Looks like there were at least a couple of others that saw issues also.
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29852647-Connectivity-Comcast-down-Quincy-MA
Robert
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:52:29 -0500
Andrey Khomyakov khomyakov.and...@gmail.com wrote:
My boss has comcast at home in Milton, MA, said
Hi folks,
There was a problem with some prefixes New England rerouting properly
during a topology change.
We feel that problem has been corrected and would like to know if there
were other problems seen overnight (after UTC) in that region.
If you send to me, please include specific time and
I saw a problem only with my 50.176.16.0/21 subnet IP. My
24.147.20.0/21 subnet IP was working fine throughout.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 01:44:53PM -0500, Robert Webb wrote:
Looks like there were at least a couple of others that saw issues also.
I've had a similar mistake happen with TWC. It's most likely a glitch in
their config system which should use the gateway's mac address in order to
assign a static IP on the docsis modem. Tech support should figure this out
pretty quick without escalating it much further. I've had an instance
Since, we reduced ourselves to the level of troubleshooting consumer home
access on a cable network. I can let you know that this happens to me at
home, in silicon valley area of California routinely several times a week.
In fact, so much that I have ATT, Comcast and Verizon hot spot for the
rare
It wasn't intended to start troubleshooting end user's internet. It was
more to know what is up when my customer hold queue goes up to a couple of
thousand calls on hold and my monitoring system lights up like a christmas
tree.
--Andrey
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Bob Evans
Faisal,
You don't need to worry about power range when connecting SR or LR.
However, an ER or ZR on a loopback can damage Rx. The strength of the
receiving signal is always under the tolerance allowed. The 850nm Light is
attenuated very quickly because of the MMF and the 850nm light source. This
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
Hello,
I was looking for feedback on the following question:-
When connecting two MM SFP/SFP+/XFP 's together...(short range).
What should be the best practice receive power range ?
Is it true that if the rx power is higher than (x?) then it shortens the
life
Hello,
I was looking for feedback on the following question:-
When connecting two MM SFP/SFP+/XFP 's together...(short range).
What should be the best practice receive power range ?
Is it true that if the rx power is higher than (x?) then it shortens the life
of the optics ?
(assumption
Thank you guys (Bob, Brandon Eric) for the prompt answer.
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
- Original Message -
From: Bob Evans
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
I was looking for feedback on the following question:-
When connecting two MM SFP/SFP+/XFP 's together...(short range).
What should be the best practice receive power range ?
SX (1G) / SR (10G) / SR10 (100G) gear generally has a receive threshold
Thanks Justin...
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
- Original Message -
From: Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Usually on Multi-mode and Low-power single-mode optics the
MaxOutputOpticalPower is less than or equal to the MaxInputOpticalPower, so
it's not necessary to attenuate. The trade-off is optimized optics versus
having an attenuator sticking out the front of the electronics.
Something along the
*Call for Presentations*
CHI-NOG 05
(Chicago Network Operators Group)
May 14th 2015, Chicago, IL
The Chicago Network Operators Group (CHI-NOG) is a vendor neutral
organization of the networking industry. Our goal is to create a regional
community of network professionals by presenting the
Has anyone else having issues with Level3 routing traffic to the Godaddy ASN?
Since about 1PM Eastern today we have had numerous customers claiming their
internet was down, when it has only been a few websites they couldn't reach.
It's been up and down on My FiOS link some today as well. But
Hi,
Price and functionality-wise Planet MGSW-28240F and GSD-1020S look
pretty close to what I'm looking for. Anyone have real experience
with using them on a large scale? Performance?
Thank you for the pointer to MGSW-28240F. I am also curious to hear some
feedback as the gear is awfully
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ymbk-idr-rs-bfd/
Folks:
Since a lot of NSPs are also in the VoIP business, I was wondering if
anyone has specific recommendations for low-density (2-8 ports) FXS/FXO
hardware that they are using with Cisco PBX devices. (And I guess T1/E1
as well.)
I know that typical IOS boxes can take
You may want to ask on the cisco-voip list as it’s most centrally focused on
that.
Do you mean with CM or CME (as suggested in your subject line?)
We have generally been abandoning the Cisco devices as they haven’t released an
‘open’ phone in many years outside of what you mentioned,
On 2/11/15 2:24 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
You may want to ask on the cisco-voip list as it’s most centrally
focused on that.
Thanks, will ask on the list.
Do you mean with CM or CME (as suggested in your subject line?)
In this case, it's CME that I'm asking about.
I’m similarly looking for a
hey,
I understand it is now being replaced by the ASR920, which is a little
odd if you look at port density differences between the two alone.
It is being replaced by ASR-920-24SZ-M - 24GE Fiber and 4-10GE: Modular
PSU. I don't think this ASR920 has been announced yet :)
--
tarko
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-920-series-aggregation-services-router/datasheet-c78-733397.html
Aled
On 11 February 2015 at 12:49, Tarko Tikan ta...@lanparty.ee wrote:
hey,
I understand it is now being replaced by the ASR920, which is a little
odd if you look
22 matches
Mail list logo
