Thank you all for your responses.
This was exactly the kind of information and opinions I was hoping to find-
way better than reading tea leaves!
AFAIK theres no longer any way to get their attention unless you're a
customer AND have signed up for their online portal system at
https://my.level3.com/ - and I wouldn't expect anything stellar
then either. You'll likely have to do your own troubleshooting through them
as my recent experiences
Hi,
Any Level3 NOC contacts on the list? Our link in Irvine has been on and
off for few minutes already. Would appreciate replies offline..
Thanks!
-nathan
As someone rightly pointed out ARIN now down to 0.00978 /8s in aggregate.
or this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y36fG2Oba0
so this is more appropriate I suppose we'd better give it a try
On Fri Jun 26, 2015 at 09:26:53AM -0500, Doug McIntyre wrote:
I guess VZ thought the colo was ultimately to stand alone without
talking to anybody. And they are a communications company.
And there-in lies the answer to your question. They're a communications
company. They want to sell you
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:04:09PM -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:46 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my
astonishment, I discovered that there appears to be a Verizon
datacenter near my
I hear the Supreme Court just ruled IPv6 legal in all states...
What does this mean for the backward people who have been steadily
resisting deploying the current version of the Internet Protocol?
Drive Slow,
Paul
There was signing of NDAs
Which you obviously read and follow to the letter ;)
alan
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Doug McIntyre mer...@geeks.org wrote:
Then it was announced ready to move in, and we asked the procedure to
get cross-connects from outside the facility in (really the whole
point of even getting colo there).
Oh no, you can't have a cross-connect.
Umm, the
Nice try Bell.. So-Net did it two years ago, 2Gbps FTTH in Japan.
Article: http://bgr.com/2013/06/13/so-net-nuro-2gbps-fiber-service/
If you read Japanese: http://www.nuro.jp/hikari/
Eric
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Hank Disuko
Sent:
But what about us in Northwestern Ontario who can only get dialup, if that,
from Bell?
On Jun 26, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Eric Dugas edu...@zerofail.com wrote:
Nice try Bell.. So-Net did it two years ago, 2Gbps FTTH in Japan.
Article: http://bgr.com/2013/06/13/so-net-nuro-2gbps-fiber-service/
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your average
transfer rate, at least I don't
On Jun 22, 2015 6:14 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Two-way satellite systems based on SV's in geostationary orbit (like
the two you're considering) have high latency. 22,000 miles out,
another 22,000 miles back and do it again for the return packet.
Just a minor nitpick - that's
The portal should have some stats where you can do basic troubleshooting.
It's really easy to get registered on the portal, you just need account
number and customer name (which is scary, but go figure...).
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Michael Loftis mlof...@wgops.com wrote:
AFAIK
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
If you want to nitpick. ;)
Well, if you are going to nitpick, the earth is modeled more
closely (but still not precisely) as an oblate spheroid than a
true sphere.
They needed to do this. Rogers is already offering higher speeds.
At 02:04 PM 26/06/2015, Hank Disuko wrote:
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide
the good people of Toronto with the World's Fastest Internet.
Its mostly marketing, a number of years ago I worked for a cable co, we
knew if we increased BW X we'd see a Y speed increase in usage. We also
has done the math on several future generations of upgrades, so we'd know
if phone company increases to A we'd move to B. I know the guy that did
the
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:19 PM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 22, 2015 6:14 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Two-way satellite systems based on SV's in geostationary orbit (like
the two you're considering) have high latency. 22,000 miles out,
another 22,000 miles back
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your average
transfer rate, at least I don't think it would for me. Anyone care to
comment?
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide the good people of Toronto with
the World's Fastest Internet™.
