Re: Sign-On Letter to the Court in the FCC's Net Neutrality Case

I signed on as well, but why didn’t the EFF at least publish the letter to the list? It was well written and laid out, even for politicians. Personally, I would have included some VoIP stuff that’s well known about, but "que sera, sera”. The main point being if you want people to sign up,

Re: Microsoft blocking mail

On 18 September 2015 at 04:48, Keith Medcalf wrote: > > > You mean to say that you have to enable blanket remote code execution > authority in order to submit a problem report to Microsoft? What a crock of > crap. Thus I will never recommend to anyone that they use

Re: VUDU thinks my network is out of the country

Just their regular support team you can call into. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield > On Sep 17, 2015, at 11:43 AM, James Downs wrote: > > >> On Sep 17, 2015, at 08:46, Brett A Mansfield >> wrote: >> >> I need a good contact at VUDU. I have several

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net For

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:42:49AM -0400, Dovid Bender wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a > trace should not look like? Anyone have IP's that I can trace from the US > or UK that will show > 1) jitter > 2) packet loss > 3) very far away

Re: high latency on West Coast?

Hmmm, I am seeing about 20ms from a VPS in Seattle, do you happen to have a trace of the path with this issue? /Charles On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Florin Andrei wrote: > I'm seeing 250 ms between California and Oregon. Not just AWS, but also > between, say, Comcast

high latency on West Coast?

I'm seeing 250 ms between California and Oregon. Not just AWS, but also between, say, Comcast and AWS. Latency from other locations, such as between N. Virginia and Oregon, is much lower, about 72 ms in my tests. Anyone else experiencing these issues along the west coast? -- Florin Andrei

Re: high latency on West Coast?

On 2015-09-18 13:20, Charles van Niman wrote: Hmmm, I am seeing about 20ms from a VPS in Seattle, do you happen to have a trace of the path with this issue? From my laptop in San Jose to an ELB in AWS / Oregon: 1.|-- 192.168.1.10.0%10 10.6 6.0 1.0 17.1 5.2

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Here is an IP tunneled over a 3G service in the UK: 37.26.225.245 -Bart On 18 Sep 2015, at 18:06, Tyler Applebaum wrote: I was just kidding anyway. This is a 10gig Voxel IP: 80.249.209.187 No loss or anything, but it is in the EU, ~ 155ms latency for me on US West

Re: high latency on West Coast?

32ms via at

Re: high latency on West Coast?

I've asked Runscope (a monitoring service we're using for a few things, with locations in AWS and Rackspace), and they've confirmed my findings - there's unusually high latency somewhere around the AWS facility in Oregon, started last night, but they say it's "getting better". -- Florin

Re: high latency on West Coast?

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:50:23 -0700 Florin Andrei wrote: > I'm seeing 250 ms between California and Oregon. Not just AWS, but also > between, say, Comcast and AWS. > > Latency from other locations, such as between N. Virginia and Oregon, is > much lower, about 72 ms in

Re: high latency on West Coast?

L3 fiber cut . -andrew Original message From: Florin Andrei Date: 09/18/2015 5:37 PM (GMT-05:00) To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: high latency on West Coast? I've asked Runscope (a monitoring service we're using for a few things, with locations

The Cidr Report

This report has been generated at Fri Sep 18 21:14:54 2015 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History

Re: Sign-On Letter to the Court in the FCC's Net Neutrality Case

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:41:52AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Me too. Be sure to actually read the Amicus brief - it's incredibly > well written and informative. I've signed on as well and strongly concur with Miles' recommendation. ---rsk

Re: high latency on West Coast?

I have a SmokePing machine sitting in AWS Oregon looking at a few of my sites. It shows a bunch of ugliness starting around midnight Central and smoothing out but still with higher latency continuing to some sites. The same site is showing ugliness in the last hour. -- Keith Stokes > On Sep

BGP Update Report

BGP Update Report Interval: 10-Sep-15 -to- 17-Sep-15 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS9829 180449 3.6% 124.7 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone,IN 2 - AS38197

Re: high latency on West Coast?

hi andrei On 09/18/15 at 11:50am, Florin Andrei wrote: > I'm seeing 250 ms between California and Oregon. Not just AWS, but also > between, say, Comcast and AWS. > > Latency from other locations, such as between N. Virginia and Oregon, is > much lower, about 72 ms in my tests. > > Anyone else

Call for Participation: IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)

Call for Participation IEEE ICNP 2015 http://icnp15.cs.ucr.edu/ San Francisco, CA, USA November 10-13, 2015 Early Registration Deadline: 25 September 2015

Re: Transit Options in the UK?

