Also if your upstream has Google Global Cache (or whatever it's
called), the results can be very different I suppose.
Does Google use different naming structure for IPv6 CDN? Maybe this
particular cache does not offer IPv6.
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;r3---sn-n2uxaxjvh-j5xe.c.youtube.com. IN A
;;
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:25 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
For that, you need the help of a real cost analyst. That's what
they're for; they help organizations figure out a solid idea what
something will really cost before they start spending money. If your
organization is large,
On 7 Mar 2013, at 02:50, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
I would pitch it as follows: We need to at least have IPv6 access to
troubleshoot/understand customers that have dual-stack technology.
That's a great point, but my guess is that the suits
Hi all,
Just a small update.
Off-list Andree and me have been working together with Kenneth from dreamhost
to try and figure out what exactly happened and which device or party orginated
these prefixes.
Unfortunately no hard conclusions can be drawn from the data available to us,
especially
Hi,
I have a prefix that isn't being accepted by Level3. Can someone from
Level3 could contact. Off list is fine.
-brian
I had the opportunity to look at this from a TWC fiber customer in Ohio, and
this did not seem to affect them.
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
Original message
From: Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com
Date: 03/07/2013 2:22 AM
On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:42 AM, Arturo Servin aser...@lacnic.net wrote:
Yes, but this is an argument to deploy the whole IPv6 thing, not
against a strategy to first deploy in-house and then to customers, isn't it?
In my experience, it is always best to try IPv6 in-house (at least a
Pretty much the same process that I have seen in many ISPs and
enterprises.
Regards.
as
On 07/03/2013 11:32, John Curran wrote:
On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:42 AM, Arturo Servin aser...@lacnic.net wrote:
Yes, but this is an argument to deploy the whole IPv6 thing, not
against a
Comcast's customers send money to Comcast in order to receive whatever they
want from other networks. With that money, Comcast should invest in
infrastructure so that it's network is not saturated anymore. Isn't this
how IPSs work ? :)
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Vinod K vinod...@hotmail.com
From: Eugeniu Patrascu [mailto:eu...@imacandi.net]
Comcast's customers send money to Comcast in order to receive whatever
they
want from other networks. With that money, Comcast should invest in
infrastructure so that it's network is not saturated anymore. Isn't this
how IPSs work ? :)
In
Its a bit more complicated than that, especially when you're a large
operator that all the content providers need to be able to reach and you
have a (largely) converged backbone system.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu eu...@imacandi.net wrote:
Comcast's customers send money to
My comment was more or less directed to the person that said losts of
people want to send traffic to comcast, but no one wants to send money. I
find it very dangerous and provocative, and somewhat on the same line with
others that believe in the sender party pays crap they're trying to force
onto
Jumping on the bandwagon. I have not had the chance to follow the entire thread
but have seen this behavior from ATT Uverse, Time Warner, and Verizon FIOS. I
believed initially this was a capacity issue with Google and Youtube. The
reason for this thought is fairly simple with no scientific
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Antonio Querubin t...@lavanauts.org wrote:
I don't think the business case is the issue. It is the timeline over
which the sense of urgency becomes important enough for most execs to take
seriously. That's still a
On Thursday, March 7, 2013, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Antonio Querubin t...@lavanauts.org
wrote:
I don't think the business case is the issue. It is the timeline over
which the sense of urgency becomes important
To any ATT sales folks listening, my account manager has not been very good at
following up on multiple requests to quote increases in my IP transit commits.
If any account manager directors or other tiers who these AMs might report to
could contact me, I'd love to give you their name so you
Eugen and NANOG I'm sorry. My earlier comment was from conversation my last
employer had about peering with Comcast where they told us they had balanced
ratios. You can see from Ren Provo that is no longer true. This is politics
as usual, playing the silly game. I am sorry to offend. I
Matthew, I am sorry to offend, but I don't think the Skype development agile
when u say IPv6 is not needed or important in 2013. Microsoft hs strong
thought leaders like VJ Gill and Najam Ahmad who bring v6 to Bing and GFS. You
should follow their example.
Regards
Vinod
Date: Wed, 6 Mar
18 matches
Mail list logo
