On 06/05/13 00:34 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I read:
http://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/tues.general.Papandreou.conservation.24.pdf
I would like to point out RFC 3069. On most cisco equipment this is
done using static routes and ip unnumbered.
So my question is basically: What
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
http://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/tues.general.Papandreou.conservation.24.pdf
So my question is basically: What am I missing?
Both the router and host have to support sending and accepting invalid
ARP requests.
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, William Herrin wrote:
Both the router and host have to support sending and accepting invalid
ARP requests. Since the Linux kernel already mishandles arp by default,
you're probably begging for unexpected behavior. Double down on that if
the customer controls the server
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, William Herrin wrote:
Both the router and host have to support sending and accepting invalid ARP
requests. Since the Linux kernel already mishandles arp by default, you're
probably begging for
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, William Herrin wrote:
Nothing. The problem is that the arp source IP doesn't fall within the
interface netmask at the receiver. Some receivers ignore that... after
all, why do they care what the source IP is? They only care about the
source MAC. Other receivers see a spoofed
Hello - I am looking for someone with the SBC/Yahoo email group that might be
able to assist me in tracking down a couple of issues. I have pretty much
exhausted most of the known publicly listed resources. Feel free to contact me
off list.
Thanks in advance.
-
Max Dixon
On 06/05/13 18:57 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, William Herrin wrote:
Nothing. The problem is that the arp source IP doesn't fall within the
interface netmask at the receiver. Some receivers ignore that... after
all, why do they care what the source IP is? They only care
Friendly reminder to those who are in the NANOG Meeting. DNS Track is today
from 4:45 to 6:15.
See you all there.
mehmet
On May 22, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Mehmet Akcin meh...@akcin.net wrote:
Hello everyone,
DNS Track will be on June 5, 2013 Wednesday 4:45pm-6:15pm in Crescent City
Ball
We are having issues on our MIS Fiber dropping for 10-15 seconds at a time
and getting reports for end users working remotely that residential u-verse
internet stops working at the same time they are disconnected from work.
Uverse residential service in South Orange County CA has been bad all day.
Can't even get emails with attachments out.
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Mikeal Clark mikeal.cl...@gmail.com
Date: 06/05/2013 12:44 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: NANOG [nanog@nanog.org]
Hi Mikael,
(Sorry if you are getting a duplicate copy of this.)
In our network we had a couple of problems with RFC3069. Not all the hardware
we currently use supports the RFC so we tried to come up with a solution that
worked and didn't have us opening a lot of ERs (I know I reference 1 ER in
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:06:49 -0400, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
... Since the Linux kernel already mishandles arp by
default, you're probably begging for unexpected behavior. Double down
on that if the customer controls the server image.
I won't argue against calling Linux wrong.
My personal favorite is the number of notices that we receive as DMCA takedown
notices, citing the specific laws.
Most of the notices come from people who are unable to comprehend that US Laws
don't apply outside of the US.
Sk.
-Original Message-
From: J [mailto:na...@namor.ca]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Ricky Beam jfb...@gmail.com wrote:
I won't argue against calling Linux wrong. However, the linux way of
dealing with ARP is well tuned for host and not router duty.
I love Linux and use it throughout my work but I can't tell you the
number of times its ARP
Hi Landon,
On 2013-06-04, at 19:44, Landon landonstew...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering how other Canadian Hosting Providers handle copyright and
trademark complaints about customers on their network.
This is perhaps not directly related to your question (it concerns the
application of
On 6/5/13, Sameer Khosla skho...@neutraldata.com wrote:
My personal favorite is the number of notices that we receive as DMCA
takedown notices, citing the specific laws.
I'm not sure US copyright laws even apply to us here in Canada?
What countries have no internet laws?
N.
Canada signed the WIPO Copyright Treaty in 1997:
http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ShowResults.jsp?lang=entreaty_id=16
I don't know enough about Canadian law to say whether you need to ratify
it or accession it before it becomes Canadian lawŠ
HTH,
On 6/5/13 7:40 PM, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com
On 6/5/13, Sameer Khosla skho...@neutraldata.com wrote:
My personal favorite is the number of notices that we receive as DMCA
takedown notices, citing the specific laws.
Heh... In an ideal world; you'd provide them an agent for
copyright takedown requests, that they must send canadian
On 2013-06-05 18:25, Ricky Beam wrote:
That said, I do use a stripped debian box as an inter-vlan router.
You
don't want to see the pages of tweaks it's taken to stop it being a
broadcast storm generator. (and no, arpd is stupid hack.) It's a
beautiful thing to run tcpdump ... broadcast and
On 6/5/13, rdrake rdr...@direcpath.com wrote:
On 2013-06-05 18:25, Ricky Beam wrote:
[snip]
(And I'm not too happy with the BS 32 interface limit for multicast
routing.)
Actually, I'd love to see the pages of tweaks. Seems like it would be
useful if I need to do this in the future :)
The
On 6/5/2013 4:40 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
On 6/5/13, Sameer Khosla skho...@neutraldata.com wrote:
My personal favorite is the number of notices that we receive as DMCA
takedown notices, citing the specific laws.
I'm not sure US copyright laws even apply to us here in Canada?
What countries have
21 matches
Mail list logo
