Re: MACsec SFP

2014-06-23 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2014-06-23 11:13 +0200), Pieter Hulshoff wrote: > feature and market information for such a device, and I would welcome some > feedback from interested people. Discussion about other types of smart SFPs > would also be welcome. Feel free to contact me directly using the contact > information b

RE: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World

2014-06-23 Thread Keith Medcalf
>The question at hand is.. Do countries/businesses have to affiliate or >utilize any of those services provided by ICANN other than the assignment >of an IP address?   No. >And can you get away with LAN/CAN/MAN stand-alone systems [instead of >utilizing DNS-via-ICANN]?? Yes. >Example: >Is it

Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World

2014-06-23 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, stovetop 202 wrote: What do you mean by if anyone can see it? The lines are now closed off from the public's view.. but the textbooks still teach you that you should be able to have access freely.  Is it the data on the hard line that you're worried people can see? It wo

Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World

2014-06-23 Thread Randy Bush
> Is it legal to cut off those DNS systems and loop in backwards? >  (instead of bidirectional).  **  I don't want my city/schools/other > systems hooked into the World Wide Web. // someone let me know when > you get a chance. please do so on your network. it will reduce the nut postings on the i

Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World

2014-06-23 Thread John Levine
In article <1403558512.59036.yahoomail...@web161403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> you write: >What do you mean by if anyone can see it? You can easily set up your own tree of DNS names and servers. The protocol is public, and the software is widely available for free. But if your DNS names and servers ar

Re: Canada and IPv6 (& DNSSEC)

2014-06-23 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
On Jun 20, 2014, at 6:24 AM, Jacques Latour wrote: > Just as an indicator, we have 316 .ca domains with IPv6 glue records :-( Part of the problem might be that two of the bigger registrars (Webnames and easyDNS) *still* can't handle input of IPv6 addresses in their management panels - you hav

Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World

2014-06-23 Thread stovetop 202
What do you mean by if anyone can see it? The lines are now closed off from the public's view.. but the textbooks still teach you that you should be able to have access freely.  Is it the data on the hard line that you're worried people can see? On Monday, June 23, 2014 4:05 PM, Michael O Hol

RE: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World

2014-06-23 Thread Michael O Holstein
Short answer, Yes .. provided you don't care if anyone can see it. Take a look at what NEW.NET tried with DNS back in the day. Cheers, Michael Holstein Cleveland State University From: NANOG on behalf of stovetop 202 Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 7:45 P

MACsec SFP

2014-06-23 Thread Pieter Hulshoff
All, Last year some people on this list expressed interest in smart SFP options, like e.g. MACsec. As a network consultant and systems architect with AimValley in the Netherlands, I'm currently in the process of gathering feature and market information for such a device, and I would welcome s

short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World

2014-06-23 Thread stovetop 202
Topic: ICANN Vs. The World. The question at hand is.. Do countries/businesses have to affiliate or utilize any of those services provided by ICANN other than the assignment of an IP address?  And can you get away with LAN/CAN/MAN stand-alone systems [instead of utilizing DNS-via-ICANN]?? Exampl

Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

2014-06-23 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: > The Comcast business SMC gateway speaks RIP to make the >routed /29 work.. in theory it could be put into bridge mode and you can do >>the RIP yourself but they don't support that configuration (you'd need the >>key to configure it succe