Hi all
Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
how many memory can run one ipv6 full bgp table?
how many peer for ipv6 in Router reflector you suggest?
Do you suggest to separate the ipv4 and ipv6 in router reflector?
Thank you for your info
On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
Right now there are about 15k routes.
how many memory can run one ipv6 full bgp table?
This depends on the platform.
how many peer for ipv6 in Router
Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
Right now there are about 15k routes.
8k when you filter based on IRR.
--
//fredan
The Last Mile Cache - http://tlmc.fredan.se
Not based of IRR =D
Foundry CER2K
12111 BGP
Number of Neighbors Configured: 7, UP: 5
Number of Routes Installed: 22866, Uses 1966476 bytes
Number of Routes Advertising to All Neighbors: 53961 (41844 entries),
Uses 2008512 bytes
Number of Attribute Entries Installed: 22746,
Hi,
On Feb 14, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
Here are various sources to discover the size of the IPv6 internet routing
table:
Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious option to look at, just curious about
alternatives. Cost effective would be nice, but stable under attack is
better.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious option to look at, just curious about
alternatives. Cost effective would be nice, but stable under attack is
DynDNS was pretty decent for us. We had a fair amount of load with
them and they handled it with no problem.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious
I'm extremely happy with Dyn, for both personal and work (Twitter.)
Their staff is fantastic and great to deal with.
-j
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.comwrote:
DynDNS was pretty decent for us. We had a fair amount of load with
them and they handled it
On 14 February 2013 11:58, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious option to look at, just curious about
alternatives. Cost effective would be nice, but stable under attack is
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.comwrote:
DynDNS was pretty decent for us. We had a fair amount of load with
them and they handled it with no problem.
+1
Great company
-Steve
Hi David - We use DynDNS at my company, and we're very happy with it. I've
also used DNSMadeEasy at previous companies and found them to be rock solid and
very affordable. I think about two years or so ago, they survived a full on
botnet DDoS attack with no service outage - which my
Agree with John, Dyn are awesome.
- Register your external IP with a Dyn account, and start controlling which
site categories or custom URL lists to allow/block.
- Get very good reports of which sites are popular
- Get reports of DNS requests for known bad sites
-Petter
-Original
Hello,
We are a 2nd level of escalation in a service provider, trying to put a $
value on the support we give to our NOC and other implementation teams,
when they email us about problems they face. But we are merely bits and
bytes engineers that cant quantify and justify the value of what we do
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
I recommend keeping your network as congruent between IPv4 and IPv6 as
possible, with dual-stack.
Why?
Regards, K.
--
~~~
Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au)
I have been a big fan of CommunityDNS cdns.net for many years. Their
infrastructure is very robust and the prices very reasonable too. If there
is anything that needs improvement, it would be their draconian reporting
tool. Otherwise, it is hard to beat them for no non-sense reasonably priced
DNS
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Kasper Adel karim.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We are a 2nd level of escalation in a service provider, trying to put a $
value on the support we give to our NOC and other implementation teams,
when they email us about problems they face. But we are merely bits
Hey,
So usually this is done by the business unit leaders. At ATT people used to
call it pushing the wastebasket. The idea is that each department runs as a
separate business and in order to evaluate the business you debit and credit
departments as if they were counterparties in a trade.
I used to think that these kind of situations take place when a manager was
never an engineer so he does not understand how things work but i was
surprised when i faced these from managers with an intense engineering
career so i gave up on trying to give conceptual excuses and want to just
give
Hi David,
I don't know what exactly 'managed DNS' is too, but Amazon
Route53http://aws.amazon.com/route53/is very reliable (but not cost
effective) AFAIK. Rackspace also have Free
Cloud-Based DNS Management http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/dns/, but I've
never used it. You can find more information
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:58 , Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
I recommend keeping your network as congruent between IPv4 and IPv6 as
possible, with dual-stack.
Why?
For one thing, doing otherwise violates the principle of least
I would think your $ value would be calculated by a few factors.
1. How much would it cost to train and hire NOC guys that do what you
do today vs. using outsourced support for those issues or going to a
higher level team.
2. How much longer would SLA affecting problems take to solve without
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious option to look at, just curious about
alternatives. Cost effective would be nice, but stable under attack is
On Feb 14, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Kasper Adel karim.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We are a 2nd level of escalation in a service provider, trying to put a $
value on the support we give to our NOC and other implementation teams,
when they email us about problems they face. But we are merely bits
There is no such thing as a generic business case that can be applied across
all companies in an industry. Every business is unique in its product
definition and organization structure, but each question is also unique and
therefore the analysis must be done every time.
The way to begin is to
Mark Andrews wrote:
Sadly, it is impossible to say FTTC not fiber optic broadband,
because it is broadband (at least with today's access speed)
with fiber optic.
And by that argument pots dialup is fiber optic because the packets
went over a fiber optic link to get to the CO.
Well, not
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Not tested under attack, but this DNS provider is worth a look since
it's the only one with both IPv6 and DNSSEC a colleague could find:
http://www.dnsunlimited.com/
Hm. Your colleague didn't look very far. All of the
GuysŠwe're done on this. Let it go, already.
-c
On 14-02-13 19:13 , Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
Sadly, it is impossible to say FTTC not fiber optic broadband,
because it is broadband (at least with today's access speed)
with fiber optic.
And
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 07:58:10AM +1100, Karl Auer wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
I recommend keeping your network as congruent between IPv4 and IPv6 as
possible, with dual-stack.
Why?
I asked a similar question a few years ago:
29 matches
Mail list logo
