Re: junkmailers take the day off....?

I'm seeing the same thing. Weird. -mel via cell > On Mar 19, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Mike wrote: > > Hi, > >This is not a complaint, but today seems to be a major disturbance in the > force...my junkmail load seems to be WAAA down today, like they all are >

junkmailers take the day off....?

Hi, This is not a complaint, but today seems to be a major disturbance in the force...my junkmail load seems to be WAAA down today, like they all are out at the beach or something... some major botnet get shutdown or something??? Mike

10gig pricing with Verizon crazy?

Curious if anyone has had similar experience; looking for a 10gig transit circuit at a colo, contacted VZ as they’re on net in the facility, quoted me an astronomical amount at 10-20x going rates these days. I’m curious if I just happened across a bad rep and should dig further, or that’s par

Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:29:44 -, "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" said: > A single bit error will drop a whole packet. > Larger packets will cause more loss. Cables will need to be > shorter or bitrates lower to compensate. If that's an actual concern in your production network, you probably have bigger

So Cal Verizon Business FIOS to Frontier cutover

So the transition from Verizon to Frontier is coming up, and I recently got a notice from Verizon pointing me to the following website: http://meetfrontier.com/ Evidently one of the things Verizon did not sell to Frontier is their IP address space, as it seems customers with static IP addresses

Re: Craiglist blocked

My guy (who is coder team not ops) confirmed he got the forwarded email and is passing it to the right ops folks, but those ops folks will have to reach back out again to Chris. You might try Michael's contacts if you don't hear anything in a few hours at most. George William Herbert Sent

Re: 10gig pricing with Verizon crazy?

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 5:48 PM, David Hubbard > wrote: > > Curious if anyone has had similar experience; looking for a 10gig transit > circuit at a colo, contacted VZ as they’re on net in the facility, quoted me > an astronomical amount at 10-20x going rates

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

I think the RFQ idea isn’t a bad one, but I doubt it will have any effect. Cogent already knows that they have customers leaving because of their peering wars. They don’t seem to care. However, if it’s going to be effective, I think the RFQ has to be achievable by most other networks. I

Re: collectd as alternative to RTG for high-resolution polling and long term storage?

Collectd is great, IMHO. I was using collectd+graphite to gather and display stats for a large collection of VMs, servers, routers, and switches. Collectd itself was pretty low overhead, easy to configure (I managed configs via puppet) and Just Worked. Graphite and carbon cache were a little

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

On 16/Mar/16 22:17, Owen DeLong wrote: > Sure, that’s valid and I’m not criticizing your decision. Just saying that > according to you, Cogent outright lied to you in 2014 and you let them get > away with it. I probably should have been clearer in stating that between 2010 and 2014, Cogent's

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, PaNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: collectd as alternative to RTG for high-resolution polling and long term storage?

Prometheus is also worth taking a look at. http://prometheus.io/docs/introduction/comparison/ *[image: userimage]Scott Larson[image: los angeles]

Re: collectd as alternative to RTG for high-resolution polling and long term storage?

On Mar 16, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > > Would anyone care to share their experience using collectd as an > alternative to rtg for high-resolution polling of interface traffic and > long term storage? > > I am investigating the various options for large data

Re: collectd as alternative to RTG for high-resolution polling and long term storage?

Thus spake Eric Kuhnke (eric.kuh...@gmail.com) on Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:45:26AM -0700: > Would anyone care to share their experience using collectd as an > alternative to rtg for high-resolution polling of interface traffic and > long term storage? > > I am investigating the various options

Re: www.cisco.com no resolve?

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 05:38:03AM +, Dmitry Sherman wrote a message of 13 lines which said: > dig www.cisco.com @8.8.8.8 Better to test through the authoritative name servers. The problem was there, as documented in

Re: www.cisco.com no resolve?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:53:15PM -0700, John Kinsella wrote a message of 49 lines which said: > Confirmed in Northern California, on all 3 primary NS servers. A > little Friday night maintenance window, maybe? Isn't it simply because the alias chain is awfully long

transferring [legacy] address space from arin to ripe

i have just finished $subject. arin and ripe host and admin folk were cooperative and helpful to the point of being embarrassing; dealing with me when the moon is in klutz has to be a major pita. but inter-rir transfer works, works well, and works for legacy space. we are continuing by bringing

Re: 10gig pricing with Verizon crazy?

