As DE-CIX learned, NYC is a very difficult market to get connectivity
and to build an exchange in. As such their operating costs are a lot
higher than in other markets
circuits in the states are more painful than northern europe, japan,
etc. a bunch of smaller isps in the states were annoyed
-- Forwarded message --
From: BSDCon Brasil 2015 bsdcon bsdcon.com.br
Date: 2015-07-16 13:09 GMT-03:00
Subject: BSDCon Brasil 2015: Apresentações / Talks
To:
https://twitter.com/bsdcon_br/status/620727031630798852
= pt
Acompanhe as atualizações da conferência através do
What are the main difference between these two peering companies,
exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be
Dallas Texas where Equinix already has the only established peering
exchange with over 100 members, and DE-CIX just announced today that that
would also be
On 22/Jul/15 15:48, Colton Conor wrote:
Why would people pay more to connect to an exchange with less members? What
is the european exchange that is a non-profit and basically only covers the
cost of operating the exchange?
My knee-jerk response would be that the big EU exchange points are
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
blocking to mitigate risk is a better trade off gaining better
percentage legit traffic against a indventant minor valid good network
range.
There are bound to be an awful lot of babies in that bathwater you're
planning to throw out.
You're
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
What are the main difference between these two peering companies,
exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be
Dallas Texas where Equinix already has the only established peering
exchange
6 matches
Mail list logo
