yet to see a lot of networks in TRUE compliance with CALEA
requirements. Most of the time, it's some intermediate box that is doing a
netflow-esque imports from routers that net/j/xyzflow normally. The only
issue I/we ever ran into was how to in fact process the LEA request for an
actual
On 1/20/13, Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
[snip]
want to play ball, they take what you give with a smile. I would be
curious to see what would happen if a lawful intercept request came
through and the service provider refused to process it. I have been a
The LEAs
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 06:33:33PM -0600, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 1/18/13, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
Primarily abuse prevention. If I can get a few thousand people to do
something resource-heavy (or otherwise abusive, such as send an e-mail
somewhere) within a short period of
On 13-01-21 01:19, Matt Palmer wrote:
Things that require me to worry (more) about scalability are out, as are
things that annoy a larger percentage of my userbase than cookies (at least
with cookies, I can say you're not accepting cookies, please turn them on,
whereas with randomly
18 matches
Mail list logo
