> I clearly need three of those maser things for my network.
Gives new meaning to the phrase "Set and forget". :)
-mel beckman
> On May 14, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
>
>> On 13 May 2016 at 23:01, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
On 13 May 2016 at 23:01, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> Ok how many hours or days of holdover can you expect from quartz,
> temperature compensated quartz or Rubidium? Should we calculate holdover as
> time until drift is more than 1 millisecond, 10 ms or more for NTP
>
For that distance link you could use to 300m 45 degree slant AF5x antenna
Regards,
Hal Ponton
Senior Network Engineer
Buzcom / FibreWiFi
> On 14 May 2016, at 18:43, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>
>> On May 14, 2016, at 6:07 AM, Matt Hoppes
> On May 14, 2016, at 6:07 AM, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> Jared - why not go to Ubiquiti AC gear if you need some more speed and
> something more modern?
Concern is with the UBNT AC 500mm dish and wind loading on the tower even with
radome.
b5 is ~450mm and
AF24HD can do full duplex 1Gbps
On May 14, 2016 12:17 PM, "Eric Rogers" wrote:
> If it is 3-4KM, I would definitely use the AF24 (24GHz) because it gives
> you 750M/750M Full duplex. For longer, or a backup link, I would use the
> AF5X (not AF5) instead of the B5.
If it is 3-4KM, I would definitely use the AF24 (24GHz) because it gives you
750M/750M Full duplex. For longer, or a backup link, I would use the AF5X (not
AF5) instead of the B5. That way you have 750M full duplex during most days
with the AF24, and on a strong rain if you use OSPF, the AF5X
On 05/13/2016 03:39 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Traditionally dedicated time-source hardware like rubidium-oscillator
GPSDOs is sold on accuracy, but for WAN time service their real draw
is long holdover time with lower frequency drift that you get from the
cheap, non-temperature-compensated
On 05/13/2016 04:38 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
But another key consideration beyond accuracy is the reliability of a server's
GPS constellation view. If you can lose GPS sync for an hour or more (not
uncommon in terrain-locked locations), the NTP time will go free-running and
could drift quite a
AF5X. The AF5 is not all that good (integrated small dishes for fdx, yuck).
The real Josh is still waiting on UbntChuck to do a ptmp sync product. At
least we're 2/3 of the way there :)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On May 14,
I didn't think the AF5 was much cheaper than an AF24 and I'd much rather be
up in the 24GHz band and out of any contention in 5GHz.
*Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net
*Arbor Networks*
+1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
www.arbornetworks.com
On Sat, May 14,
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH THE REAL JOSH LUTHMAN?!
On May 14, 2016 8:33 AM, "Josh Luthman" wrote:
> AF5X is hard to beat and cheaper...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On May 14, 2016 9:29
AF5X is hard to beat and cheaper...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On May 14, 2016 9:29 AM, "Jared Mauch" wrote:
> Ouch. Was also looking at b5 but $1400 for a pair is a bit steep if your
> effective range
Ouch. Was also looking at b5 but $1400 for a pair is a bit steep if your
effective range won't support a "short" 3-4km link.
Trying to bridge the gap, and UBNT has their pluses and minuses. Maybe AF5X
instead I guess.
Thanks!
Jared Mauch
> On May 14, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Hal Ponton
We've deployed 2 B5 links into production, the newer firmware seems to have
fixed the issues we saw in the links when we first tested them.
We have a very rural customer where two hops are needed around the site. We're
lucky in that we had two 80MHz channels free. We see around 350Mbps both
Jared - why not go to Ubiquiti AC gear if you need some more speed and
something more modern?
> On May 14, 2016, at 01:43, Eric C. Miller wrote:
>
> B5c is the only product that I've had much success with from Mimosa.
>
> The B5Lite is a cheap plastic shell and, and it
15 matches
Mail list logo