I got the RFO today and what happened was:
The Cogent NOC investigated and found that one of our customers
connected through a Verizon aggregated circuit to the router was being
DDOS attacked. This type of attack can send excessive traffic to a
customer’s interface either deliberately or
All NANOG Attendees are welcome!
/John
Begin forwarded message:
From: John Curran jcur...@arin.netmailto:jcur...@arin.net
Subject: ARIN PPC Agenda for NANOG 60 Tuesday AM session Now Available
Date: February 10, 2014 at 9:48:48 AM EST
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.orgmailto:nanog@nanog.org
NANOG
On 2014-02-08 05:38, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Has there been any test if modern operating systems honor this?
Well, they would be defective if they didn't. Also, you don't even need to
announce the prefix at all, even with L-bit cleared. You can make RAs with M
and O bit set that won't
USAIR has Canceled flights on Thursday now as well.
http://www.usairways.com/TravelCenter/Advisories.aspx
[image: Limelight Networks] http://www.limelight.com/ Bradley
Raymo - Senior
Network Planner
*p:* +1 602 850 5716 | *m: *+1 623 703 5300
[image: Show It. Tell It. Every. Way. Every.
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could share some experiences with providers
in the great white north.
We have a few providers now and not happy with them. Cheap flimsly
virtual servers that charge .50cents a gig for BW overages.. :/
Any feedback would be appreciated..
Cheers,
Carlos.
I've been quite happy with the servers I'm renting from OVH
(http://www.ovh.com/ca/en/) in their new Montreal data center, which is their
entry into the North American market; they've operated in Europe for quite a
long time.
- Pete
--- kam...@ak-labs.net wrote:
From: Carlos Kamtha
We run 7206 NPE-G1s on some GigE peering points. At about 800Mbps of
aggregate Internet traffic (inbound + outbound, as measured from Cacti)
the CPU sits around 70%.
Setup:
- inbound and outbound Internet-facing ACLs (50 lines and 25 lines
respectively, turbo ACL)
- Inbound Internet-facing
On 11 February 2014 12:01, Carlos Kamtha kam...@ak-labs.net wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could share some experiences with providers
in the great white north.
We have a few providers now and not happy with them. Cheap flimsly
virtual servers that charge .50cents a gig for BW
OVH is a bit more then a VPS, they lease dedicated servers with vSphere or
vCloud.
iWeb is an actual VPS provider, never tried their VPS but had decent
experience with a dedicated server from them for the usual vanity email
purpose you'd use a VPS for now. iWeb B/W is 0.10$/GB and instance run
Our G2 with BGP full-view and sampled netflow 1:100 doing 1,2Gbit with
about 88% load.
On 12.02.2014 1:03, Mark Walters wrote:
Side note - our G2s at that same 800Mbps traffic rate run at approx 60%
CPU.
Depends what you’re looking for, what you want to pay.
I host dedicated machines for a bunch of clients, who get a realio-trulio
machine (something like a DL360) with unlimited transfer and the OS of their
choice. If they want it, they even get maintenance and after-hours on-call
tech staff
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Anders Löwinger wrote:
Is there not an issue with this if the customer is connected directly to
the access device over L2? They will not communicate with each other
direcly, all traffic will be exchanged through the default gateway?
Yes, what's the problem with that?
Hey all,
As promised in my lightning talk just now, here is the Operators and the
IETF info:
Details:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2014/01/new-project-operators-and-the-ietf/
Survey: https://internetsociety2.wufoo.com/forms/operators-and-the-ietf/
Please consider taking the
I generally spec the NPE-G1 as up to 1Gbps if you're using the onboard
ports. This assumes ISP type loads with little upstream, lots of
downstream, and relatively large flows (mostly 1500 byte packets) on
ethernet. It sounds like this fits your usage case well. If one were to
throw in ATM or
On 2014-02-11 23:41, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Is there not an issue with this if the customer is connected directly to the
access device over L2? They will not communicate with each other direcly,
all traffic will be exchanged through the default gateway?
Yes, what's the problem with that?
In the scenario you're describing does each PC get its own /64 (or /56 or
/48) directly from the service provider? Or are they in the same netblock?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Anders Löwinger [mailto:and...@abundo.se]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 6:33 PM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Frank Bulk wrote:
In the scenario you're describing does each PC get its own /64 (or /56
or /48) directly from the service provider? Or are they in the same
netblock?
They would each get their own /128 via DHCPv6 IA_NA, and they would end up
having this /128 and a
17 matches
Mail list logo
