Why not use RIPE Atlas?
https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/udm/
usually it is because you can not put your own code in it for the
measures you want to make.
randy
We've seen 3 or 4 recent presentations of some new measurement project
that requires deploying yet another set of dedicated probes. While I'm
generally supportive of measurement attempts, I'll ask the same question
that was asked then:
Why not use RIPE Atlas?
https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/udm/
I experienced a loss of Comcast IPv6 service at my home I think it was last
Monday... My pfSense reported loss of reachability to the IPv6 gateway, IPv4
still worked but I had a period of intermittent high latency... Does anyone
know if Comcast is monkeying around with their IPv6 network?
It's starting to become more typical.
I finally resolved an issue after two weeks of fighting with them.
A remote office could send traffic out, but couldn't receive traffic.
I ran tcpdumps on the firewall, and did everything to convince them it
wasn't my problem.
They still insisted on sending
I had a similar thing with Shentel.
When I finally started sending them screenshots of Wireshark ARP traffic I got
to talk to someone that knew something. Turned out another customer was
advertising they owned part of my IP addresses.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: NANOG
I hate to use NANOG for this, but support has now ended a chat with me twice
without fixing anything, they just kicked me off.
I'm not getting an IPv6 address on the Comcast provided cable modem/router.
I'm not getting a PD. My machines thus have no IPv6. I've hard reset my
router 4 times
On 01/22/2015 06:28 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
It's starting to become more typical.
I finally resolved an issue after two weeks of fighting with them.
A remote office could send traffic out, but couldn't receive traffic.
.
http://xkcd.com/806/
Cute.
Maybe Comcast train the level 1
--- aa...@heyaaron.com wrote:
From: Aaron C. de Bruyn aa...@heyaaron.com
http://xkcd.com/806/
Maybe Comcast train the level 1 techs that if
someone says NANOG you get transferred to
someone who knows routing... ;)
Then, like the last cell in the
Gents,
We need to separate the context of fast reroute via control plane topology
map vs local link protection with OAM at mac/phy sub-layer and time frames
at which they are relevant.
There are efforts going on at the media level but then there are current
solutions that are media and
I’m wondering if someone has any contacts at Netgear they would be willing to
forward some information to. While working with their devices one of my
colleagues discovered some poor behavior of their embedded DNSMASQ, such as
returning REFUSED to DNS queries.
eg:
$ dig +tcp puck.nether.net.
Jared,
Netgear is divided into a few divisions and they don't overlap, is this
direct to consumer gear or gear they sold through an ISP?
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
Direct consumer, eg:
http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-Wireless-Router-N300-WNR2000/dp/B001AZP8EW
- Jared
On Jan 22, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com wrote:
Jared,
Netgear is divided into a few divisions and they don't overlap, is this
direct to consumer gear or gear they
Sorry, the guys I know are on the ISP side :(
I'll ask if there is anyone they can point us to on the direct side.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Thu, Jan 22,
13 matches
Mail list logo