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/06/25/bell-canada-to-give-toronto-worlds-fastest-internet.html
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:30:05PM -0400, A MEKKAOUI wrote:
Your right. Actually, Bell knows that home does not need that much
BW, Bell size their network for much less than that. However, from a
marketing perspective, when Bell says to a client I am offering you
1G at $100 and competition are
Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why
would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is no
residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much less 10,000
megabit.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
On 26/Jun/15 23:11, mikea wrote:
Define need. On the average, I probably don't need more than 56 KBaud,
integrated over all the years I've been linked to the 'Net from home. Would I
be willing to put up with it? Hell, no! Would I be willing to put up with 10
Gig to the house for what I'm
On Jun 26, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote:
Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why
would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is no
residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much
Parkinson's law of sorts? Use expanding to fill the bandwidth available
One kid with a torrent downloading random stuff, streaming hd and music off the
internet etc and a family of four can make decent inroads into gigabit or so I
would have thought
Don't even start counting say a gb here and
On 06/26/2015 12:03 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Personally I think it's pure marketing ... something I think we all
know...
I seen a few years back a FTTH development get completed using GPON -
everything in the area got Full Gig Internet. Speedtest while I
was onsite showed about 900Mb/s download
Your right. Actually, Bell knows that home does not need that much BW, Bell
size their network for much less than that. However, from a marketing
perspective, when Bell says to a client I am offering you 1G at $100 and
competition are offering you 30M at $60, some clients likes that because
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:06:26PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 26, 2015, at 13:02 , Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill.
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use?
we once asked how a home user would use 56kb, how anyone needed more
than 640k in a pee cee, how we would need more than 32 bits in an
address.
the only thing not rising is water levels. except the ocean, that is.
randy
We recently had to pull some year over year statistics on consumption
for a regulatory filing.
In 2009, our average customer used 11G of data. This year it is
85G. In 5 years it could be 400G or more.
What's worse is, OTT video means that consumption is more than likely
going to be at
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:01:38PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why
would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is
no residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much less
10,000
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Robert Seastrom
r...@rs.hmail.seastrom.com wrote:
On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:34 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
I'm told second hand that when MCI/worldcom (now Verizon Business)
controlled 8100 Boone Blvd (the early MAE-East) you had to buy a data
circuit
Like Peter Lothberg's mother's home :)
--srs
On 27-Jun-2015, at 12:22 am, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
And yes, fastest Internet in the world is pure BS, gigabit ethernet access
to peoples homes have been around for years in other places
On 26 June 2015 at 11:04, Hank Disuko gourmetci...@hotmail.com wrote:
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide the good people of Toronto
with the World's Fastest Internet™.
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/06/25/bell-canada-to-give-toronto-worlds-fastest-internet.html
Only
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your average
transfer rate, at least I don't
Personally I think it's pure marketing ... something I think we all know...
I seen a few years back a FTTH development get completed using GPON -
everything in the area got Full Gig Internet. Speedtest while I was onsite
showed about 900Mb/s download so pretty darn close (before they fully
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill.
This sentiment keeps popping up. It's a failure of vision. To suggest
that single people or ordinary people or any other set of presumably
On Jun 26, 2015, at 13:02 , Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill.
This sentiment keeps popping up. It's a failure of vision. To suggest
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, jim deleskie wrote:
Its mostly marketing, a number of years ago I worked for a cable co, we
knew if we increased BW X we'd see a Y speed increase in usage. We also
has done the math on several future generations of upgrades, so we'd
know if phone company increases to A
On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:40 AM, TR Shaw ts...@oitc.com wrote:
But what about us in Northwestern Ontario who can only get dialup, if that,
from Bell?
Seriously - write to your MP and MLA.
Landon Stewart
landonstew...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using
That comment was made from a customer perspective (myself) while I wonder
if I ever would wanna pay for it, although it seems like it's pretty cheap
already. As an entrepreneur, business, etc... then yes, I agree. Shoot for
the stars and land on the moon. :)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Karl
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com
wrote:
.
P.S. If there was any way to get a tour inside of there at least I'd
totally sign a NDA for that. :) Never been inside, let alone near, a
CO before.
http://museumofcommunications.org/?page_id=12
--
Joe Hamelin,
On 6/26/2015 19:44, Joe Hamelin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com
wrote:
.