It seems some time if you want a good uplink you have to rent a L2 channel to another country for that ;) So that can be an option too. On 17.09.15 23:49, Gary T. Giesen wrote: > I have a customer who's trying to decide whether to renew their existing > transit contract or not for a POP they have

Re: Transit Options in the UK?

On 17 September 2015 at 21:49, Gary T. Giesen wrote: > I have a customer who's trying to decide whether to renew their existing > transit contract or not for a POP they have in the UK and wondering what's > good for transit options out there. > > Looking for: > > - Good

Re: Microsoft blocking mail

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Tei wrote: > On 18 September 2015 at 04:48, Keith Medcalf wrote: > > > > Being blocked is probably a good thing ... > > > CGI forms that do the validation in the serverside are not up to > modern expectations*. You want to do validation clientside.

Re: Transit Options in the UK?

Its Layer 3 network now includes the lowest latency route across the Atlantic. Our new cable system: http://www.hibernianetworks.com/corp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Hibernia_Express_Financial_FINAL.pdf. Roderick Beck Sales - Europe and the Americas Hibernia Networks This e-mail and any

Re: Transit Options in the UK?

Suggestion Hibernia Networks ? Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom - Original Message - > From: "Gary T. Giesen" > To: "nanog list" > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 4:49:53 PM > Subject: Transit Options in the UK? > I have a

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Hi, > my own experience is the misinterpretation of the above properties in > traceroute is pathological to the point of making it useless in the > hands of novices... correct. you should be looking at the output of other data transit systems such as iperf, bwctl etc - thats why such tools as

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Expanding on this a little further, you could use this tool + some virtual machines and static routes to simulate just about any conditions you wanted. -- Regards, Jake Mertel Ubiquity Hosting *Web: *https://www.ubiquityhosting.com *Phone (direct): *1-480-478-1510 *Mail:* 5350 East High

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Tracing from the out side wont show anything as the external IP will be good. I need something perhaps on a sat link. On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Chuck Church wrote: > Any hotel wi-fi around 7PM local time. > > Chuck > > > On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Dovid Bender

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

On 9/18/15 9:04 AM, Chuck Church wrote: > Any hotel wi-fi around 7PM local time. > > Chuck > > > On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Dovid Bender > > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a trace >

RE: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Anything on Integra's network. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Dovid Bender Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 8:43 AM To: NANOG Subject: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away Hi, I am working on a presentation and

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

There are also plenty of simulators to create what you want. This one looks pretty useful: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netem On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Neill > wrote: Use probably any coffee shop’s

IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Hi, I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a trace should not look like? Anyone have IP's that I can trace from the US or UK that will show 1) jitter 2) packet loss 3) very far away (perhaps an IP on a sat. link). Pref over 2000 ms TIA. Dovid

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Comcast? On 18 September 2015 at 16:42, Dovid Bender wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a > trace should not look like? Anyone have IP's that I can trace from the US > or UK that will show > 1) jitter > 2) packet loss > 3)

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Any specific IP? I don't want this to turn into an ISP bashing session.. On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Tyler Applebaum wrote: > Anything on Integra's network. > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Dovid Bender >

Re: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Use probably any coffee shop’s wireless network to anyone any you’ll get that most of the time. On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Dovid Bender > wrote: Hi, I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a trace should not look

RE: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

I was just kidding anyway. This is a 10gig Voxel IP: 80.249.209.187 No loss or anything, but it is in the EU, ~ 155ms latency for me on US West coast. From: Dovid Bender [mailto:do...@telecurve.com] Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 8:54 AM To: Tyler Applebaum Cc: NANOG

RE: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Any hotel wi-fi around 7PM local time. Chuck On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Dovid Bender > wrote: Hi, I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a trace should not look like? Anyone have IP's that I can trace from the