Hi,
shouldn't the same logic of ownership of DNS domain names apply to inetnum
address space?
Best regards,
Jonas
Sent from my iPad
> On 02 Mar 2016, at 07:12, Karl Auer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 00:44 -0500, William Herrin wrote:
>> Do I have the legal right to exclude others from an
Hi, these sites sell PA network space, I assume? Where may I buy PI nets?
Best regards,
Jonas
Sent from my iPad
> On 02 Mar 2016, at 01:54, Jim Mercer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:32:44PM -0500, Paras Jha wrote:
>> Does anyone know of any IP space brokers other than Hilco Streambank?
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 00:44 -0500, William Herrin wrote:
> Do I have the legal right to exclude others from announcing my block
> of IP addresses to the public Internet routing tables? It's not well
> tested in court but the odds are exceptionally strong that I do.
If I own some property - say a f
On 2/Mar/16 08:04, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We were initially looking at at the Nexus 9000, but then moved to the
> 7700 because the Broadcom chip on the 7700 cannot do single flows larger
> than 40Gbps on the 100Gbps ports.
The Broadcom chip on the 9000, I meant...
Mark.
On 1/Mar/16 17:18, Peter Phaal wrote:
> It also appears that Cisco's merchant silicon based switches have a
> greater variety of orchestration capabilities, Python, NX-API,
> Ansible, etc.
We were initially looking at at the Nexus 9000, but then moved to the
7700 because the Broadcom chip on th
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Unique registrations in the RIR databases may well be property.
Hi Owen,
Registration records property. Registrations are not the property recorded.
The U.S. Supreme Court talks about property this way: "The right to
exclude others [is] one o
If anyone has connections at Amazon in those areas, could you pass them my way?
My IP peering contact (MMC) seems to have fallen off the face of the earth and
I'm not sure that's his jurisdiction anyway. Their web site seems largely
useless so far, catering more to the consultant and software de
I can confirm that AWS (and Equinix, by extension, from a facility operator
perspective) permit carriers to have multiple end users share a physical
interface into the AWS gateway. The key is whether the providers that are
permitted into the DX environment (I believe AWS has limited the list to
onl
I haven't heard it from the horse's mouth, but I heard that the only way to
have customers share an AWS DX (apparently) cross connect is through Equinix's
cloud exchange service. Can anyone confirm that? It doesn't seem right that I
could transport people to AWS all day long if they buy their ow
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:32:44PM -0500, Paras Jha wrote:
> Does anyone know of any IP space brokers other than Hilco Streambank? I'm
> looking to get a feel for the market a little bit.
register with the ARIN STLS, there are some blocks available there too.
--jim
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian R
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Paras Jha wrote:
Does anyone know of any IP space brokers other than Hilco Streambank? I'm
looking to get a feel for the market a little bit.
Addrex.net
--
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 08:57 , William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
>> It's my understanding that the IP adress space is nothing but numbers
>> and that RIR/LIRs are only responsible for the uniqueness of allocations
>> and assignements, that is, a tra
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 08:50 , Naslund, Steve wrote:
>
> Oh, and I forgot to add...the number in and of itself does not have a value.
> The right to use that number within the Internet connected network is what
> has value.
But that’s not what RIRs give you.
RIRs have no control over your r
Similar in name but more comprehensive in scope, OpenNMS may also be worth a
look. Disclosure: I work for the project's primary maintainer.
On March 1, 2016 5:50:07 PM EST, Alessandro Martins
wrote:
>Hey,
>
>LibreNMS is an opensource Observium's fork with some extra addons...
>
>Take a look: ht
Hey,
LibreNMS is an opensource Observium's fork with some extra addons...
Take a look: http://www.librenms.org
--
Alessandro Martins
On Feb 27, 2016 20:37, "Peter Loron" wrote:
> We’re using Observium for trend collecting, graphing, and alerting.
>
> -Pete
>
>
>
>
> On 2/27/16, 13:12, "NANOG
Does anyone know of any IP space brokers other than Hilco Streambank? I'm
looking to get a feel for the market a little bit.