We were talking to AT once about using them for last-mile in their territories. The first pricing we got was astronomical. One we recovered from the shock and scrolled down, we saw all the 98%discount this, 95% discount that tables, which after being applied brought them into the ballpark. I seem

Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?

There was one draft few years ago https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mlevy-ixp-jumboframes-00#section-3.1 On 17/03/2016 20:49, Chris Woodfield wrote: > Have their been any efforts on the IETF side of things to standardize this, > at least for IPv4/v6 packets?

Re: collectd as alternative to RTG for high-resolution polling and long term storage?

Collectd supports a large number “write” plugins[1] that can write out to various sources. I had been eyeing Grafana and OpenTSDB, they’re probably worth a look John 1: https://collectd.org/wiki/index.php/Table_of_Plugins > On Mar 16, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Louis Kowolowski

Re: Craiglist blocked

> I know someone (not ops but ha can forward internally); forwarding to > him. If George's contact doesn't pan out, I have a name that I can forward your concern to. Ping me at work (address in the Cc:) with details if there's no response? > George William Herbert > Sent from my iPhone > >> On

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

On Mar 16, 2016 10:06 AM, "Christopher Morrow" wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Bohn wrote: > > So if someone (say an eyeball network) was putting out a RFQ for a gig say > > of upstream cxn and wanted to spec full reachability to the

Re: CALEA Requirements

Thanks for the tips. All good info. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Kraig Beahn wrote: > > I believe Scott, just hit the nail on the head... > "but keep in mind that it's normal for people who have > had to fulfill a request *to be disallowed from talking

Latency in ATT DSL from Houston.

Hello All, I am trying to get some assistance with latency I am seeing inside ATT. DSL Support has been next to useless, and I am already pursing different connectivity options, but getting this fixed would be awesome. The problem is two fold, I see latency to pretty much any destination,

Re: collectd as alternative to RTG for high-resolution polling and long term storage?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Would anyone care to share their experience using collectd as an > alternative to rtg for high-resolution polling of interface traffic and > long term storage? > > I am investigating the various options for large data

Re: 10gig pricing with Verizon crazy?

What's your state/region and the general ballpark of the price quoted? ᐧ On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:48 PM, David Hubbard < dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote: > Curious if anyone has had similar experience; looking for a 10gig transit > circuit at a colo, contacted VZ as they’re on net in the

Re: transferring [legacy] address space from arin to ripe

The interesting thing is how much trouble you will get from the geolocation circus. Or maybe you will get additional revenue from Netflix customers that love the American Netflix. Regards Baldur Den 17/03/2016 07.42 skrev "Randy Bush" : > i have just finished $subject. arin and

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 11:43 , Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 16/Mar/16 17:41, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> my guess is the same as Owen's ... 'your rfq don't mean squat'. >> honestly it's not like people don't ask their cogent sales folk for >> this sort of thing, it's

Craiglist blocked

Does anyone have a contact at Craigslist? Some of our IP addresses got blocked and we are getting no response from the email address listed when attempting to visit their site. Our customers are threatening mutiny. -- Christopher Tyler MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE Total Highspeed Internet

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Bohn wrote: > So if someone (say an eyeball network) was putting out a RFQ for a gig say > of upstream cxn and wanted to spec full reachability to the full V6 net, > what would the wording for that spec look like? Maybe require something

Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?

Put MTU in BGP announcements? Imagine how much fun we could have if you could make routing decisions based on available path MTU... Regards, Baldur

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 12:42 , Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 16/Mar/16 21:23, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> Please confirm that you in fact are receiving 174 * 6939 IPv6 paths from >> them? >> >> Seems unlikely to me. > > Nope (neither IPv4 nor IPv6) - they are about 1,500

Re: Craiglist blocked

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 2:51 PM, "Michael J Wise" wrote: > > Let's try that again, once more with feeling. Put that tablet away I'm asking you, please, no It isn't right, it isn't fair! There were firewalls everywhere I think that exploit wasn't there... George William

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Bohn wrote: > So if someone (say an eyeball network) was putting out a RFQ for a gig say > of upstream cxn and wanted to spec full reachability to the full V6 net, > what would the wording for that spec look like? > Would that get

Re: www.cisco.com no resolve?

Confirmed in Northern California, on all 3 primary NS servers. A little Friday night maintenance window, maybe? Looks like it’s just the www record... > On Mar 18, 2016, at 10:38 PM, Dmitry Sherman wrote: > > dig www.cisco.com @8.8.8.8 > > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>>