On 9/25/15 5:43 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
On 09/25/2015 04:20 PM, Ca By wrote:
RFO: Google unilaterally deployed a non-standard protocol to our
production
environment, driving up helpdesk calls x%
After action: block udp 80/443 until production ready and standard
ratified
use deployed.
These are all interesting viewpoints.
Personally, I was only surprised that Google didn't:
A) identify the issue during early rollout (starting Sept 9) when Google
has specifically talked up to the community their tooling for monitoring
QUIC changes
B) catch what seems like a pretty basic bug
I don't believe anyone is actually using the LOC RR, but maybe I'm wrong.
This seems like the best way to store this type of data. I could see CDNs
being able to leverage this along with edns-client-subnet to decrease page
load times significantly. How is this still an issue? I mean, we have
With a new block it took less than a week.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sep 25, 2015 11:36 AM, "Baldur Norddahl"
wrote:
> You will find that it takes years before every site out there updated their
>
I don't believe anyone is either. We looked at it as well and after
reviewing logs from our authoritative DNS server responsible for our
in-addr.arpa zones, we saw zero queries for LOC records.
Ray
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:43:13AM -0400, Clay Curtis wrote:
> I don't believe anyone is actually
You will find that it takes years before every site out there updated their
copy of whatever geo database they are using.
Regards
Baldur
> > And this may trigger a refresh on routers, as people old or refurbed
> > equipment find they need to change. The whole reason for the inertia
> > against going to IPv6 is "it ain't broke, so I not gonna 'fix' it."
>
> Yea, well, it would be nice if upgrading existing home routers
> remained
> > The question really at hand: what happens when you need to host a new=20=
>
> > pile of servers, need/can-justify a /24, and your hosting provider=20
> > quotes you $2560/month just for the IP space (at $10/IP)?
>
> You probably laugh and go to some other provider or BYOA from a broker.
On 25 September 2015 at 02:57, wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:39:54 -0700, Michael Thomas said:
>> That will be pretty interesting for anybody who's using aws as their
>> server infrastructure since aws is
>> still v6 useless last i heard.
>
> I wonder if a sudden
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:43:13 -0400, Clay Curtis said:
> I don't believe anyone is actually using the LOC RR, but maybe I'm wrong.
> This seems like the best way to store this type of data. I could see CDNs
> being able to leverage this along with edns-client-subnet to decrease page
> load times
On 25 Sep 2015, at 23:44, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Which is why Akamai (and any other *sane* CDN) make their decisions
based on network topology, not physical location
+1
---
Roland Dobbins
On 23/09/2015 10:34, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> What are people using for ear protection for datacenters these days?
Summarising, people seem to use a wide variety of kit:
Ear muffs:
- 3M Peltor Shotgunner Hearing Protector
- 3M Peltor Optime
Acoustic headsets:
- 3M Peltor
You're example is one specific case. I'm not advocating that it works in
every case, or that geo-location should be used in routing decisions
exclusively. I have dealt with cases in which a CDN responded to a client
request with a resource on another continent, thus having to cross an ocean
and
On 25 September 2015 at 17:52, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> With a new block it took less than a week.
>
> On Sep 25, 2015 11:36 AM, "Baldur Norddahl"
> wrote:
>
>> You will find that it takes years before every site out there updated
>> their
>>
It'd really help if some larger content providers would give LIR's some
tools to effectively manage GeoTargeting within IP allocations and the
subnets therein that they own.
In my experience it takes anywhere between 2 weeks and 6 month to get IP
blocks effectively Geo-targeted.
Google is one of
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:39:22 -0400, Clay Curtis said:
> exclusively. I have dealt with cases in which a CDN responded to a client
> request with a resource on another continent, thus having to cross an ocean
> and adding considerable latency, when there was a POP on that continent.
And what was
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For
Looks like Cisco's Talos just released a tool to scan your network for
indications of the SYNful Knock malware. Details @
http://talosintel.com/scanner/ .
--
Regards,
Jake Mertel
Ubiquity Hosting
*Web: *https://www.ubiquityhosting.com
*Phone (direct): *1-480-478-1510
*Mail:* 5350 East High
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 05:04 , Joe Greco wrote:
>
>>> The question really at hand: what happens when you need to host a new=20=
>>
>>> pile of servers, need/can-justify a /24, and your hosting provider=20
>>> quotes you $2560/month just for the IP space (at $10/IP)?
>>
>>
BGP Update Report
Interval: 17-Sep-15 -to- 24-Sep-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9829 174784 3.8% 121.8 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone,IN
2 - AS21669
a) yes, 56,000 students and any on Chrome failed. I immediately blocked
quic and told users to restart Chrome. Luckily the fallback to good ol' tcp
saved the day.
b) I had this issue a few months ago and it subsided quickly
Google reports it's an issue in this version of Chrome and the next
This report has been generated at Fri Sep 25 21:15:27 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
On Friday, September 25, 2015, Cody Grosskopf > wrote:
> a) yes, 56,000 students and any on Chrome failed. I immediately blocked
> quic and told users to restart Chrome. Luckily the fallback to good ol' tcp
> saved
This reminds me of something I ran into where I came to a similar
conclusion.
We had a customer who used google ad and docs products very heavily and all
of a sudden they started getting captchas on accessing any google property.
When we reached out to google we were told that they were
On 09/25/2015 04:20 PM, Ca By wrote:
RFO: Google unilaterally deployed a non-standard protocol to our production
environment, driving up helpdesk calls x%
After action: block udp 80/443 until production ready and standard ratified
use deployed.
Let me be gentle about this. Why were you
Does NANOG have a problem, or do I have a more local masquerader?
--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
It is a big pain to do so. We did a couple of times in the past and
always took us many months.
On 25.09.2015 at 03:48 Ian Clark wrote:
Is there anyone here who has successfully changed their GeoIP data for a
subset of their ARIN allocation?
How do service providers get all the GeoIP companies
> They could purchase sales records from online retailers. Hey guys,
> give us the IP address, city, state and zip code for each sale; we'll
> pay you a nickle each. Then correlate that with BGP announcements that
> show the range of impacted addresses.
After looking more into the geo ip topic,
We have been using Maxmind's open source data set [0] on RIPEstat [1]
now for quite a while and there have been quite many user complaints
about the correctness of the location or the recency of the data.
One reason can be that [0] is updated/released only once a month,
usually beginning of the
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 15:57 , Joe Greco wrote:
>
>> According to http://business.comcast.com/internet/business-internet/static-=
>> ip
>> Comcast charges $19.95 per month for one static IPv4 address.
>
> High dollar amounts for a single static IPv4 address are nothing new,
>
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1876 (EXPERIMENTAL)
There appears to be a way of associating a subnet in the IN-ADDR.ARPA
domain to a FQDN, which could then be queries for LOC data. For single
addresses, the domain owner could opt to include location data for their
domain. For subnets, the
On 25 Sep 2015, at 14:22, Fred Hollis wrote:
See big telco's announcing /12's and having these IPs spread all over
the country.
All over the *world*.
---
Roland Dobbins
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> I wonder if a sudden exodus of customers whose iOS app got axed
> because it can't contact an aws-hosted server from an IPv6-only
> network will be enough to get their attention
Maybe they'll just proxy via CloudFlare to AWS.
Tony.
33 matches
Mail list logo