On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, jim deleskie wrote:
Those all sounds like legit business questions.
Yup. On the otherhand at the other end of the customer spectrum:
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/it-ti/ipv6/ipv6tb-eng.asp
-jim
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor
Well, I was just looking at my Bell Canada Fibe (IPTV/Internet) setup
last nite and the gear Bell provides doesn't do IPv6 at all (not even an
option). This gear is about 3 years old, so my hopes for them aren't
very good...
Thanks,
Erik
-Original Message-
From: NANOG
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at
My Apple TV appears to use IPv6, but since there's no UI for it (last
I checked) I had to disable SLAAC on that subnet to keep it from
trying to use my slow connection.
So in my book, some v6 support is actually worse
At .ca, we see a very low IPv6 adoption rate in .ca domains and slow
progression rate. See last ~3 years trends at www.cira.ca/radarv6
Just as an indicator, we have 316 .ca domains with IPv6 glue records :-(
***
Can the major Canadian ISP reply back with their plans/timelines/costs on IPv6
Videotron (AS5769) is offering 6RD (RFC5969) to all residential customers,
if their gear supports it. (DHCP option 212)
(But our MGMT still calls it beta for now.)
JF
Jean-François Dubé
Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP
Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux
Vidéotron
NANOG
6rd is in my opinion a band-aid solution, I don't see the point of offering
IPv6 if it requires IPv4. native IPv6 should be offered where possible.
We offer native IPv6 to all our DSL customers but only on an opt-in basis,
we're although unfortunately unable to offer IPv6 over Cable since we
There are obviously layer 8-9-10 issues to deal with as well before native
IPv6 can be deployed.
Being a IP NOC grunt, I keep my focus on layer 1-7.
JF
Jean-François Dubé
Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP
Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux
Vidéotron
NANOG nanog-boun...@nanog.org a écrit sur
So in my book, some v6 support is actually worse than none
That has been my experience. The eyeballs are not happy.
R's,
John
I think it depends on the environment. Many small to midsized colleges
use some type of NAC for their dorms. Some of the most popular ones
don't have support for IPv6. I know there are more, but here are a few:
NetReg (and it's commercial variants such as Infoblox Authenticated DHCP)
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
I notice an IETF meeting in Toronto one month hence.
If Canadian operators (and content providers) were interested in talking
about their common problems, it might be convenient to schedule some time
adjacent to that meeting.
Lee
On 6/20/14 10:12 AM, jean-francois.d...@videotron.com
On 6/19/14 11:13 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote:
On 6/19/14 4:30 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I was focusing on the end-user (Consumer) set because given enough
migration
The point is that you can offer IPv6 to a lot of people using various
instatntiations of 100.64.0.0/10 but using globally unique IPv6 addresses
providing them full true internet access without NAT.
Yes, 6rd is a stopgap, but 6rd stopgap is better than multi-natted IPv4 only.
Owen
On Jun 20,
Colleagues:
On behalf of the North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) and the
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN), I would like to take this
opportunity to draw your attention to the 2014 Postel Network Operator's
Scholarship.
The Postel Network Operator's Scholarship targets
I concur with Owen here.
6RD is a band-aid, but a pretty effective one to introduce IPv6 to the staff
and management in your organization. When you get to native deployment, your
engineering and ops staff no longer freak out when they see some IPv6 config.
They can even debug ISIS and the IPv6
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 20 21:13:58 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
BGP Update Report
Interval: 12-Jun-14 -to- 19-Jun-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS47331 170567 6.8% 66.2 -- TTNET TTNet A.S.,TR
2 - AS9829 106400 4.3%
17 matches
Mail list logo
