On Oct 11, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote:
For Router Loopback Address what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ?
In the BCOP, this is noted so that those who suboptimally address their p-t-p
links with /64s can be consistently suboptimal by doing the
Subject: Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback
Address Date: Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 05:41:43AM + Quoting Faisal Imtiaz
(fai...@snappytelecom.net):
A follow up question on this topic..
For Router Loopback Address what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ?
In the BCOP, this is noted so that those who suboptimally address their p-t-p
links with /64s can be consistently suboptimal by doing the same with their
loopbacks,
I am trying to understand what is sub-optimal about doing so...Waste of Ipv6
space ? or some other technical reason ?
(is a /64
On Oct 11, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote:
I am trying to understand what is sub-optimal about doing so...Waste of Ipv6
space ? or some other technical reason ?
It's wasteful of address space, but more importantly, it turns your router into
a sinkole.
(is a
On 10/10/14, Tore Anderson t...@fud.no wrote:
* Baldur Norddahl
Why do people assign addresses to point-to-point links at all? You can just
use a host /128 route to the loopback address of the peer. Saves you the
hassle of coming up with new addresses for every link.
Some people think the
On 10/11/2014 8:41 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
For Router Loopback Address what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ?
The number of IPs addresses used on them subnets on them loopbacks is as
far as I can foresee only one [for each loopback]. So a subnet of size one
address should do it.
And
Hi Anurag
Here is sample output from using the mtr command: the -z flag shows AS
Numbers however, I am not sure where they come from or are looked up.
mtr can be downloaded :
https://code.google.com/p/rudix/downloads/detail?name=mtr-0.82-0.pkg
mtr -4z google.com
x61 (0.0.0.0)
From my research, various authorities have recommended that a single /64 be
allocated to router loopbacks with /128s assigned on interfaces. This makes a
lot of sense to me as (which has been said) there is no other *need* in the
foreseeable future to have more than one IP on the loopback -
On Oct 11, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Tim Raphael raphael.timo...@gmail.com wrote:
From my research, various authorities have recommended that a single /64 be
allocated to router loopbacks with /128s assigned on interfaces.
Yes, this is what I advocate for loopbacks.
Can someone from Charter Communications engineering/support hit me up off
list please? Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Max
paging ATT peeps
Does anyone have ATT's AVPN BGP communities reference guide?
e.g. 13979:120 to set local_pref to 120 and so on.
Thanks in advance!
--Andrey
11 matches
Mail list logo