Regards
Paras
--- jason_living...@comcast.com wrote:
As noted last week we're ...
Thank you for sharing this and all the other stuff over
the years with the NANOG community.
scott
Jay,
VPC is supported over IPsec if your public path is sufficient into the AWS
cloud.
AWS shortens DirectConnect to DX not DC for some reason.
The AWS DirectConnect service is built on 10G infrastructure so using
potentially larger interconnects over public peerings with IPsec could be
advantag
Not sure about AWS, but if you are a client of Dimension Data cloud, you
don't need to do anything. Everything will be taking care off from the
provider perspective. Didata will peer with your tier 1/MPLS - acts as
CPE...etc I am pretty sure AWS does that for you as well.
Else you could spin up a
As a followup to this issue, and looking specifically at SSDP abuse (not the
DNS amplification noted in the 1st email), one point of commonality we have
identified in many customers is a D-Link device (range of different models). If
you or someone you know uses a D-Link device, please see this p
If you're asking if one can get a provider's router to handle the outside
physical part of a DC connection... As an ISP service so you don't need your
own router hardware...
I was working on this for a recent ex client and asked Level 3 exactly that
question. I believe I had the right network
Just got this dropped on my desk an hour ago, and I'm not finding as much
material online as I might have hoped for...
It looks like the easiest solution is to just hang a router/firewall at
Equinix Ashburn and AWS-DC to that, and then peer it to carriers both IP and
MPLS; is there a "native" way
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 29/Feb/16 12:15, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>
>> Cisco Nexus switches support sflow, since they are broadcom based.
>
> Not all of them, just the Nexus 9000, IIRC.
>
The situation in the Cisco Nexus line is confusing. In addition, to
the Nexus
On 01/03/16 10:44, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly
> new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with
> switching backbone on Nexus switches.
You could go with withbox switches, which is based on same broadcom
ASIC, b
On 01/03/16 17:13, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 29/Feb/16 12:15, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>
>> Cisco Nexus switches support sflow, since they are broadcom based.
>
> Not all of them, just the Nexus 9000, IIRC.
>
Nexus 3000 also broadcom, but maybe not all models.
Brocade as well.
On Mar 1, 2016 8:39 AM, "David Bass" wrote:
> I don't agree with that statement (about rare to find big companies using
> Nexus). If you want 10 gig/40 gig (or 100 gig soon) your options are Cisco
> Nexus/Arista/Juniper QFX...some periphery devices as well, but the majority
> us
Yep, actually do not mean. I've never used Nexus and haven't any
experience with it :) I mentioned this in original message. I'm pretty
sure it's awesome switch. But as I haven't any experience I do not
known cons and pros about it.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 1/Mar
On 1/Mar/16 16:33, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> As opposed to older Cisco switches.
Well, every vendor has older switches.
> Btw, 100GE is pretty new and
> actually I have experience only with Extreme Black Diamond 8.
Does not mean the Nexus is a bad choice for high capacity core
switching. Just
I don't agree with that statement (about rare to find big companies using
Nexus). If you want 10 gig/40 gig (or 100 gig soon) your options are Cisco
Nexus/Arista/Juniper QFX...some periphery devices as well, but the majority use
one of those 3.
The merchant silicon based switches are pretty r
As opposed to older Cisco switches. Btw, 100GE is pretty new and
actually I have experience only with Extreme Black Diamond 8.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 1/Mar/16 09:44, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
>> But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly
>
On 1/Mar/16 09:44, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly
> new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with
> switching backbone on Nexus switches.
As opposed to?
We are looking at the Nexus 7700 for 100Gbps core switchi
On 29/Feb/16 12:15, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> Cisco Nexus switches support sflow, since they are broadcom based.
Not all of them, just the Nexus 9000, IIRC.
Mark.
Hi,
A couple of months ago, I asked you to share your experiences with regards to
public regulation of internet interconnection in a survey. Many networkers from
around the globe participated. Thank you!
The report has now been published. I’m including the executive summary below.
The full pap
33 matches
Mail list logo
