Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

Sorry this is so late, I get NANOG in Digest Mode... > I would really appreciate help in a few areas (primarily with certain > provider contacts/intros) so we can execute our strategy (which I can't > reveal here for obvious reasons). If you email me off-list with a > name/email that you've

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

hi ya roland On 12/04/15 at 11:09am, Roland Dobbins wrote: > On 4 Dec 2015, at 9:34, alvin nanog wrote: > >all that tcpdump jibberish > > Is entirely unnecessary, as well as being completely impractical on a > network of any size. up to a point, probing around at the packet level is

Re: Staring Down the Armada Collective

I agree Protonmail took a stance and believe many others can learn from their experience. But let's not over simplify the problem. According to their blogs the attacks were over 100G and went on for hours at a time over several days.   Attacks can go on for days and months.  Protonmail

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Jeff Walter wrote: > That cake will haunt NANOG until the end of time. > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > >> On Tue Dec 1 14:39:14 2015, Andrew Kirch wrote: >> > Might I suggest cake pleas? >> >>

eBay contact that deals with IPv6

I'm looking for an eBay network engineer to contact me off-list that can dig into an IPv6 performance issue. I started monitoring ipv6.ebay.com a week or two ago and the site times out (10 second timer) regularly. The last seven days indicate it's been timing out about one-third of the time.

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the >> global v6 internet > > if A does not peer with B, > then for all A and B > they are evil partitioners? > > can we lower the rhetoric? > > randy > I

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

It is worth noting that HE indeed provides the full view, it's the other side that has an issue. (Since HE isn't really a tier 1, their transit relationships with Telia and other carriers "save" them) Cogent -> HE dies with unreachable on the first hop though, and that's an issue for Cogent

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

> No, it's not an issue of A not peering > with B, it's A selling "internet transit" > for a known subset of the internet > rather than the whole kit and kaboodle. right. then hurricane and cogent should both make clear that they do not provide ipv6 transit to the entire internet. randy

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

> Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the > global v6 internet if A does not peer with B, then for all A and B they are evil partitioners? can we lower the rhetoric? randy

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

Whoops, spoke too soon. While HE indeed seems to use the transits to reach Cogent, they only do this over v4. IPv6 packets are indeed dropped on the first border. Sorry for the noise. core1.fmt1.he.net> traceroute ipv6 2001:550:2:d::a:2 numericTarget 2001:550:2:d::a:2 Hop Start 1 Hop

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the >> global v6 internet > > if A does not peer with B, > then for all A and B > they are evil partitioners? > > can we lower the rhetoric? It's Cogent.

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On 5 December 2015 at 02:43, Randy Bush wrote: > > Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the > > global v6 internet > > if A does not peer with B, > then for all A and B > they are evil partitioners? > > can we lower the rhetoric? > They both loses on

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

Is "tier" even a thing anymore? On Dec 4, 2015 8:46 PM, "Paul S." wrote: > It is worth noting that HE indeed provides the full view, it's the other > side that has an issue. > > (Since HE isn't really a tier 1, their transit relationships with Telia > and other carriers

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, PaNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: Netflow parameters and data that comes from CDNs

Hi, > And in fictitious case of jf_music.com hiring Akamai, would the Akamai > server(s) have a dedicated IP for jf_music in each city (or re-use same > IP via anycast) or would the CDN servers use the same IP address to > deliver multiple services from totally different content providers ? >