Subject: Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition Date: Mon, Mar
31, 2014 at 12:17:19AM -0400 Quoting Patrick W. Gilmore (patr...@ianai.net):
On Mar 30, 2014, at 16:40 , Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.org wrote:
Subject: Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
Hi Paul,
Thanks for reply, it works :). But I have another problem; source port is
altered by the virtual service. However, we need the source port to be the same
on the destination servers. Is there a way to ensure this?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bertain
On Mar 31, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Anil KARADAG akara...@netas.com.tr wrote:
However, we need the source port to be the same on the destination servers.
Out of curiosity, why?
---
Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net //
Hi Anil,
Take a look at
http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/ns-system-10-1-map/ns-nw-ipaddrssng-enabling-use-src-ip-mode-tsk.html
- use the client's port.
We prefer F5 LTM much better than Netscaler :)
Cheers,
Edy
On 3/31/2014 8:17 PM, Anil KARADAG wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for reply,
Hi,
Thanks for solution but I cannot use it, because backend servers must know
netscaler snip ip for clients. So I need fixed proxy port to communication with
backend servers.
-Original Message-
From: Pui Edylie [mailto:em...@edylie.net]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:23 PM
To: Anil
There shouldn't be any reason for this happening. Our network integration work
generally involves moving a customer ASN from behind 3549 to be behind 3356,
and once moved is generally permanent. In some cases, 3356 provides transit
for 3549 to get to some peers that have been consolidated
Pardon for the ignorance regarding this. If folks can point me to something
I may have missed as a participant for over 14 years, to powering this
Alzheimers.
I received several reports today regarding some scans for udp items from
shadowservers hosted out of H.E. Seems to claim to be checking
On Mar 31, 2014, at 10:51 PM, Joe jbfixu...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon for the ignorance regarding this. If folks can point me to something
I may have missed as a participant for over 14 years, to powering this
Alzheimers.
I received several reports today regarding some scans for udp items
On 3/31/2014 10:51 PM, Joe wrote:
I received several reports today regarding some scans for udp items from
shadowservers hosted out of H.E. Seems to claim to be checking for issues
regarding udp issues, amp issues, which I am all fine for, but my issue is
this. It trips several IDP/IPS traps
At the bottom of one of their pages it says this:
If you would like us to not scan your network, please let us know
and we will remove your networks from the scan.
Likewise, if you have anymore questions please feel free to send us
an email at: dnsscan [at] shadowserver [dot]
10 matches
Mail list logo