P.S. If there was any way to get a tour inside of there at least I'd
totally sign a NDA for that. :) Never been inside, let alone near, a
CO before.
On 6/26/2015 20:31, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 6/26/2015 19:44, Joe Hamelin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com
wrote:
.
P.S. If there was any way to get a tour inside of there at least I'd
totally sign a NDA for that. :) Never been inside, let alone
The issue here is economics. 1G hardware is cheap, as in sub-$100 for
a 1G CPE with SMF in one side and RJ45 out the other.
Even if you decide to limit yourself at 100m or similar, if you build it at the
optics side, it is more expensive than building at 1G.
Because of this, 1G is the most
Good points. But just like I won't take more than one shower at a time, I
probably won't watch more than one Netflix stream session at a time
(assuming that for myself only). Downloading a large ISO image in seconds
is definitely a plus, although at the office I never reach a steady 120MB/s
from
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my
astonishment, I discovered that there appears to be a
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm a techie that recently moved to South
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:36 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach
In message cajb2g-h2cccqud7_bhpoydo+beysyzpy+js2p+hj6ruk0qx...@mail.gmail.com
, Rafael Possamai writes:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 26 21:17:55 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
BGP Update Report
Interval: 18-Jun-15 -to- 25-Jun-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9829 295162 5.8% 293.4 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone,IN
2 - AS11139
On 26/Jun/15 23:56, Mark Andrews wrote:
Unfortunately ISP's have made it about link speed rather than what
it really is about because link speed was the limiting factor.
When 1Gbps becomes mainstream to the home, I think it will stop being
about link speed (well, for a while anyway, because
It’s not just about the transfer rate, though.
As has been noted, response times at peak congestion are definitely faster if
you have more bandwidth.
So if you’ve got 3 kids all wanting to stream different HD5k content, 50Mbits
is going to get interesting.
100Mbps will probably handle it with
10Gbps inside the home at an economical price for the phys means IP Multicast
can finally be a viable alternative (replacement for) HDMI.
No more will you connect one Blu-Ray player to One Amp to One TV. You’ll just
connect them all to ethernet.
Amps and TVs will have UIs which allow you to
On 26 Jun 2015, at 15:04, Hank Disuko wrote:
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide the good people of
Toronto with the World's Fastest Internet™.
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/06/25/bell-canada-to-give-toronto-worlds-fastest-internet.html
Bell Canada is in the
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:32 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach johnmusba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Paul Stewart wrote:
The interesting part was that the development consisted of 4400 active
users the last time I heard but the bandwidth to upstream provider was
still only a single GigE and was not hitting serious saturation levels
most of the time.
I'd say for any
And that's the ballgame.
http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/3b5p3i/arin_just_subdivided_their_last_1718192021_and_22/
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
27. Jun 2015 03:06 by j...@baylink.com:
And that's the ballgame.
http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/3b5p3i/arin_just_subdivided_their_last_1718192021_and_22
And here's to another eternity of shitty ISPs not implementing IPv6 because
'they have enough v4 already'.
On 15-06-26 09:47 PM, tqr2813d376cjozqa...@tutanota.com wrote:
27. Jun 2015 03:06 by j...@baylink.com:
And that's the ballgame.
http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/3b5p3i/arin_just_subdivided_their_last_1718192021_and_22
And here's to another eternity of shitty ISPs not implementing IPv6
On 6/26/2015 7:26 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 26 Jun 2015, at 15:04, Hank Disuko wrote:
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide the good people of
Toronto with the World's Fastest Internet™.
On 6/23/15, 9:01 AM, NANOG on behalf of Ca By nanog-boun...@nanog.org
on behalf of cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Since you have failed to achieve in the modest task that was your charge
You now get this
https://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1471
Time to watch this again:
On Jun 26, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote:
On 6/23/15, 9:01 AM, NANOG on behalf of Ca By nanog-boun...@nanog.org
on behalf of cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Since you have failed to achieve in the modest task that was your charge
You now get this
65 matches
Mail list logo
